Robert Anthony Reed, III, et al, Plaintiffs Vs. James A. Rhodes, et al, Defendants. Memorandum Opinion and Order [Relating to Racial Isolation in the Cleveland Public School System].
Saved in:
| Title: | Robert Anthony Reed, III, et al, Plaintiffs Vs. James A. Rhodes, et al, Defendants. Memorandum Opinion and Order [Relating to Racial Isolation in the Cleveland Public School System]. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | District Court, Cleveland, OH. Northern District of Ohio. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 200 |
| Publication Date: | 1976 |
| Document Type: | Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials |
| Descriptors: | Black Community, Black Education, Blacks, Bus Transportation, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Courts, Cultural Isolation, Desegregation Litigation, Educational Policy, Minority Groups, Public Policy, Public Schools, Racial Factors, Racial Integration, Racial Segregation, School Desegregation, Social Isolation, Special Classes, Teaching Assignment, Transfer Policy |
| Geographic Terms: | Ohio (Cleveland) |
| Abstract: | In reviewing statistics of the racial patterns in the recent history of the Cleveland public school system, as well as all of the evidence included in the voluminous record in this case, the District Court for the Northern District of Ohio sought an answer to a single question of constitutional law: to what extent, if any, were the defendants in this case, public officials and public agencies, responsible for creating or for maintaining or both the segregated situation in the Cleveland public schools. In interpreting the evidence in the record, the court faced a number of recurring questions or problems. While the evidence in this case was voluminous, one question which it did not answer directly was what the racial composition of any given residential area was at any specific time. This information was crucial in assessing the intent and effect of many of the local defendents' actions. Another issue that became one of the most sharply disputed was that of the capacity of any given school. Much documentary evidence was submitted to the court concerning specific assignment decisions of the local defendents. This evidence has, purportedly for clarity's sake, been analyzed by geographical area and within such analyses, generally in chronological order. Following this detailed examination, the court addresses the general issues of relay classes, intact busing, special transfers, faculty assignment, housing, and neighborhood school policy. (Author/AM) |
| Entry Date: | 1977 |
| Accession Number: | ED128545 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED128545 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED128545 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Government Document PubTypeId: governmentDocument PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Robert Anthony Reed, III, et al, Plaintiffs Vs. James A. Rhodes, et al, Defendants. Memorandum Opinion and Order [Relating to Racial Isolation in the Cleveland Public School System]. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22District+Court%2C+Cleveland%2C+OH%2E+Northern+District+of+Ohio%2E%22">District Court, Cleveland, OH. Northern District of Ohio.</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 200 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1976 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Black+Community%22">Black Community</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Black+Education%22">Black Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Blacks%22">Blacks</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bus+Transportation%22">Bus Transportation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Constitutional+Law%22">Constitutional Law</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Court+Litigation%22">Court Litigation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Courts%22">Courts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cultural+Isolation%22">Cultural Isolation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Desegregation+Litigation%22">Desegregation Litigation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minority+Groups%22">Minority Groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Policy%22">Public Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Schools%22">Public Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+Factors%22">Racial Factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+Integration%22">Racial Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+Segregation%22">Racial Segregation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Desegregation%22">School Desegregation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Isolation%22">Social Isolation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Special+Classes%22">Special Classes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Assignment%22">Teaching Assignment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transfer+Policy%22">Transfer Policy</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ohio+%28Cleveland%29%22">Ohio (Cleveland)</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: In reviewing statistics of the racial patterns in the recent history of the Cleveland public school system, as well as all of the evidence included in the voluminous record in this case, the District Court for the Northern District of Ohio sought an answer to a single question of constitutional law: to what extent, if any, were the defendants in this case, public officials and public agencies, responsible for creating or for maintaining or both the segregated situation in the Cleveland public schools. In interpreting the evidence in the record, the court faced a number of recurring questions or problems. While the evidence in this case was voluminous, one question which it did not answer directly was what the racial composition of any given residential area was at any specific time. This information was crucial in assessing the intent and effect of many of the local defendents' actions. Another issue that became one of the most sharply disputed was that of the capacity of any given school. Much documentary evidence was submitted to the court concerning specific assignment decisions of the local defendents. This evidence has, purportedly for clarity's sake, been analyzed by geographical area and within such analyses, generally in chronological order. Following this detailed examination, the court addresses the general issues of relay classes, intact busing, special transfers, faculty assignment, housing, and neighborhood school policy. (Author/AM) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1977 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED128545 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED128545 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 200 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Black Community Type: general – SubjectFull: Black Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Blacks Type: general – SubjectFull: Bus Transportation Type: general – SubjectFull: Constitutional Law Type: general – SubjectFull: Court Litigation Type: general – SubjectFull: Courts Type: general – SubjectFull: Cultural Isolation Type: general – SubjectFull: Desegregation Litigation Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Minority Groups Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Racial Factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Racial Integration Type: general – SubjectFull: Racial Segregation Type: general – SubjectFull: School Desegregation Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Isolation Type: general – SubjectFull: Special Classes Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Assignment Type: general – SubjectFull: Transfer Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Ohio (Cleveland) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Robert Anthony Reed, III, et al, Plaintiffs Vs. James A. Rhodes, et al, Defendants. Memorandum Opinion and Order [Relating to Racial Isolation in the Cleveland Public School System]. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: District Court, Cleveland, OH. Northern District of Ohio. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 1976 |
| ResultId | 1 |
