Social Darwinism Revisited: How four critics altered the meaning of a near-obsolete term, greatly increased its usage, and thereby changed social science.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Hodgson, Geoffrey M.1 (AUTHOR) g.hodgson2@lboro.ac.uk
Source: Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Apr2024, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p403-427. 25p.
Subject Terms: *Free enterprise, *Databases, Social scientists, Biological evolution, English language
People: Hofstadter, Richard, 1916-1970, Spencer, Herbert, 1820-1903
Abstract: Many social scientists still resist Darwinian insights. A possible reason for this is a fear of being associated with Social Darwinism. This article updates a 2002 search for appearances of Social Darwinism in articles and reviews on the JSTOR database. This database has since increased substantially in size, and it now includes far more publications in languages other than English. Use of the term Social Darwinism was rare before the 1940s. Talcott Parsons used it in 1932 to criticise the analytic use of the core Darwinian concepts in social science. Subsequently, and for the first time, Herbert Spencer and Willam Graham Sumner were described as Social Darwinists. This led to a major change of meaning of the term, where it was associated more, but not entirely, with free market individualism. With this reconstructed meaning, a 1944 bestselling book by Richard Hofstadter provoked an explosion of usage of the term in postwar years. The continuing use of the term is partly ideologically motivated and has served to deter consideration of Darwinian ideas in social science. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Entrepreneurial Studies Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ent
DbLabel: Entrepreneurial Studies Source
An: 179295286
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hodgson%2C+Geoffrey+M%2E%22">Hodgson, Geoffrey M.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> g.hodgson2@lboro.ac.uk</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Evolutionary+Economics%22">Journal of Evolutionary Economics</searchLink>. Apr2024, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p403-427. 25p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Free+enterprise%22">Free enterprise</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Databases%22">Databases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+scientists%22">Social scientists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biological+evolution%22">Biological evolution</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+language%22">English language</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectPerson
  Label: People
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="PE" term="%22Hofstadter%2C+Richard%2C+1916-1970%22">Hofstadter, Richard, 1916-1970</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="PE" term="%22Spencer%2C+Herbert%2C+1820-1903%22">Spencer, Herbert, 1820-1903</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Many social scientists still resist Darwinian insights. A possible reason for this is a fear of being associated with Social Darwinism. This article updates a 2002 search for appearances of Social Darwinism in articles and reviews on the JSTOR database. This database has since increased substantially in size, and it now includes far more publications in languages other than English. Use of the term Social Darwinism was rare before the 1940s. Talcott Parsons used it in 1932 to criticise the analytic use of the core Darwinian concepts in social science. Subsequently, and for the first time, Herbert Spencer and Willam Graham Sumner were described as Social Darwinists. This led to a major change of meaning of the term, where it was associated more, but not entirely, with free market individualism. With this reconstructed meaning, a 1944 bestselling book by Richard Hofstadter provoked an explosion of usage of the term in postwar years. The continuing use of the term is partly ideologically motivated and has served to deter consideration of Darwinian ideas in social science. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ent&AN=179295286
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00191-024-00862-w
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 25
        StartPage: 403
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Free enterprise
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Databases
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social scientists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Biological evolution
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English language
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hofstadter, Richard, 1916-1970
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Spencer, Herbert, 1820-1903
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Social Darwinism Revisited: How four critics altered the meaning of a near-obsolete term, greatly increased its usage, and thereby changed social science.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hodgson, Geoffrey M.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Text: Apr2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09369937
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 34
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Evolutionary Economics
              Type: main
ResultId 1