View in EDS

Engineering Operational CAI.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Engineering Operational CAI.
Authors: Boessenroth, Theodore, Texas Univ., Austin. Computer-Assisted Instruction Lab.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 24
Publication Date: 1970
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
Report Number: TM-1
Descriptors: Communication Problems, Computer Assisted Instruction, Curriculum Development, Flow Charts, Programers, Programing, Programing Languages, Programing Problems
Abstract: If a course using computer-assisted instruction (CAI) is to follow the author's philosophy and design, it is important that communication between author and coder be explicit. Here, a set of definitions and flowcharts are presented which allow an author to describe precisely to the coder alternate choices which a student using the program may make. By using these sample definitions and flowcharts, it is possible for author and coder to communicate clearly. The second part of this document describes an effective collaboration between author and coder in developing a course in mathematics fundamentals. Close contact between them produced consistency of approach and product. However, turnover of staff and deadline pressure made it difficult to maintain this close contact. The staff nevertheless felt such contact is desirable. (JK)
Journal Code: RIEDEC1971
Entry Date: 1971
Accession Number: ED053533
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED053533
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED053533
AccessLevel: 3
PubTypeId: unknown
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Engineering Operational CAI.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boessenroth%2C+Theodore%22">Boessenroth, Theodore</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Texas+Univ%2E%2C+Austin%2E+Computer-Assisted+Instruction+Lab%2E%22">Texas Univ., Austin. Computer-Assisted Instruction Lab.</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 24
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1970
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
– Name: NumberReport
  Label: Report Number
  Group: ID
  Data: TM-1
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication+Problems%22">Communication Problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Assisted+Instruction%22">Computer Assisted Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Development%22">Curriculum Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Flow+Charts%22">Flow Charts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Programers%22">Programers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Programing%22">Programing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Programing+Languages%22">Programing Languages</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Programing+Problems%22">Programing Problems</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: If a course using computer-assisted instruction (CAI) is to follow the author's philosophy and design, it is important that communication between author and coder be explicit. Here, a set of definitions and flowcharts are presented which allow an author to describe precisely to the coder alternate choices which a student using the program may make. By using these sample definitions and flowcharts, it is possible for author and coder to communicate clearly. The second part of this document describes an effective collaboration between author and coder in developing a course in mathematics fundamentals. Close contact between them produced consistency of approach and product. However, turnover of staff and deadline pressure made it difficult to maintain this close contact. The staff nevertheless felt such contact is desirable. (JK)
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: Journal Code
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JC" term="%22RIEDEC1971%22">RIEDEC1971</searchLink>
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1971
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED053533
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED053533
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 24
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Communication Problems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer Assisted Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Flow Charts
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Programers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Programing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Programing Languages
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Programing Problems
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Engineering Operational CAI.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Texas Univ., Austin. Computer-Assisted Instruction Lab.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Boessenroth, Theodore
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Type: published
              Y: 1970
ResultId 1