Integrating Machine Learning and AHP for Data-Driven Asset Renewal Prioritization in Power Distribution Systems.
Saved in:
| Title: | Integrating Machine Learning and AHP for Data-Driven Asset Renewal Prioritization in Power Distribution Systems. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Santos, Igor M. A.1 (AUTHOR) igor.santos@ee.ufcg.edu.br, Vilar, Pablo B.1,2 (AUTHOR), Vieira, Breno A.1,3 (AUTHOR), Melo, João V. J. S.1,4 (AUTHOR), Galdino, Giovanny M. B.1 (AUTHOR), Leite Neto, Antonio F.1,2 (AUTHOR), Lira, George R. S.1,3 (AUTHOR), Sgotti, Virgínia A. C.2,4 (AUTHOR), Benítez, Ana G.3 (AUTHOR), Laube, Dirceu4 (AUTHOR), Macedo, Maycon R.4 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Energies (19961073). Aug2026, Vol. 19 Issue 15, p3594. 32p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Machine learning, *Analytic hierarchy process, *Statistical decision making, *Electric power distribution grids, *Condition-based maintenance, *Remaining useful life, *Electric power management |
| Abstract: | This paper proposes an integrated framework for predictive asset management in electric power distribution systems by combining machine learning with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Distinct utility datasets were used according to the characteristics of each prediction task. Annual preventive- and corrective-maintenance records, including maintenance cost and frequency, covered the period from 2016 to 2023, whereas the SAIDI and SAIFI annual time series covered the period from 2014 to 2023. Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimation was based on static asset-level records from the entire available equipment stock and therefore was not associated with a single time-series interval. Multiple machine learning algorithms were evaluated independently for each Type of Utility Component (TUC), and the best-performing models were selected according to their validation errors. The resulting predictions were incorporated into a two-level AHP hierarchy that integrates technical, economic, operational, and regulatory criteria for portfolio-level asset-renewal prioritization. For RUL estimation, the selected TUC-specific models reduced the mean MAE from 11.33 years for the historical-mean baseline to 2.70 years, corresponding to an absolute improvement of 8.63 years and a relative reduction of 76.15%. The resulting priority ranking was evaluated retrospectively using moving-average, cumulative-gain, and lift analyses. The top 20% of ranked assets captured 29.61% of the observed corrective-maintenance occurrences, corresponding to a lift of 1.4806 relative to random selection. The cumulative-gain curve yielded an area under the curve of 0.6337 and a ranking Gini coefficient of 0.2674, indicating moderate positive discrimination across the asset portfolio. These results show that the proposed ML–AHP framework can support the allocation of inspection, engineering-assessment, and renewal resources toward assets with comparatively greater maintenance demand and operational relevance. The framework provides a structured, data-driven decision-support approach for utility asset-renewal planning, while prospective field implementation remains necessary to quantify reductions in failures, corrective maintenance, continuity penalties, and total expenditure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Database: | Energy & Power Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: enr DbLabel: Energy & Power Source An: 196241195 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Integrating Machine Learning and AHP for Data-Driven Asset Renewal Prioritization in Power Distribution Systems. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Santos%2C+Igor+M%2E+A%2E%22">Santos, Igor M. A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> igor.santos@ee.ufcg.edu.br</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vilar%2C+Pablo+B%2E%22">Vilar, Pablo B.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vieira%2C+Breno+A%2E%22">Vieira, Breno A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Melo%2C+João+V%2E+J%2E+S%2E%22">Melo, João V. J. S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Galdino%2C+Giovanny+M%2E+B%2E%22">Galdino, Giovanny M. B.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leite+Neto%2C+Antonio+F%2E%22">Leite Neto, Antonio F.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lira%2C+George+R%2E+S%2E%22">Lira, George R. S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sgotti%2C+Virgínia+A%2E+C%2E%22">Sgotti, Virgínia A. C.</searchLink><relatesTo>2,4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Benítez%2C+Ana+G%2E%22">Benítez, Ana G.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Laube%2C+Dirceu%22">Laube, Dirceu</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Macedo%2C+Maycon+R%2E%22">Macedo, Maycon R.</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Energies+%2819961073%29%22">Energies (19961073)</searchLink>. Aug2026, Vol. 19 Issue 15, p3594. 32p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Machine+learning%22">Machine learning</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Analytic+hierarchy+process%22">Analytic hierarchy process</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+decision+making%22">Statistical decision making</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electric+power+distribution+grids%22">Electric power distribution grids</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Condition-based+maintenance%22">Condition-based maintenance</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Remaining+useful+life%22">Remaining useful life</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electric+power+management%22">Electric power management</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This paper proposes an integrated framework for predictive asset management in electric power distribution systems by combining machine learning with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Distinct utility datasets were used according to the characteristics of each prediction task. Annual preventive- and corrective-maintenance records, including maintenance cost and frequency, covered the period from 2016 to 2023, whereas the SAIDI and SAIFI annual time series covered the period from 2014 to 2023. Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimation was based on static asset-level records from the entire available equipment stock and therefore was not associated with a single time-series interval. Multiple machine learning algorithms were evaluated independently for each Type of Utility Component (TUC), and the best-performing models were selected according to their validation errors. The resulting predictions were incorporated into a two-level AHP hierarchy that integrates technical, economic, operational, and regulatory criteria for portfolio-level asset-renewal prioritization. For RUL estimation, the selected TUC-specific models reduced the mean MAE from 11.33 years for the historical-mean baseline to 2.70 years, corresponding to an absolute improvement of 8.63 years and a relative reduction of 76.15%. The resulting priority ranking was evaluated retrospectively using moving-average, cumulative-gain, and lift analyses. The top 20% of ranked assets captured 29.61% of the observed corrective-maintenance occurrences, corresponding to a lift of 1.4806 relative to random selection. The cumulative-gain curve yielded an area under the curve of 0.6337 and a ranking Gini coefficient of 0.2674, indicating moderate positive discrimination across the asset portfolio. These results show that the proposed ML–AHP framework can support the allocation of inspection, engineering-assessment, and renewal resources toward assets with comparatively greater maintenance demand and operational relevance. The framework provides a structured, data-driven decision-support approach for utility asset-renewal planning, while prospective field implementation remains necessary to quantify reductions in failures, corrective maintenance, continuity penalties, and total expenditure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=enr&AN=196241195 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.3390/en19153594 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 32 StartPage: 3594 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Machine learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Analytic hierarchy process Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical decision making Type: general – SubjectFull: Electric power distribution grids Type: general – SubjectFull: Condition-based maintenance Type: general – SubjectFull: Remaining useful life Type: general – SubjectFull: Electric power management Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Integrating Machine Learning and AHP for Data-Driven Asset Renewal Prioritization in Power Distribution Systems. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Santos, Igor M. A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Vilar, Pablo B. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Vieira, Breno A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Melo, João V. J. S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Galdino, Giovanny M. B. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Leite Neto, Antonio F. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lira, George R. S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sgotti, Virgínia A. C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Benítez, Ana G. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Laube, Dirceu – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Macedo, Maycon R. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Text: Aug2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 19961073 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 19 – Type: issue Value: 15 Titles: – TitleFull: Energies (19961073) Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |