View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Capacity constraints as a trigger for high growth.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Coad, Alex1 (AUTHOR) alex.coad@waseda.jp, Domnick, Clemens2 (AUTHOR), Flachenecker, Florian3,4 (AUTHOR), Harasztosi, Peter5 (AUTHOR), Janiri, Mario Lorenzo2 (AUTHOR), Pal, Rozalia5 (AUTHOR), Teruel, Mercedes6 (AUTHOR) mercedes.teruel@urv.cat
Source: Small Business Economics. Oct2022, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p893-923. 31p. 3 Diagrams, 8 Charts, 5 Graphs.
Subject Terms: *Businesspeople, *New product development, *Theory of the firm, *Sales statistics
Abstract: High-growth enterprises (HGEs) have a large economic impact but are notoriously hard to predict. Previous research has linked high-growth episodes to the configuration of lumpy indivisible resources inside firms, such that high capacity utilisation levels might stimulate future growth. We theorize that firms reaching critically high capacity utilisation levels reach a "trigger point" involving either broad-based investment in further growth or shrinking back to previous levels. We analyze EIBIS survey data (matched to ORBIS) which features a question on time-varying capacity utilisation. Overcapacity is a transitory state. Firms enter into overcapacity after a period of the rapid growth of sales and profits, and the years surrounding overcapacity have higher employment growth rates. Firms operating at overcapacity make incremental investments (e.g. capacity expansion, process improvements and modern machinery) rather than investing in R&D and new product development. We find support for the "fork in the road" hypothesis: for some firms, overcapacity is associated with launching into massive investments and subsequent sales growth, while for other firms, overcapacity is negatively related to both investments and sales growth. Plain English Summary: Operating above maximum capacity is like a "fork in the road": while some firms shrink back to stay within existing capacity constraints, others respond by launching into broad-based growth. We develop a theory of firm growth, according to which some firms are better positioned for subsequent growth, depending upon their state of capacity utilisation. Firms with plenty of slack capacity can easily grow within the bounds of existing capacity constraints. Firms that are already operating above maximum capacity cannot grow by drawing on slack resources, but instead, their growth requires a broad-based investment in many interconnected areas. Our statistical analysis shows that operating above maximum capacity is relatively rare and unlikely to persist and seems due to rising demand. Some firms respond to being above maximum capacity by slowing down and adapting to existing capacity constraints, while others treat overcapacity as a "trigger point" that launches them into subsequent growth. Our results are of interest to those seeking to understand and predict firm growth: investors, entrepreneurs, academics and policymakers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Entrepreneurial Studies Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ent
DbLabel: Entrepreneurial Studies Source
An: 159438933
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Coad%2C+Alex%22">Coad, Alex</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> alex.coad@waseda.jp</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Domnick%2C+Clemens%22">Domnick, Clemens</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Flachenecker%2C+Florian%22">Flachenecker, Florian</searchLink><relatesTo>3,4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Harasztosi%2C+Peter%22">Harasztosi, Peter</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Janiri%2C+Mario+Lorenzo%22">Janiri, Mario Lorenzo</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pal%2C+Rozalia%22">Pal, Rozalia</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Teruel%2C+Mercedes%22">Teruel, Mercedes</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> mercedes.teruel@urv.cat</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Small+Business+Economics%22">Small Business Economics</searchLink>. Oct2022, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p893-923. 31p. 3 Diagrams, 8 Charts, 5 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Businesspeople%22">Businesspeople</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22New+product+development%22">New product development</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theory+of+the+firm%22">Theory of the firm</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sales+statistics%22">Sales statistics</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: High-growth enterprises (HGEs) have a large economic impact but are notoriously hard to predict. Previous research has linked high-growth episodes to the configuration of lumpy indivisible resources inside firms, such that high capacity utilisation levels might stimulate future growth. We theorize that firms reaching critically high capacity utilisation levels reach a "trigger point" involving either broad-based investment in further growth or shrinking back to previous levels. We analyze EIBIS survey data (matched to ORBIS) which features a question on time-varying capacity utilisation. Overcapacity is a transitory state. Firms enter into overcapacity after a period of the rapid growth of sales and profits, and the years surrounding overcapacity have higher employment growth rates. Firms operating at overcapacity make incremental investments (e.g. capacity expansion, process improvements and modern machinery) rather than investing in R&D and new product development. We find support for the "fork in the road" hypothesis: for some firms, overcapacity is associated with launching into massive investments and subsequent sales growth, while for other firms, overcapacity is negatively related to both investments and sales growth. Plain English Summary: Operating above maximum capacity is like a "fork in the road": while some firms shrink back to stay within existing capacity constraints, others respond by launching into broad-based growth. We develop a theory of firm growth, according to which some firms are better positioned for subsequent growth, depending upon their state of capacity utilisation. Firms with plenty of slack capacity can easily grow within the bounds of existing capacity constraints. Firms that are already operating above maximum capacity cannot grow by drawing on slack resources, but instead, their growth requires a broad-based investment in many interconnected areas. Our statistical analysis shows that operating above maximum capacity is relatively rare and unlikely to persist and seems due to rising demand. Some firms respond to being above maximum capacity by slowing down and adapting to existing capacity constraints, while others treat overcapacity as a "trigger point" that launches them into subsequent growth. Our results are of interest to those seeking to understand and predict firm growth: investors, entrepreneurs, academics and policymakers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ent&AN=159438933
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11187-021-00558-6
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 31
        StartPage: 893
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Businesspeople
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: New product development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Theory of the firm
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sales statistics
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Capacity constraints as a trigger for high growth.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Coad, Alex
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Domnick, Clemens
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Flachenecker, Florian
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Harasztosi, Peter
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Janiri, Mario Lorenzo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pal, Rozalia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Teruel, Mercedes
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: Oct2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0921898X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 59
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Small Business Economics
              Type: main
ResultId 1