View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Rational and Compassionate Information Processing: A Conceptual Framework for Authentic Dialogue.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Rational and Compassionate Information Processing: A Conceptual Framework for Authentic Dialogue.
Authors: Choi, Taehyon1 taehyon@snu.ac.kr
Source: Public Administration Review. Nov2014, Vol. 74 Issue 6, p726-735. 10p. 1 Diagram.
Subject Terms: *Decision making, *Conversation, Public meetings, Public administration, Democracy, Political science
Abstract: Authentic dialogue is a key component of deliberative democracy. Public administration scholars and practitioners have focused on institutional settings for authentic dialogue, but they have paid less attention to behavioral aspects, especially the emotional component, of authentic dialogue. The author proposes a conceptual framework for authentic dialogue that highlights the three dimensions of its social-behavioral foundation: epistemic, social, and compassionate information processing motivation. The article reviews the discourse on authentic dialogue in public administration and provides a conceptual framework for authentic dialogue, with a discussion of the three behavioral dimensions, their relationships, and their effects. This framework may be used in empirical analysis of authentic dialogue and the design of institutions for deliberative democracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Public Administration Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 99219243
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Rational and Compassionate Information Processing: A Conceptual Framework for Authentic Dialogue.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Choi%2C+Taehyon%22">Choi, Taehyon</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> taehyon@snu.ac.kr</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Public+Administration+Review%22">Public Administration Review</searchLink>. Nov2014, Vol. 74 Issue 6, p726-735. 10p. 1 Diagram.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conversation%22">Conversation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+meetings%22">Public meetings</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+administration%22">Public administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Democracy%22">Democracy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Political+science%22">Political science</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Authentic dialogue is a key component of deliberative democracy. Public administration scholars and practitioners have focused on institutional settings for authentic dialogue, but they have paid less attention to behavioral aspects, especially the emotional component, of authentic dialogue. The author proposes a conceptual framework for authentic dialogue that highlights the three dimensions of its social-behavioral foundation: epistemic, social, and compassionate information processing motivation. The article reviews the discourse on authentic dialogue in public administration and provides a conceptual framework for authentic dialogue, with a discussion of the three behavioral dimensions, their relationships, and their effects. This framework may be used in empirical analysis of authentic dialogue and the design of institutions for deliberative democracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Public Administration Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=99219243
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/puar.12277
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 726
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Decision making
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Conversation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public meetings
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public administration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Democracy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Political science
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Rational and Compassionate Information Processing: A Conceptual Framework for Authentic Dialogue.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Choi, Taehyon
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2014
              Type: published
              Y: 2014
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00333352
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 74
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Public Administration Review
              Type: main
ResultId 1