How Do Content Producers Respond to Engagement on Social Media Platforms?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Mummalaneni, Simha1 (AUTHOR) nmummalaneni@wm.edu, Yoganarasimhan, Hema2 (AUTHOR) hemay@uw.edu, Pathak, Varad3 (AUTHOR) pathak.varad@gmail.com
Source: Marketing Science (INFORMS). Jul/Aug2026, Vol. 45 Issue 4, p791-815. 25p.
Subject Terms: *User-generated content, *Field research, Individual differences, Digital technology, Human behavior, Instrumental variables (Statistics)
Reviews & Products: Twitter (Web resource)
Abstract: We examine how receiving engagement affects users' subsequent behavior on social media platform, using a large-scale field experiment from Twitter. When creating new content, many social media users hope to receive engagement from other users. This research examines how receiving that engagement affects different users' subsequent behavior on the platform. We address this question through a field experiment on Twitter in which some users' posts were purposefully shown more often to other users, which (on average) increased the amount of engagement they received. We estimate a doubly robust instrumental variable model that allows us to estimate individual-level treatment effects, and we find substantial heterogeneity across users in terms of how they respond to additional engagement: most users do not significantly change their behavior, but some users respond by substantially increasing their time spent on the platform, posting more content, and engaging more with other users' content. Users who respond most strongly are systematically different than the rest of the user base on observable pre-experiment user metrics, thereby providing substantive insights about which users value engagement very highly. Our results demonstrate how social media platforms can increase content creation, content consumption, and overall usage of the platform by focusing on this group of users and targeting them with interventions that are intended to increase the amount of engagement they receive. History: Tat Chan served as the senior editor for this article. Supplemental Material: The online appendices and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0178. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Entrepreneurial Studies Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ent
DbLabel: Entrepreneurial Studies Source
An: 195284038
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mummalaneni%2C+Simha%22">Mummalaneni, Simha</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> nmummalaneni@wm.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yoganarasimhan%2C+Hema%22">Yoganarasimhan, Hema</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> hemay@uw.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pathak%2C+Varad%22">Pathak, Varad</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> pathak.varad@gmail.com</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Marketing+Science+%28INFORMS%29%22">Marketing Science (INFORMS)</searchLink>. Jul/Aug2026, Vol. 45 Issue 4, p791-815. 25p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22User-generated+content%22">User-generated content</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Field+research%22">Field research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+differences%22">Individual differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Digital+technology%22">Digital technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+behavior%22">Human behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instrumental+variables+%28Statistics%29%22">Instrumental variables (Statistics)</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectProduct
  Label: Reviews & Products
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="PS" term="%22Twitter+%28Web+resource%29%22">Twitter (Web resource)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: We examine how receiving engagement affects users' subsequent behavior on social media platform, using a large-scale field experiment from Twitter. When creating new content, many social media users hope to receive engagement from other users. This research examines how receiving that engagement affects different users' subsequent behavior on the platform. We address this question through a field experiment on Twitter in which some users' posts were purposefully shown more often to other users, which (on average) increased the amount of engagement they received. We estimate a doubly robust instrumental variable model that allows us to estimate individual-level treatment effects, and we find substantial heterogeneity across users in terms of how they respond to additional engagement: most users do not significantly change their behavior, but some users respond by substantially increasing their time spent on the platform, posting more content, and engaging more with other users' content. Users who respond most strongly are systematically different than the rest of the user base on observable pre-experiment user metrics, thereby providing substantive insights about which users value engagement very highly. Our results demonstrate how social media platforms can increase content creation, content consumption, and overall usage of the platform by focusing on this group of users and targeting them with interventions that are intended to increase the amount of engagement they receive. History: Tat Chan served as the senior editor for this article. Supplemental Material: The online appendices and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0178. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ent&AN=195284038
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1287/mksc.2023.0178
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 25
        StartPage: 791
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: User-generated content
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Field research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Individual differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Digital technology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Human behavior
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Instrumental variables (Statistics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Twitter (Web resource)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: How Do Content Producers Respond to Engagement on Social Media Platforms?
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mummalaneni, Simha
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yoganarasimhan, Hema
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pathak, Varad
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul/Aug2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 07322399
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 45
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Marketing Science (INFORMS)
              Type: main
ResultId 1