The Interaction of Reasoning and Memory Abilities with Rule-Example Vs. Discovery Instruction in Learning an Imaginary Science. Technical Report Number 3.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Interaction of Reasoning and Memory Abilities with Rule-Example Vs. Discovery Instruction in Learning an Imaginary Science. Technical Report Number 3.
Authors: Bunderson, C. Victor, Texas Univ., Austin. Computer-Assisted Instruction Lab.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 22
Publication Date: 1971
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA. Personnel and Training Research Programs Office.
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Computer Assisted Instruction, Discovery Learning, Individual Differences, Instructional Design, Memory, Task Analysis, Teaching Methods, Transfer of Training
Abstract: Two experiments were conducted to investigate the relationships between individual difference variables and discovery vs. non-discovery instructional treatments in learning of an imaginary science. All subjects were able to learn the material, but presentation of examples and rules (non-discovery) led to more rapid learning. There was no difference between the two treatments on transfer to a higher-order task, although such a difference would have been predicted by the learning-by-discovery hypothesis. However, an interaction between treatment and reasoning ability combined with a floor effect on the number of examples to criterion measure leaves open the possibility that discovery learning may still show advantages, if only for individuals high in reasoning ability. (RH)
Notes: ARPA Project on Cognitive Abilities and Learning
Journal Code: RIEJUN1973
Entry Date: 1973
Accession Number: ED072629
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED072629
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED072629
AccessLevel: 3
PubTypeId: unknown
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Interaction of Reasoning and Memory Abilities with Rule-Example Vs. Discovery Instruction in Learning an Imaginary Science. Technical Report Number 3.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bunderson%2C+C%2E+Victor%22">Bunderson, C. Victor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Texas+Univ%2E%2C+Austin%2E+Computer-Assisted+Instruction+Lab%2E%22">Texas Univ., Austin. Computer-Assisted Instruction Lab.</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 22
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1971
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA. Personnel and Training Research Programs Office.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Assisted+Instruction%22">Computer Assisted Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discovery+Learning%22">Discovery Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+Differences%22">Individual Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Design%22">Instructional Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Memory%22">Memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+Analysis%22">Task Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transfer+of+Training%22">Transfer of Training</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Two experiments were conducted to investigate the relationships between individual difference variables and discovery vs. non-discovery instructional treatments in learning of an imaginary science. All subjects were able to learn the material, but presentation of examples and rules (non-discovery) led to more rapid learning. There was no difference between the two treatments on transfer to a higher-order task, although such a difference would have been predicted by the learning-by-discovery hypothesis. However, an interaction between treatment and reasoning ability combined with a floor effect on the number of examples to criterion measure leaves open the possibility that discovery learning may still show advantages, if only for individuals high in reasoning ability. (RH)
– Name: Note
  Label: Notes
  Group: Note
  Data: ARPA Project on Cognitive Abilities and Learning
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: Journal Code
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JC" term="%22RIEJUN1973%22">RIEJUN1973</searchLink>
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1973
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED072629
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED072629
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 22
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer Assisted Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Discovery Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Individual Differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Instructional Design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Memory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Task Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Transfer of Training
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Interaction of Reasoning and Memory Abilities with Rule-Example Vs. Discovery Instruction in Learning an Imaginary Science. Technical Report Number 3.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Texas Univ., Austin. Computer-Assisted Instruction Lab.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bunderson, C. Victor
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Type: published
              Y: 1971
ResultId 1