APA (7th ed.) Citation

Santin, M., Morandeira-Rego, F., Alcaide, F., Rabuñal, R., Anibarro, L., Agüero-Balbín, R., . . . Jové, N. (2016). Detection of interleukin-2 is not useful for distinguishing between latent and active tuberculosis in clinical practice: A prospective cohort study. Clinical Microbiology & Infection, 22(12), 1007.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.09.004

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Santin, M., et al. "Detection of Interleukin-2 Is Not Useful for Distinguishing Between Latent and Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice: A Prospective Cohort Study." Clinical Microbiology & Infection 22, no. 12 (2016): 1007.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.09.004.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Santin, M., et al. "Detection of Interleukin-2 Is Not Useful for Distinguishing Between Latent and Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice: A Prospective Cohort Study." Clinical Microbiology & Infection, vol. 22, no. 12, 2016, p. 1007.e1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.09.004.