Contracts as safeguards against conflicts in science–society research collaborations: the influence of academics' engagement motives and research orientation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Püttmann, Vitus1 (AUTHOR) puettmann@wipol.uni-hannover.de
Source: Journal of Technology Transfer. Aug2026, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p2399-2424. 26p.
Subject Terms: *Contracts, *Conflict management, *Transaction costs, Motivation (Psychology), Human behavior, Cooperative research
Geographic Terms: Germany
Abstract: Research collaborations between science and society require that differing sectoral logics and objectives are reconciled, which creates potential for conflict. Suitable collaboration contracts are an important means to handle such conflicts and therefore crucial for collaboration success. Despite academics' relevance for these collaborations and their latitude in deciding whether and how to engage with society, their influence on the design of collaboration contracts has been largely neglected. This paper investigates how two ways in which academics differ, namely, their motives behind cooperating with society and the orientation of their research toward either more basic or more applied questions, influence the design of contracts for the research collaborations they are involved in. Drawing on transaction cost theory reasoning, hypotheses on the influence of the two factors are developed and subsequently tested empirically using survey data from 2,048 professors in Germany. In line with the hypotheses, the empirical results show that coordination and control mechanisms are specified more comprehensively in collaboration contracts when professors' motives and research orientation deepen the line of conflict between partners' objectives and increase the uncertainties related to a collaboration project. A closer consideration of academics' influence on the design of contracts for research collaborations thus appears relevant for further research as well as policy and management efforts directed at exchange relations between science and society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Entrepreneurial Studies Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ent
DbLabel: Entrepreneurial Studies Source
An: 195542986
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Püttmann%2C+Vitus%22">Püttmann, Vitus</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> puettmann@wipol.uni-hannover.de</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Technology+Transfer%22">Journal of Technology Transfer</searchLink>. Aug2026, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p2399-2424. 26p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Contracts%22">Contracts</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conflict+management%22">Conflict management</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transaction+costs%22">Transaction costs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motivation+%28Psychology%29%22">Motivation (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+behavior%22">Human behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cooperative+research%22">Cooperative research</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Germany%22">Germany</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Research collaborations between science and society require that differing sectoral logics and objectives are reconciled, which creates potential for conflict. Suitable collaboration contracts are an important means to handle such conflicts and therefore crucial for collaboration success. Despite academics' relevance for these collaborations and their latitude in deciding whether and how to engage with society, their influence on the design of collaboration contracts has been largely neglected. This paper investigates how two ways in which academics differ, namely, their motives behind cooperating with society and the orientation of their research toward either more basic or more applied questions, influence the design of contracts for the research collaborations they are involved in. Drawing on transaction cost theory reasoning, hypotheses on the influence of the two factors are developed and subsequently tested empirically using survey data from 2,048 professors in Germany. In line with the hypotheses, the empirical results show that coordination and control mechanisms are specified more comprehensively in collaboration contracts when professors' motives and research orientation deepen the line of conflict between partners' objectives and increase the uncertainties related to a collaboration project. A closer consideration of academics' influence on the design of contracts for research collaborations thus appears relevant for further research as well as policy and management efforts directed at exchange relations between science and society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ent&AN=195542986
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10961-025-10260-4
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 26
        StartPage: 2399
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Contracts
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Conflict management
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Transaction costs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Motivation (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Human behavior
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cooperative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Germany
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Contracts as safeguards against conflicts in science–society research collaborations: the influence of academics' engagement motives and research orientation.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Püttmann, Vitus
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 08929912
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 51
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Technology Transfer
              Type: main
ResultId 1