Are Apologies Always the Best Policy? Apologies for Service Failures Backfire When Consumers Are Not Aware of the Failure.
Saved in:
| Title: | Are Apologies Always the Best Policy? Apologies for Service Failures Backfire When Consumers Are Not Aware of the Failure. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Jenkins, Mason R (AUTHOR), Fombelle, Paul W (AUTHOR), Steffel, Mary (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Consumer Research. Jun2026, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p1-21. 21p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Apologizing, *Failure (Psychology), *Customer services, *Trust, *Customer satisfaction, *Word of mouth advertising, *Patronage |
| Abstract: | Technological advancements enable firms to anticipate service failures and apologize to consumers more effectively than ever. However, are apologies always the best policy? Five experiments, including a large-scale field experiment, demonstrate that apologies backfire when consumers are not aware of the failure. Apologies decrease consumer satisfaction, trust, recommendation intentions, and repatronage behavior. This is because apologies increase awareness that a failure occurred. Accordingly, apologies backfire for both mild and severe failures so long as there is room to increase awareness of the failure. Moreover, apologies backfire more than notifications about a service failure because although both increase awareness of the aspect of the service experience that was a failure, apologies uniquely increase awareness that this constituted a failure. Beyond increasing awareness, apologies backfire by decreasing perceived service quality and competence. However, apologies also increase perceived warmth and honesty. Consequently, apologizing can be beneficial when consumers are already aware of a failure because apologies are less likely to backfire and more likely to enhance positive perceptions of the firm. These findings challenge the conventional wisdom that apologies are always the best policy when something goes wrong and provide insight into when and when not to apologize. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Database: | Energy & Power Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: enr DbLabel: Energy & Power Source An: 193756924 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Are Apologies Always the Best Policy? Apologies for Service Failures Backfire When Consumers Are Not Aware of the Failure. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jenkins%2C+Mason+R%22">Jenkins, Mason R</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fombelle%2C+Paul+W%22">Fombelle, Paul W</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Steffel%2C+Mary%22">Steffel, Mary</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Consumer+Research%22">Journal of Consumer Research</searchLink>. Jun2026, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p1-21. 21p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Apologizing%22">Apologizing</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Failure+%28Psychology%29%22">Failure (Psychology)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Customer+services%22">Customer services</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Trust%22">Trust</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Customer+satisfaction%22">Customer satisfaction</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Word+of+mouth+advertising%22">Word of mouth advertising</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patronage%22">Patronage</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Technological advancements enable firms to anticipate service failures and apologize to consumers more effectively than ever. However, are apologies always the best policy? Five experiments, including a large-scale field experiment, demonstrate that apologies backfire when consumers are not aware of the failure. Apologies decrease consumer satisfaction, trust, recommendation intentions, and repatronage behavior. This is because apologies increase awareness that a failure occurred. Accordingly, apologies backfire for both mild and severe failures so long as there is room to increase awareness of the failure. Moreover, apologies backfire more than notifications about a service failure because although both increase awareness of the aspect of the service experience that was a failure, apologies uniquely increase awareness that this constituted a failure. Beyond increasing awareness, apologies backfire by decreasing perceived service quality and competence. However, apologies also increase perceived warmth and honesty. Consequently, apologizing can be beneficial when consumers are already aware of a failure because apologies are less likely to backfire and more likely to enhance positive perceptions of the firm. These findings challenge the conventional wisdom that apologies are always the best policy when something goes wrong and provide insight into when and when not to apologize. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=enr&AN=193756924 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1093/jcr/ucaf064 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Apologizing Type: general – SubjectFull: Failure (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Customer services Type: general – SubjectFull: Trust Type: general – SubjectFull: Customer satisfaction Type: general – SubjectFull: Word of mouth advertising Type: general – SubjectFull: Patronage Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Are Apologies Always the Best Policy? Apologies for Service Failures Backfire When Consumers Are Not Aware of the Failure. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jenkins, Mason R – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fombelle, Paul W – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Steffel, Mary IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00935301 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 53 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Consumer Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |