Are Apologies Always the Best Policy? Apologies for Service Failures Backfire When Consumers Are Not Aware of the Failure.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Are Apologies Always the Best Policy? Apologies for Service Failures Backfire When Consumers Are Not Aware of the Failure.
Authors: Jenkins, Mason R (AUTHOR), Fombelle, Paul W (AUTHOR), Steffel, Mary (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Consumer Research. Jun2026, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p1-21. 21p.
Subject Terms: *Apologizing, *Failure (Psychology), *Customer services, *Trust, *Customer satisfaction, *Word of mouth advertising, *Patronage
Abstract: Technological advancements enable firms to anticipate service failures and apologize to consumers more effectively than ever. However, are apologies always the best policy? Five experiments, including a large-scale field experiment, demonstrate that apologies backfire when consumers are not aware of the failure. Apologies decrease consumer satisfaction, trust, recommendation intentions, and repatronage behavior. This is because apologies increase awareness that a failure occurred. Accordingly, apologies backfire for both mild and severe failures so long as there is room to increase awareness of the failure. Moreover, apologies backfire more than notifications about a service failure because although both increase awareness of the aspect of the service experience that was a failure, apologies uniquely increase awareness that this constituted a failure. Beyond increasing awareness, apologies backfire by decreasing perceived service quality and competence. However, apologies also increase perceived warmth and honesty. Consequently, apologizing can be beneficial when consumers are already aware of a failure because apologies are less likely to backfire and more likely to enhance positive perceptions of the firm. These findings challenge the conventional wisdom that apologies are always the best policy when something goes wrong and provide insight into when and when not to apologize. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Energy & Power Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: enr
DbLabel: Energy & Power Source
An: 193756924
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Are Apologies Always the Best Policy? Apologies for Service Failures Backfire When Consumers Are Not Aware of the Failure.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jenkins%2C+Mason+R%22">Jenkins, Mason R</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fombelle%2C+Paul+W%22">Fombelle, Paul W</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Steffel%2C+Mary%22">Steffel, Mary</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Consumer+Research%22">Journal of Consumer Research</searchLink>. Jun2026, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p1-21. 21p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Apologizing%22">Apologizing</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Failure+%28Psychology%29%22">Failure (Psychology)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Customer+services%22">Customer services</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Trust%22">Trust</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Customer+satisfaction%22">Customer satisfaction</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Word+of+mouth+advertising%22">Word of mouth advertising</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patronage%22">Patronage</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Technological advancements enable firms to anticipate service failures and apologize to consumers more effectively than ever. However, are apologies always the best policy? Five experiments, including a large-scale field experiment, demonstrate that apologies backfire when consumers are not aware of the failure. Apologies decrease consumer satisfaction, trust, recommendation intentions, and repatronage behavior. This is because apologies increase awareness that a failure occurred. Accordingly, apologies backfire for both mild and severe failures so long as there is room to increase awareness of the failure. Moreover, apologies backfire more than notifications about a service failure because although both increase awareness of the aspect of the service experience that was a failure, apologies uniquely increase awareness that this constituted a failure. Beyond increasing awareness, apologies backfire by decreasing perceived service quality and competence. However, apologies also increase perceived warmth and honesty. Consequently, apologizing can be beneficial when consumers are already aware of a failure because apologies are less likely to backfire and more likely to enhance positive perceptions of the firm. These findings challenge the conventional wisdom that apologies are always the best policy when something goes wrong and provide insight into when and when not to apologize. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=enr&AN=193756924
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1093/jcr/ucaf064
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 21
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Apologizing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Failure (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Customer services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Trust
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Customer satisfaction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Word of mouth advertising
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Patronage
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Are Apologies Always the Best Policy? Apologies for Service Failures Backfire When Consumers Are Not Aware of the Failure.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jenkins, Mason R
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fombelle, Paul W
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Steffel, Mary
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00935301
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 53
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Consumer Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1