View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

The social impacts of circular economy: disclosing epistemological stances and methodological practices.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The social impacts of circular economy: disclosing epistemological stances and methodological practices.
Authors: Iofrida, Nathalie1 (AUTHOR) nathalie.iofrida@unirc.it, Spada, Emanuele1 (AUTHOR), Gulisano, Giovanni1 (AUTHOR), De Luca, Anna Irene1 (AUTHOR), Falcone, Giacomo1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Environment, Development & Sustainability. May2026, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p12735-12768. 34p.
Subject Terms: *Circular economy, *Social impact, *Research methodology, *Sustainability, *Qualitative research, *Phenomenology, *Theory of knowledge
Abstract: The essence of circular economy is about closing the loop of material flows by reducing, reusing, recovering and recycling, ensuring the economic prosperity without any detriment for the environment. However, few information is available about the contribution of circular systems to the social dimension of sustainability (such as well-being, quality of life), how these aspects are evaluated and why they are deemed as important. The purpose of this study is to review those scientific studies that dealt with the social sustainability evaluations of circular systems to highlight new aspects: not only which are the most applied methodologies, which impact categories and indicators are mostly taken into account, but, above all, which is the most diffused epistemological position underlying the evaluation of social aspects of circularity. This last aspect is often disregarded but of utmost importance because it shapes the approaches and procedures choice, and legitimate and justify the insights provided: indeed, they can be the most diverse when dealing with social sciences, which are multiparadigmatic sciences. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have so far emerged that directly investigate the epistemological basis of social impacts within the circular economy. A systematic and hermeneutic review of the scientific literature has been led through a two steps method. The first step, dedicated to search and acquisition, consisted in a standardized replicable process called Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). In a second phase, a hermeneutic review has been conducted on the selected publications. Among the 42 studies reviewed, 7 papers were framed within the post-positivism paradigms, while 83,3% were based on interpretivist paradigms, showing how it is difficult to find consensus on standardized quantification methods for social impacts in circular economy studies. The most recurring qualitative methods relied on personal interpretations, perceptions or observations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Energy & Power Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: enr
DbLabel: Energy & Power Source
An: 193284025
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The social impacts of circular economy: disclosing epistemological stances and methodological practices.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Iofrida%2C+Nathalie%22">Iofrida, Nathalie</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> nathalie.iofrida@unirc.it</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Spada%2C+Emanuele%22">Spada, Emanuele</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gulisano%2C+Giovanni%22">Gulisano, Giovanni</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22De+Luca%2C+Anna+Irene%22">De Luca, Anna Irene</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Falcone%2C+Giacomo%22">Falcone, Giacomo</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Environment%2C+Development+%26+Sustainability%22">Environment, Development & Sustainability</searchLink>. May2026, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p12735-12768. 34p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Circular+economy%22">Circular economy</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+impact%22">Social impact</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sustainability%22">Sustainability</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Phenomenology%22">Phenomenology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theory+of+knowledge%22">Theory of knowledge</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The essence of circular economy is about closing the loop of material flows by reducing, reusing, recovering and recycling, ensuring the economic prosperity without any detriment for the environment. However, few information is available about the contribution of circular systems to the social dimension of sustainability (such as well-being, quality of life), how these aspects are evaluated and why they are deemed as important. The purpose of this study is to review those scientific studies that dealt with the social sustainability evaluations of circular systems to highlight new aspects: not only which are the most applied methodologies, which impact categories and indicators are mostly taken into account, but, above all, which is the most diffused epistemological position underlying the evaluation of social aspects of circularity. This last aspect is often disregarded but of utmost importance because it shapes the approaches and procedures choice, and legitimate and justify the insights provided: indeed, they can be the most diverse when dealing with social sciences, which are multiparadigmatic sciences. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have so far emerged that directly investigate the epistemological basis of social impacts within the circular economy. A systematic and hermeneutic review of the scientific literature has been led through a two steps method. The first step, dedicated to search and acquisition, consisted in a standardized replicable process called Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). In a second phase, a hermeneutic review has been conducted on the selected publications. Among the 42 studies reviewed, 7 papers were framed within the post-positivism paradigms, while 83,3% were based on interpretivist paradigms, showing how it is difficult to find consensus on standardized quantification methods for social impacts in circular economy studies. The most recurring qualitative methods relied on personal interpretations, perceptions or observations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=enr&AN=193284025
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10668-024-05438-z
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 34
        StartPage: 12735
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Circular economy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social impact
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sustainability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Phenomenology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Theory of knowledge
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The social impacts of circular economy: disclosing epistemological stances and methodological practices.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Iofrida, Nathalie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Spada, Emanuele
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gulisano, Giovanni
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: De Luca, Anna Irene
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Falcone, Giacomo
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1387585X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 28
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Environment, Development & Sustainability
              Type: main
ResultId 1