View in EDS

The Process of Funds Allocation Under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Second Interim Report.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Process of Funds Allocation Under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Second Interim Report.
Authors: Kim, Sung, National Bureau of Standards (DOC), Washington, DC. Technical Analysis Div.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 165
Publication Date: 1973
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Elementary and Secondary Education (DHEW/OE), Washington, DC. Div. of Compensatory Education.
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Economically Disadvantaged, Educational Finance, Educational Needs, Educational Resources, Expenditure per Student, Financial Needs, Grants, Poverty Areas, Resource Allocation, Student Distribution
Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I
Abstract: This study is derived from the Congressional mandate for a study of the various provisions involved with the 1965 Elementary Secondary Education Act Title I grant determination and distribution process. The description of Title I provisions emphasizes the process relating to the allocation of funds for local educational agencies (LEA's). The maximum LEA grant is described as the product of the number of eligible children and the amount of the basic grant per child; the allocation actually received by the LEA; however, results from the application of a procedure that reduces the amount of all entitlements to a sum that can be covered by the appropriation. The practical problems of identifying and counting the eligible children for annual grant determination are defined. These include attempting to maintain a comprehensive, accurate, and up-to-date data base. In addition, some of the issues associated with the selection of an appropriate grant per child are mentioned. These include whether the basic grants should reflect regional differences in the cost of education and/or whether they should be adjusted for areas with special needs, e.g., high concentrations of eligible children. Consideration of alternative possibilities suggests that the present enumeration of eligibles can be improved by using the so-called Orshansky poverty data from the 1970 census. ["Appendix C" is poor in legibility] (Author/JM)
Entry Date: 1973
Accession Number: ED074187
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED074187
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED074187
AccessLevel: 3
PubTypeId: unknown
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Process of Funds Allocation Under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Second Interim Report.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kim%2C+Sung%22">Kim, Sung</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22National+Bureau+of+Standards+%28DOC%29%2C+Washington%2C+DC%2E+Technical+Analysis+Div%2E%22">National Bureau of Standards (DOC), Washington, DC. Technical Analysis Div.</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 165
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1973
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: Bureau of Elementary and Secondary Education (DHEW/OE), Washington, DC. Div. of Compensatory Education.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Compensatory+Education%22">Compensatory Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disadvantaged+Youth%22">Disadvantaged Youth</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Economically+Disadvantaged%22">Economically Disadvantaged</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Finance%22">Educational Finance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Needs%22">Educational Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Resources%22">Educational Resources</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Expenditure+per+Student%22">Expenditure per Student</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Financial+Needs%22">Financial Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grants%22">Grants</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Poverty+Areas%22">Poverty Areas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Resource+Allocation%22">Resource Allocation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Distribution%22">Student Distribution</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectThesaurus
  Label: Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Elementary+and+Secondary+Education+Act+Title+I%22">Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study is derived from the Congressional mandate for a study of the various provisions involved with the 1965 Elementary Secondary Education Act Title I grant determination and distribution process. The description of Title I provisions emphasizes the process relating to the allocation of funds for local educational agencies (LEA's). The maximum LEA grant is described as the product of the number of eligible children and the amount of the basic grant per child; the allocation actually received by the LEA; however, results from the application of a procedure that reduces the amount of all entitlements to a sum that can be covered by the appropriation. The practical problems of identifying and counting the eligible children for annual grant determination are defined. These include attempting to maintain a comprehensive, accurate, and up-to-date data base. In addition, some of the issues associated with the selection of an appropriate grant per child are mentioned. These include whether the basic grants should reflect regional differences in the cost of education and/or whether they should be adjusted for areas with special needs, e.g., high concentrations of eligible children. Consideration of alternative possibilities suggests that the present enumeration of eligibles can be improved by using the so-called Orshansky poverty data from the 1970 census. ["Appendix C" is poor in legibility] (Author/JM)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1973
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED074187
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED074187
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 165
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Compensatory Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Disadvantaged Youth
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Economically Disadvantaged
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Finance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Needs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Resources
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Expenditure per Student
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Financial Needs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grants
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Poverty Areas
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Resource Allocation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Distribution
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Process of Funds Allocation Under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Second Interim Report.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: National Bureau of Standards (DOC), Washington, DC. Technical Analysis Div.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kim, Sung
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Type: published
              Y: 1973
ResultId 1