Measuring social accountability in health professional education: Development and international pilot testing of an evaluation framework.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Measuring social accountability in health professional education: Development and international pilot testing of an evaluation framework.
Authors: Larkins, Sarah L.1,2 (AUTHOR) sarah.larkins@jcu.edu.au, Preston, Robyn1,3 (AUTHOR), Matte, Marie C.4,5,6 (AUTHOR), Lindemann, Iris C.7,8 (AUTHOR), Samson, Rex9,10 (AUTHOR), Tandinco, Filedito D.11,12 (AUTHOR), Buso, David13,14 (AUTHOR), Ross, Simone J.1,15 (AUTHOR), Pálsdóttir, Björg16,17 (AUTHOR), Neusy, André-Jacques16,18 (AUTHOR), on behalf of the Training for Health Equity Network (THEnet)1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Medical Teacher. Jan2013, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p32-45. 14p.
Subject Terms: *Medical education, *Focus groups, *Medical schools, *Adult education workshops, *Human services programs, Conceptual structures, Interviewing, Pilot projects, Social responsibility, Judgment sampling, Evaluation of human services programs
Abstract: Background: Health professional schools are responsible for producing graduates with competencies and attitudes to address health inequities and respond to priority health needs. Health professional schools striving towards social accountability founded the Training for Health Equity Network (THEnet). Aim: This article describes the development of THEnet evaluation framework for socially accountable health professional education, presents the framework to be used as a tool by other schools and discusses the findings of pilot implementation at five schools. Methods: The framework was designed collaboratively and built on Boelen and Woollard's conceptualization, production and usability model. It includes key components, linked to aspirational statements, indicators and suggested measurement tools. Five schools completed pilot implementation, involving workshops, document/data review and focus group discussions with faculty, students and community members. Results: Three sections of the framework consider: How does our school work?; What do we do? and What difference do we make? Pilot testing proved that the evaluation framework was acceptable and feasible across contexts and produced findings useful at school level and to compare schools. The framework is designed as a formative exercise to help schools take a critical look at their performance and progress towards social accountability. Initiatives to implement the framework more widely are underway. The framework effectively aids in identifying strengths, weaknesses and gaps, with a view to schools striving for continuous self-improvement. Conclusion: THEnet evaluation framework is applicable and useful across contexts. It is possible and desirable to assess progress towards social accountability in health professional schools and this is an important step in producing health professionals with knowledge, attitudes, and skills to meet the challenges of priority health needs of underserved populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 84551016
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Measuring social accountability in health professional education: Development and international pilot testing of an evaluation framework.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Larkins%2C+Sarah+L%2E%22">Larkins, Sarah L.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> sarah.larkins@jcu.edu.au</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Preston%2C+Robyn%22">Preston, Robyn</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Matte%2C+Marie+C%2E%22">Matte, Marie C.</searchLink><relatesTo>4,5,6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lindemann%2C+Iris+C%2E%22">Lindemann, Iris C.</searchLink><relatesTo>7,8</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Samson%2C+Rex%22">Samson, Rex</searchLink><relatesTo>9,10</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tandinco%2C+Filedito+D%2E%22">Tandinco, Filedito D.</searchLink><relatesTo>11,12</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Buso%2C+David%22">Buso, David</searchLink><relatesTo>13,14</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ross%2C+Simone+J%2E%22">Ross, Simone J.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,15</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pálsdóttir%2C+Björg%22">Pálsdóttir, Björg</searchLink><relatesTo>16,17</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Neusy%2C+André-Jacques%22">Neusy, André-Jacques</searchLink><relatesTo>16,18</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22on+behalf+of+the+Training+for+Health+Equity+Network+%28THEnet%29%22">on behalf of the Training for Health Equity Network (THEnet)</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Teacher%22">Medical Teacher</searchLink>. Jan2013, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p32-45. 14p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+education%22">Medical education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Focus+groups%22">Focus groups</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+schools%22">Medical schools</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adult+education+workshops%22">Adult education workshops</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+services+programs%22">Human services programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conceptual+structures%22">Conceptual structures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pilot+projects%22">Pilot projects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+responsibility%22">Social responsibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Judgment+sampling%22">Judgment sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+of+human+services+programs%22">Evaluation of human services programs</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Health professional schools are responsible for producing graduates with competencies and attitudes to address health inequities and respond to priority health needs. Health professional schools striving towards social accountability founded the Training for Health Equity Network (THEnet). Aim: This article describes the development of THEnet evaluation framework for socially accountable health professional education, presents the framework to be used as a tool by other schools and discusses the findings of pilot implementation at five schools. Methods: The framework was designed collaboratively and built on Boelen and Woollard's conceptualization, production and usability model. It includes key components, linked to aspirational statements, indicators and suggested measurement tools. Five schools completed pilot implementation, involving workshops, document/data review and focus group discussions with faculty, students and community members. Results: Three sections of the framework consider: How does our school work?; What do we do? and What difference do we make? Pilot testing proved that the evaluation framework was acceptable and feasible across contexts and produced findings useful at school level and to compare schools. The framework is designed as a formative exercise to help schools take a critical look at their performance and progress towards social accountability. Initiatives to implement the framework more widely are underway. The framework effectively aids in identifying strengths, weaknesses and gaps, with a view to schools striving for continuous self-improvement. Conclusion: THEnet evaluation framework is applicable and useful across contexts. It is possible and desirable to assess progress towards social accountability in health professional schools and this is an important step in producing health professionals with knowledge, attitudes, and skills to meet the challenges of priority health needs of underserved populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=84551016
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.731106
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 32
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Medical education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Focus groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Adult education workshops
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Human services programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Conceptual structures
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pilot projects
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social responsibility
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Judgment sampling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation of human services programs
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Measuring social accountability in health professional education: Development and international pilot testing of an evaluation framework.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Larkins, Sarah L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Preston, Robyn
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Matte, Marie C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lindemann, Iris C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Samson, Rex
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tandinco, Filedito D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Buso, David
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ross, Simone J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pálsdóttir, Björg
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Neusy, André-Jacques
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: on behalf of the Training for Health Equity Network (THEnet)
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan2013
              Type: published
              Y: 2013
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0142159X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 35
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Medical Teacher
              Type: main
ResultId 1