New Ways to Evaluate Teaching and Training Effectiveness.
Saved in:
| Title: | New Ways to Evaluate Teaching and Training Effectiveness. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Schwind, Hermann F. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 31 |
| Publication Date: | 1977 |
| Document Type: | Speeches/Meeting Papers |
| Descriptors: | Behavior Patterns, Behavior Rating Scales, Behavior Standards, Behavioral Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Literature Reviews, Measurement Instruments, Performance Specifications, Personnel Evaluation, Task Performance, Test Reliability |
| Abstract: | This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of commonly used measures of job effectiveness, concentrating on a recent development in the field, the Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS); and proposes a new approach, the Behavior Description Index (BDI), which the author contends reduces or avoids most of the shortcomings of other methods. After discussing the advantages and distinguishing features of BARS, the author refers to the main problems of currently used instruments that have been cited in the literature: Low inter-rater reliability, central tendency (inclination of rater to avoid extreme ratings), halo effect (tendency to assign the same rating to each factor being rated), and leniency effect (tendency of supervisors to overrate subordinates). Two shortcomings not dealt with in the literature reviewed are also presented: Waste of valuable information and multidimensionality. The paper then examines the characteristics of the BDI and claims advantages of the new scale over other scales (for example, that the BDI uses behavioral criteria; uses a larger sample of the total job behavior domain than BARS; has less leniency, halo, and central tendency effects; and probably has higher inter-rater reliability). Implications of the use of the new instrument in performance and training evaluation are discussed. References and examples of statements from the BARS are appended. (LMS) |
| Notes: | Paper presented at the Adult Education Research Conference (Minneapolis, Minnesota, April 1977) |
| Journal Code: | RIEDEC1977 |
| Entry Date: | 1977 |
| Accession Number: | ED141507 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED141507 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED141507 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Conference PubTypeId: conference PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: New Ways to Evaluate Teaching and Training Effectiveness. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schwind%2C+Hermann+F%2E%22">Schwind, Hermann F.</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 31 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1977 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Speeches/Meeting Papers – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior+Patterns%22">Behavior Patterns</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior+Rating+Scales%22">Behavior Rating Scales</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior+Standards%22">Behavior Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavioral+Objectives%22">Behavioral Objectives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Criteria%22">Evaluation Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Literature+Reviews%22">Literature Reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measurement+Instruments%22">Measurement Instruments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Performance+Specifications%22">Performance Specifications</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Personnel+Evaluation%22">Personnel Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+Performance%22">Task Performance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Reliability%22">Test Reliability</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of commonly used measures of job effectiveness, concentrating on a recent development in the field, the Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS); and proposes a new approach, the Behavior Description Index (BDI), which the author contends reduces or avoids most of the shortcomings of other methods. After discussing the advantages and distinguishing features of BARS, the author refers to the main problems of currently used instruments that have been cited in the literature: Low inter-rater reliability, central tendency (inclination of rater to avoid extreme ratings), halo effect (tendency to assign the same rating to each factor being rated), and leniency effect (tendency of supervisors to overrate subordinates). Two shortcomings not dealt with in the literature reviewed are also presented: Waste of valuable information and multidimensionality. The paper then examines the characteristics of the BDI and claims advantages of the new scale over other scales (for example, that the BDI uses behavioral criteria; uses a larger sample of the total job behavior domain than BARS; has less leniency, halo, and central tendency effects; and probably has higher inter-rater reliability). Implications of the use of the new instrument in performance and training evaluation are discussed. References and examples of statements from the BARS are appended. (LMS) – Name: Note Label: Notes Group: Note Data: Paper presented at the Adult Education Research Conference (Minneapolis, Minnesota, April 1977) – Name: CodeSource Label: Journal Code Group: SrcInfo Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JC" term="%22RIEDEC1977%22">RIEDEC1977</searchLink> – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1977 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED141507 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED141507 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 31 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Behavior Patterns Type: general – SubjectFull: Behavior Rating Scales Type: general – SubjectFull: Behavior Standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Behavioral Objectives Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Literature Reviews Type: general – SubjectFull: Measurement Instruments Type: general – SubjectFull: Performance Specifications Type: general – SubjectFull: Personnel Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Task Performance Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Reliability Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: New Ways to Evaluate Teaching and Training Effectiveness. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Schwind, Hermann F. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 1977 |
| ResultId | 1 |