Identifying Kinds of Reasoning in Collective Argumentation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Identifying Kinds of Reasoning in Collective Argumentation.
Authors: Conner, AnnaMarie1, Singletary, Laura M.2, Smith, Ryan C.1, Wagner, Patty Anne1, Francisco, Richard T.1
Source: Mathematical Thinking & Learning. 2014, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p181-200. 20p.
Subject Terms: *Deductive teaching, *Mathematics education, *Reasoning, Debate, Hypothesis
Abstract: We combine Peirce’s rule, case, and result with Toulmin’s data, claim, and warrant to differentiate between deductive, inductive, abductive, and analogical reasoning within collective argumentation. In this theoretical article, we illustrate these kinds of reasoning in episodes of collective argumentation using examples from one teacher’s practice. Examining different kinds of reasoning in collective argumentation can inform how students engage in generating and examining hypotheses using inductive and abductive reasoning and move toward the deductive reasoning required for proof. Mathematics educators can build on their understanding of these kinds of reasoning to support students in reasoning in productive ways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Mathematical Thinking & Learning is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 96861751
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Identifying Kinds of Reasoning in Collective Argumentation.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Conner%2C+AnnaMarie%22">Conner, AnnaMarie</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Singletary%2C+Laura+M%2E%22">Singletary, Laura M.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Smith%2C+Ryan+C%2E%22">Smith, Ryan C.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wagner%2C+Patty+Anne%22">Wagner, Patty Anne</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Francisco%2C+Richard+T%2E%22">Francisco, Richard T.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Mathematical+Thinking+%26+Learning%22">Mathematical Thinking & Learning</searchLink>. 2014, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p181-200. 20p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Deductive+teaching%22">Deductive teaching</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+education%22">Mathematics education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reasoning%22">Reasoning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Debate%22">Debate</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hypothesis%22">Hypothesis</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: We combine Peirce’s rule, case, and result with Toulmin’s data, claim, and warrant to differentiate between deductive, inductive, abductive, and analogical reasoning within collective argumentation. In this theoretical article, we illustrate these kinds of reasoning in episodes of collective argumentation using examples from one teacher’s practice. Examining different kinds of reasoning in collective argumentation can inform how students engage in generating and examining hypotheses using inductive and abductive reasoning and move toward the deductive reasoning required for proof. Mathematics educators can build on their understanding of these kinds of reasoning to support students in reasoning in productive ways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Mathematical Thinking & Learning is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=96861751
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/10986065.2014.921131
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
        StartPage: 181
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Deductive teaching
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematics education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reasoning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Debate
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hypothesis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Identifying Kinds of Reasoning in Collective Argumentation.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Conner, AnnaMarie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Singletary, Laura M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Smith, Ryan C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wagner, Patty Anne
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Francisco, Richard T.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: 2014
              Type: published
              Y: 2014
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10986065
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 16
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Mathematical Thinking & Learning
              Type: main
ResultId 1