The "Confidence" Trap: When the Likelihood Is Low, Forecasters Look Less Competent When They Refer to Their Confidence in an Outcome Rather Than Its Probability.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The "Confidence" Trap: When the Likelihood Is Low, Forecasters Look Less Competent When They Refer to Their Confidence in an Outcome Rather Than Its Probability.
Authors: Palmeira, Mauricio (AUTHOR), Chen, Haipeng (Allan) (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Consumer Research. Aug2026, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p390-408. 19p.
Subject Terms: *Marketing forecasting, *Consumer behavior, *Decision making, *Shopping, *Probability theory, *Confidence
Abstract: Marketers make various forecasts, including those about new products, financial instruments, sporting events, and medical procedures, to influence consumer decisions. In communicating the likelihood that a forecaster assigns to an outcome, the forecaster can refer to their confidence in the outcome (e.g. "I'm 30% confident") or the probability of the outcome (e.g. "There is a 30% probability"). The authors propose that the choice of language (e.g. probability vs. confidence) affects the perceptions of forecasters, yielding predictable consequences on consumer decisions. Specifically, some languages (e.g. confident/sure/certain) encourage internal attributions (e.g. to a forecaster), whereas other languages (e.g. probability/likelihood/chance) encourage external attributions (e.g. to an outcome). As a result, expressions of a forecaster's confidence (vs. outcome probability) make the forecaster look less competent, especially when the likelihood of the outcome is low. A series of studies shows the effect in various consumption scenarios. The effect is mediated by internal (vs. external) attributions, influences real betting decisions, and is mitigated when the likelihood is high and among consumers with a weaker tendency to make internal attributions (i.e. a weaker correspondence bias). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Energy & Power Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: enr
DbLabel: Energy & Power Source
An: 195476960
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The "Confidence" Trap: When the Likelihood Is Low, Forecasters Look Less Competent When They Refer to Their Confidence in an Outcome Rather Than Its Probability.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Palmeira%2C+Mauricio%22">Palmeira, Mauricio</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Haipeng+%28Allan%29%22">Chen, Haipeng (Allan)</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Consumer+Research%22">Journal of Consumer Research</searchLink>. Aug2026, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p390-408. 19p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Marketing+forecasting%22">Marketing forecasting</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Consumer+behavior%22">Consumer behavior</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Shopping%22">Shopping</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Probability+theory%22">Probability theory</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence%22">Confidence</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Marketers make various forecasts, including those about new products, financial instruments, sporting events, and medical procedures, to influence consumer decisions. In communicating the likelihood that a forecaster assigns to an outcome, the forecaster can refer to their confidence in the outcome (e.g. "I'm 30% confident") or the probability of the outcome (e.g. "There is a 30% probability"). The authors propose that the choice of language (e.g. probability vs. confidence) affects the perceptions of forecasters, yielding predictable consequences on consumer decisions. Specifically, some languages (e.g. confident/sure/certain) encourage internal attributions (e.g. to a forecaster), whereas other languages (e.g. probability/likelihood/chance) encourage external attributions (e.g. to an outcome). As a result, expressions of a forecaster's confidence (vs. outcome probability) make the forecaster look less competent, especially when the likelihood of the outcome is low. A series of studies shows the effect in various consumption scenarios. The effect is mediated by internal (vs. external) attributions, influences real betting decisions, and is mitigated when the likelihood is high and among consumers with a weaker tendency to make internal attributions (i.e. a weaker correspondence bias). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=enr&AN=195476960
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1093/jcr/ucaf043
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 390
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Marketing forecasting
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Consumer behavior
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Decision making
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Shopping
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Probability theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The "Confidence" Trap: When the Likelihood Is Low, Forecasters Look Less Competent When They Refer to Their Confidence in an Outcome Rather Than Its Probability.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Palmeira, Mauricio
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chen, Haipeng (Allan)
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00935301
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 53
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Consumer Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1