Scenario-Based Multi-Objective Optimisation for Rural Electrification Under Carbon, Economic, and Equity Constraints.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Scenario-Based Multi-Objective Optimisation for Rural Electrification Under Carbon, Economic, and Equity Constraints.
Authors: Ighravwe, Desmond Eseoghene1,2,3 (AUTHOR) deighravwe@bellsuniversity.edu.ng, Babatunde, Olubayo1,2 (AUTHOR), Olanrewaju, Oludolapo Akanni2,3 (AUTHOR), Adetiba, Emmanuel1,2 (AUTHOR)
Source: Energies (19961073). Jun2026, Vol. 19 Issue 12, p2922. 27p.
Subject Terms: *Rural electrification, *Multi-objective optimization, *Sub-Saharan Africans, *Renewable energy sources, *Carbon emissions, *Policy sciences, *Sustainable development
Geographic Terms: Nigeria, Sub-Saharan Africa
Abstract: Rural electrification in Sub-Saharan Africa faces a trilemma: cutting carbon emissions, making it economically viable, and achieving fair access to energy for all. This paper develops a multi-objective framework that optimises carbon revenue, net present value (NPV), total energy supply, cooking fuel (firewood and LPG), health costs, and benefit to society. The model uses continuous decision variables: daily energy allocation among four sources (solar, generator, firewood, LPG) to three population groups (men, women, children). The case study is a rural community of 7000 people in Nigeria (Tier 1 energy consumers). Six policy scenarios are considered: baseline, high carbon price, low carbon price, microfinance, government subsidy and community cooperative. This study compared algorithms and identified a hybrid Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimisation II as the most suitable algorithm for solving the formulated optimisation problem. It was found that NPV and unit cost of energy would increase to $175,500 and 26.4 ¢/kWh, respectively, by increasing the price of carbon from $8/ton to $12/ton. Firewood generates health savings and carbon revenue in the range of $4100–$12,270/year. Prices below $8/ton do not induce optimal reconfigurations in the system. The best energy supply (2825 kWh/day) and the lowest unsatisfied demand occur in the government subsidy scenario with the greatest disparity index, displaying an equity-efficiency trade-off. The framework shows that sustainable access to energy can be unlocked using strategic integration of carbon finance, valuation of health benefits and equity constraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Energy & Power Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: enr
DbLabel: Energy & Power Source
An: 194909371
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Scenario-Based Multi-Objective Optimisation for Rural Electrification Under Carbon, Economic, and Equity Constraints.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ighravwe%2C+Desmond+Eseoghene%22">Ighravwe, Desmond Eseoghene</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> deighravwe@bellsuniversity.edu.ng</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Babatunde%2C+Olubayo%22">Babatunde, Olubayo</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Olanrewaju%2C+Oludolapo+Akanni%22">Olanrewaju, Oludolapo Akanni</searchLink><relatesTo>2,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Adetiba%2C+Emmanuel%22">Adetiba, Emmanuel</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Energies+%2819961073%29%22">Energies (19961073)</searchLink>. Jun2026, Vol. 19 Issue 12, p2922. 27p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rural+electrification%22">Rural electrification</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multi-objective+optimization%22">Multi-objective optimization</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sub-Saharan+Africans%22">Sub-Saharan Africans</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Renewable+energy+sources%22">Renewable energy sources</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Carbon+emissions%22">Carbon emissions</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+sciences%22">Policy sciences</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sustainable+development%22">Sustainable development</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nigeria%22">Nigeria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sub-Saharan+Africa%22">Sub-Saharan Africa</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Rural electrification in Sub-Saharan Africa faces a trilemma: cutting carbon emissions, making it economically viable, and achieving fair access to energy for all. This paper develops a multi-objective framework that optimises carbon revenue, net present value (NPV), total energy supply, cooking fuel (firewood and LPG), health costs, and benefit to society. The model uses continuous decision variables: daily energy allocation among four sources (solar, generator, firewood, LPG) to three population groups (men, women, children). The case study is a rural community of 7000 people in Nigeria (Tier 1 energy consumers). Six policy scenarios are considered: baseline, high carbon price, low carbon price, microfinance, government subsidy and community cooperative. This study compared algorithms and identified a hybrid Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimisation II as the most suitable algorithm for solving the formulated optimisation problem. It was found that NPV and unit cost of energy would increase to $175,500 and 26.4 ¢/kWh, respectively, by increasing the price of carbon from $8/ton to $12/ton. Firewood generates health savings and carbon revenue in the range of $4100–$12,270/year. Prices below $8/ton do not induce optimal reconfigurations in the system. The best energy supply (2825 kWh/day) and the lowest unsatisfied demand occur in the government subsidy scenario with the greatest disparity index, displaying an equity-efficiency trade-off. The framework shows that sustainable access to energy can be unlocked using strategic integration of carbon finance, valuation of health benefits and equity constraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=enr&AN=194909371
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.3390/en19122922
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 27
        StartPage: 2922
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Rural electrification
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Multi-objective optimization
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sub-Saharan Africans
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Renewable energy sources
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Carbon emissions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Policy sciences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sustainable development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nigeria
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sub-Saharan Africa
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Scenario-Based Multi-Objective Optimisation for Rural Electrification Under Carbon, Economic, and Equity Constraints.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ighravwe, Desmond Eseoghene
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Babatunde, Olubayo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Olanrewaju, Oludolapo Akanni
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Adetiba, Emmanuel
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 15
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 19961073
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 19
            – Type: issue
              Value: 12
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Energies (19961073)
              Type: main
ResultId 1