View in EDS

An Outline of Methods of Grading Student Performance.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: An Outline of Methods of Grading Student Performance.
Authors: Pascal, C. E., Geis, G. L., McGill Univ., Montreal (Quebec). Center for Learning and Development.
Source: Learning and Development. Mar 1974 5(5):1-6.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 6
Publication Date: 1974
Document Type: Journal Articles
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Pass Fail Grading, Performance Contracts
Abstract: Comments and points representing "lore" rather than proven facts are presented in this outline to summarize some of the issues raised by critics and proponents of various methods of grading rather than presenting a summary of research. Pro and con arguments are those typically advanced by proponents or detractors and are not presented as facts. Descriptions, alleged benefits, and alleged defects are listed for: (1) traditional grading, (2) pass-fail grading, and (3) a mastery model of grading. Finally, principles of grading are suggested to which any grading system ought to adhere. (RC)
Journal Code: RIEMAY1975
Entry Date: 1975
Accession Number: ED100967
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED100967
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED100967
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: An Outline of Methods of Grading Student Performance.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pascal%2C+C%2E+E%2E%22">Pascal, C. E.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Geis%2C+G%2E+L%2E%22">Geis, G. L.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McGill+Univ%2E%2C+Montreal+%28Quebec%29%2E+Center+for+Learning+and+Development%2E%22">McGill Univ., Montreal (Quebec). Center for Learning and Development.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Learning+and+Development%22"><i>Learning and Development</i></searchLink>. Mar 1974 5(5):1-6.
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 6
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1974
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grades+%28Scholastic%29%22">Grades (Scholastic)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grading%22">Grading</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pass+Fail+Grading%22">Pass Fail Grading</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Performance+Contracts%22">Performance Contracts</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Comments and points representing "lore" rather than proven facts are presented in this outline to summarize some of the issues raised by critics and proponents of various methods of grading rather than presenting a summary of research. Pro and con arguments are those typically advanced by proponents or detractors and are not presented as facts. Descriptions, alleged benefits, and alleged defects are listed for: (1) traditional grading, (2) pass-fail grading, and (3) a mastery model of grading. Finally, principles of grading are suggested to which any grading system ought to adhere. (RC)
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: Journal Code
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JC" term="%22RIEMAY1975%22">RIEMAY1975</searchLink>
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1975
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED100967
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED100967
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 6
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grades (Scholastic)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grading
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pass Fail Grading
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Performance Contracts
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: An Outline of Methods of Grading Student Performance.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: McGill Univ., Montreal (Quebec). Center for Learning and Development.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pascal, C. E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Geis, G. L.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Type: published
              Y: 1974
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 5
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Learning and Development
              Type: main
ResultId 1