CRITERION VARIABLES FOR THE EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE PRACTICES, A TAXONOMY OF GUIDANCE OBJECTIVES. NATIONAL STUDY OF GUIDANCE, PHASE I, PRELIMINARY REPORT.
Saved in:
| Title: | CRITERION VARIABLES FOR THE EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE PRACTICES, A TAXONOMY OF GUIDANCE OBJECTIVES. NATIONAL STUDY OF GUIDANCE, PHASE I, PRELIMINARY REPORT. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Missouri Univ., Columbia. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 34 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Descriptors: | Classification, Evaluation, Guidance Programs, Objectives, Research Criteria |
| Abstract: | THE ESTABLISHMENT OF EVALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR GUIDANCE OBJECTIVES IS AFFECTED BY THREE MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS--(1) SPECIFYING GUIDANCE OBJECTIVES, (2) TRANSLATING THESE OBJECTIVES INTO DESIRED BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES, AND (3) MEASURING AND REPORTING THESE BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES. THE MAJOR PROBLEM IS FINDING UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTABLE OBJECTIVES WHICH ARE SPECIFIC ENOUGH FOR RESEARCH AND YET EMPHASIZE THE INDIVIDUAL. AN ATTEMPT IS MADE TO IDENTIFY GUIDANCE OBJECTIVES IN TERMS OF THE PRIMARY DEVELOPMENTAL AND PROBLEM NEEDS OF STUDENTS WITHIN THEIR EDUCATIONAL, VOCATIONAL, AND SOCIAL DOMAINS. WITHIN EACH OF THESE DOMAINS, OBJECTIVES ARE CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO A HIERARCHY OF DEVELOPMENTAL LEVELS. THE FIRST LEVEL CONTAINS PERCEPTUALIZATION OBJECTIVES WHICH INCLUDE KNOWLEDGE OF, AND CONCERN WITH, ASPECTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE SELF. THE SECOND LEVEL EMPHASIZES CONCEPTUALIZATION OBJECTIVES AND RESPONSES TO PERCEPTIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE SELF. AT THE THIRD AND HIGHEST LEVEL ARE GENERALIZATION OBJECTIVES WHICH ALLOW THE INDIVIDUAL TO (1) ACCOMODATE CULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DEMANDS, (2) ACHIEVE SATISFACTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSACTIONS, AND (3) EXPERIENCE MASTERY OF SPECIFIC TASKS. EXAMPLES OF SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA FOR GUIDANCE ARE PRESENTED IN TERMS OF THE EDUCATIONAL, VOCATIONAL, AND SOCIAL DOMAINS. (SK) |
| Entry Date: | 1968 |
| Accession Number: | ED012471 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED012471 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED012471 AccessLevel: 3 PubTypeId: unknown PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: CRITERION VARIABLES FOR THE EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE PRACTICES, A TAXONOMY OF GUIDANCE OBJECTIVES. NATIONAL STUDY OF GUIDANCE, PHASE I, PRELIMINARY REPORT. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Missouri+Univ%2E%2C+Columbia%2E%22">Missouri Univ., Columbia.</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 34 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classification%22">Classification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation%22">Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Guidance+Programs%22">Guidance Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Objectives%22">Objectives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Criteria%22">Research Criteria</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: THE ESTABLISHMENT OF EVALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR GUIDANCE OBJECTIVES IS AFFECTED BY THREE MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS--(1) SPECIFYING GUIDANCE OBJECTIVES, (2) TRANSLATING THESE OBJECTIVES INTO DESIRED BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES, AND (3) MEASURING AND REPORTING THESE BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES. THE MAJOR PROBLEM IS FINDING UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTABLE OBJECTIVES WHICH ARE SPECIFIC ENOUGH FOR RESEARCH AND YET EMPHASIZE THE INDIVIDUAL. AN ATTEMPT IS MADE TO IDENTIFY GUIDANCE OBJECTIVES IN TERMS OF THE PRIMARY DEVELOPMENTAL AND PROBLEM NEEDS OF STUDENTS WITHIN THEIR EDUCATIONAL, VOCATIONAL, AND SOCIAL DOMAINS. WITHIN EACH OF THESE DOMAINS, OBJECTIVES ARE CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO A HIERARCHY OF DEVELOPMENTAL LEVELS. THE FIRST LEVEL CONTAINS PERCEPTUALIZATION OBJECTIVES WHICH INCLUDE KNOWLEDGE OF, AND CONCERN WITH, ASPECTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE SELF. THE SECOND LEVEL EMPHASIZES CONCEPTUALIZATION OBJECTIVES AND RESPONSES TO PERCEPTIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE SELF. AT THE THIRD AND HIGHEST LEVEL ARE GENERALIZATION OBJECTIVES WHICH ALLOW THE INDIVIDUAL TO (1) ACCOMODATE CULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DEMANDS, (2) ACHIEVE SATISFACTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSACTIONS, AND (3) EXPERIENCE MASTERY OF SPECIFIC TASKS. EXAMPLES OF SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA FOR GUIDANCE ARE PRESENTED IN TERMS OF THE EDUCATIONAL, VOCATIONAL, AND SOCIAL DOMAINS. (SK) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1968 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED012471 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED012471 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 34 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Classification Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Guidance Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Objectives Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Criteria Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: CRITERION VARIABLES FOR THE EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE PRACTICES, A TAXONOMY OF GUIDANCE OBJECTIVES. NATIONAL STUDY OF GUIDANCE, PHASE I, PRELIMINARY REPORT. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Missouri Univ., Columbia. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2025 |
| ResultId | 1 |
