Critical minerals versus major minerals: a comparative study of exploration budgets.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Critical minerals versus major minerals: a comparative study of exploration budgets.
Authors: Castillo, Emilio1 (AUTHOR) ecastillo@uchile.cl, del Real, Irene2 (AUTHOR), Roa, Cintia3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Mineral Economics: Raw Materials Report. Sep2024, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p433-444. 12p.
Subject Terms: *Multivariate analysis, *Prices, *Prospecting, *Budget, *Supply chain disruptions
Abstract: Disruptions in the minerals supply chain play a central role in defining the future stock of minerals; therefore, an in-depth analysis of the outcomes and variables affecting exploration is required. In comparative terms, the exploration of critical minerals and major minerals presents geological and technical differences; thus, exploration budgets for critical minerals should be expected to depart from those observed in other minerals. In this context, the main goal of this paper is to contrast how exploration budgets differ between critical and major minerals when considering a set of key variables. We take a multivariate statistical analysis approach based on firm-level budget exploration data to show four key findings: exploration budgets allocated for critical minerals remain consistently lower than major minerals even when controlling for other factors. Moreover, they present a higher sensitivity to fluctuations in commodity prices. Besides, the investment made by larger companies in critical minerals significantly lags behind those made by junior companies. Additionally, the focus of exploration activity for critical minerals predominantly lies in the earlier stages of the exploration process. We expect these initial results to be used as a step forward to facilitate the discussion about exploration policies and, consequently, the reliability of the supply chain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Energy & Power Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: enr
DbLabel: Energy & Power Source
An: 180004344
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Critical minerals versus major minerals: a comparative study of exploration budgets.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Castillo%2C+Emilio%22">Castillo, Emilio</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> ecastillo@uchile.cl</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22del+Real%2C+Irene%22">del Real, Irene</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Roa%2C+Cintia%22">Roa, Cintia</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Mineral+Economics%3A+Raw+Materials+Report%22">Mineral Economics: Raw Materials Report</searchLink>. Sep2024, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p433-444. 12p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multivariate+analysis%22">Multivariate analysis</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prices%22">Prices</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prospecting%22">Prospecting</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Budget%22">Budget</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Supply+chain+disruptions%22">Supply chain disruptions</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Disruptions in the minerals supply chain play a central role in defining the future stock of minerals; therefore, an in-depth analysis of the outcomes and variables affecting exploration is required. In comparative terms, the exploration of critical minerals and major minerals presents geological and technical differences; thus, exploration budgets for critical minerals should be expected to depart from those observed in other minerals. In this context, the main goal of this paper is to contrast how exploration budgets differ between critical and major minerals when considering a set of key variables. We take a multivariate statistical analysis approach based on firm-level budget exploration data to show four key findings: exploration budgets allocated for critical minerals remain consistently lower than major minerals even when controlling for other factors. Moreover, they present a higher sensitivity to fluctuations in commodity prices. Besides, the investment made by larger companies in critical minerals significantly lags behind those made by junior companies. Additionally, the focus of exploration activity for critical minerals predominantly lies in the earlier stages of the exploration process. We expect these initial results to be used as a step forward to facilitate the discussion about exploration policies and, consequently, the reliability of the supply chain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=enr&AN=180004344
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s13563-023-00388-w
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 433
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Multivariate analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prices
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prospecting
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Budget
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Supply chain disruptions
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Critical minerals versus major minerals: a comparative study of exploration budgets.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Castillo, Emilio
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: del Real, Irene
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Roa, Cintia
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 21912203
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 37
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Mineral Economics: Raw Materials Report
              Type: main
ResultId 1