View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: insights from two case studies in India.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: insights from two case studies in India.
Authors: ElDidi, Hagar1 (AUTHOR) h.eldidi@cgiar.org, Rawat, Shivanyaa2 (AUTHOR) shivanyaa.rawat10@gmail.com, Meinzen-Dick, Ruth1 (AUTHOR) r.meinzen-dick@cgiar.org, Chaturvedi, Rahul2 (AUTHOR) rahul.chaturvedi@fes.org.in, Sanil, Richu2 (AUTHOR) richu@fes.org.in
Source: Environment, Development & Sustainability. Dec2025, Vol. 27 Issue 12, p29797-29823. 27p.
Subject Terms: *Commons, *Nongovernmental organizations, *Stakeholder analysis, *Multi-level governance (Theory), *Collective action, *Community involvement
Geographic Terms: India, Gujarat (India), Odisha (India)
Abstract: Commons governance is complex and polycentric, involving a range of actors, working at different scales with different concepts of development, and different types of power. Multistakeholder platforms (MSPs) have generated considerable attention as a way to address these tensions among multiple and overlapping decision-making centers operating on different administrative levels. Yet establishing MSPs that effectively involve community, various government actors, and private sector actors is far from straightforward. This paper analyzes the Indian NGO Foundation for Ecological Security's (FES) experience of strengthening polycentric governance through case studies of two MSPs in Gujarat and Odisha working at the block (sub-district) level—encompassing multiple communities situated around a commons landscape. We gather information from a variety of sources including a survey of MSP participants, focus groups and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders, media articles, as well as institutional knowledge such as FES project reports. By analyzing local environments, institutional arrangements, stakeholder interactions, governance processes and the evolution of MSPs in the two cases, it distills lessons on the tangible and intangible benefits of multi-stakeholder engagement, scale, and enabling conditions useful for scaling up MSPs. We argue that the groundwork carried out to build community-level collective action supports effective polycentric governance of resources on the landscape-level, especially through block-level MSPs that facilitate inter-community collaboration and learning, strengthening local voices and building trust between stakeholders over time. The cases also highlight that MSPs can evolve in different ways as the various actors interact and exercise influence. External actors like NGOs thus play an important role as facilitators and through mobilizing communities to help them claim their agency. We find that nesting village-level institutions in federations and federations in larger MSPs is important for robust and sustainable collective action and bridging sectoral and institutional boundaries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Energy & Power Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: enr
DbLabel: Energy & Power Source
An: 189634425
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: insights from two case studies in India.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22ElDidi%2C+Hagar%22">ElDidi, Hagar</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> h.eldidi@cgiar.org</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rawat%2C+Shivanyaa%22">Rawat, Shivanyaa</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> shivanyaa.rawat10@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meinzen-Dick%2C+Ruth%22">Meinzen-Dick, Ruth</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> r.meinzen-dick@cgiar.org</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chaturvedi%2C+Rahul%22">Chaturvedi, Rahul</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> rahul.chaturvedi@fes.org.in</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sanil%2C+Richu%22">Sanil, Richu</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> richu@fes.org.in</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Environment%2C+Development+%26+Sustainability%22">Environment, Development & Sustainability</searchLink>. Dec2025, Vol. 27 Issue 12, p29797-29823. 27p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Commons%22">Commons</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nongovernmental+organizations%22">Nongovernmental organizations</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stakeholder+analysis%22">Stakeholder analysis</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multi-level+governance+%28Theory%29%22">Multi-level governance (Theory)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Collective+action%22">Collective action</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Community+involvement%22">Community involvement</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22India%22">India</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gujarat+%28India%29%22">Gujarat (India)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Odisha+%28India%29%22">Odisha (India)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Commons governance is complex and polycentric, involving a range of actors, working at different scales with different concepts of development, and different types of power. Multistakeholder platforms (MSPs) have generated considerable attention as a way to address these tensions among multiple and overlapping decision-making centers operating on different administrative levels. Yet establishing MSPs that effectively involve community, various government actors, and private sector actors is far from straightforward. This paper analyzes the Indian NGO Foundation for Ecological Security's (FES) experience of strengthening polycentric governance through case studies of two MSPs in Gujarat and Odisha working at the block (sub-district) level—encompassing multiple communities situated around a commons landscape. We gather information from a variety of sources including a survey of MSP participants, focus groups and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders, media articles, as well as institutional knowledge such as FES project reports. By analyzing local environments, institutional arrangements, stakeholder interactions, governance processes and the evolution of MSPs in the two cases, it distills lessons on the tangible and intangible benefits of multi-stakeholder engagement, scale, and enabling conditions useful for scaling up MSPs. We argue that the groundwork carried out to build community-level collective action supports effective polycentric governance of resources on the landscape-level, especially through block-level MSPs that facilitate inter-community collaboration and learning, strengthening local voices and building trust between stakeholders over time. The cases also highlight that MSPs can evolve in different ways as the various actors interact and exercise influence. External actors like NGOs thus play an important role as facilitators and through mobilizing communities to help them claim their agency. We find that nesting village-level institutions in federations and federations in larger MSPs is important for robust and sustainable collective action and bridging sectoral and institutional boundaries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=enr&AN=189634425
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10668-024-04896-9
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 27
        StartPage: 29797
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Commons
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nongovernmental organizations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stakeholder analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Multi-level governance (Theory)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Collective action
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Community involvement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: India
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Gujarat (India)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Odisha (India)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: insights from two case studies in India.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: ElDidi, Hagar
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rawat, Shivanyaa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Meinzen-Dick, Ruth
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chaturvedi, Rahul
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sanil, Richu
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1387585X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 27
            – Type: issue
              Value: 12
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Environment, Development & Sustainability
              Type: main
ResultId 1