View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Peer review: A highly valuable service but less recognized.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Woldeamanuel, Asegid Getachew1 (AUTHOR) asewoldeam@gmail.com
Source: Journal of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. 3/3/2025, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1-6. 6p.
Subject Terms: *Quality control, *Decision making, *Scholarly peer review, Periodical articles, Originality, Manuscripts
Abstract: Peer review is an independent process of checking the quality and rigor of articles submitted to a journal. It is considered as a hallmark of the reputability and excellence of a journal. Peer reviewers spend a significant portion of their time and energy to assess the significance, originality and rigor of manuscripts and thereby help editors make an informed decision. The review process, typically enhances the quality and relevance of submitted manuscripts. Needless to say, Peer reviewers play a crucial role in ensuring research is done following accepted scientific procedures and sound methodologies. However, the contribution that previewers make to the advancement of knowledge has not sufficiently been recognized. I argue that it is unjustifiable to consider the free services of peer reviewers for granted. I also propose alternative ways of recognizing the efforts of peer reviewers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Entrepreneurial Studies Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ent
DbLabel: Entrepreneurial Studies Source
An: 183407003
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Woldeamanuel%2C+Asegid+Getachew%22">Woldeamanuel, Asegid Getachew</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> asewoldeam@gmail.com</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Innovation+%26+Entrepreneurship%22">Journal of Innovation & Entrepreneurship</searchLink>. 3/3/2025, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1-6. 6p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+control%22">Quality control</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scholarly+peer+review%22">Scholarly peer review</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Periodical+articles%22">Periodical articles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Originality%22">Originality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Manuscripts%22">Manuscripts</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Peer review is an independent process of checking the quality and rigor of articles submitted to a journal. It is considered as a hallmark of the reputability and excellence of a journal. Peer reviewers spend a significant portion of their time and energy to assess the significance, originality and rigor of manuscripts and thereby help editors make an informed decision. The review process, typically enhances the quality and relevance of submitted manuscripts. Needless to say, Peer reviewers play a crucial role in ensuring research is done following accepted scientific procedures and sound methodologies. However, the contribution that previewers make to the advancement of knowledge has not sufficiently been recognized. I argue that it is unjustifiable to consider the free services of peer reviewers for granted. I also propose alternative ways of recognizing the efforts of peer reviewers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ent&AN=183407003
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1186/s13731-025-00479-8
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 6
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Quality control
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Decision making
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scholarly peer review
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Periodical articles
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Originality
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Manuscripts
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Peer review: A highly valuable service but less recognized.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Woldeamanuel, Asegid Getachew
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 03
              M: 03
              Text: 3/3/2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 21925372
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 14
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Innovation & Entrepreneurship
              Type: main
ResultId 1