View in EDS

Structurally Integrated Versus Structurally Segregated Memory Representations: Implications for the Design of Instructional Materials.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Structurally Integrated Versus Structurally Segregated Memory Representations: Implications for the Design of Instructional Materials.
Authors: Hayes-Roth, Barbara, Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA.
Availability: Publications Department, The Rand Corporation, 1700 Main Street, Santa Monica, California 90406 ($1.50)
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 19
Publication Date: 1977
Document Type: Reports - Research
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Instructional Materials, Literature Reviews, Memory, Mnemonics, Psychological Studies, Reading Comprehension, Reading Processes, Retention (Psychology)
Abstract: Two kinds of memory organization are distinguished: segregrated versus integrated. In segregated memory organizations, related learned propositions have separate memory representations. In integrated memory organizations, memory representations of related propositions share common subrepresentations. Segregated memory organizations facilitate memory for individual propositions, while integrated memory organizations facilitate higher-order processing, such as inferencing. It is suggested that the nature of acquired memory organizations and, consequently, performance on memory and inferencing tasks can be influenced by simple wording manipulations on study materials. Experimental results support these assumptions. (Author)
Entry Date: 1977
Accession Number: ED141788
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED141788
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED141788
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Structurally Integrated Versus Structurally Segregated Memory Representations: Implications for the Design of Instructional Materials.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hayes-Roth%2C+Barbara%22">Hayes-Roth, Barbara</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rand+Corp%2E%2C+Santa+Monica%2C+CA%2E%22">Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA.</searchLink>
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Publications Department, The Rand Corporation, 1700 Main Street, Santa Monica, California 90406 ($1.50)
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 19
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1977
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Materials%22">Instructional Materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Literature+Reviews%22">Literature Reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Memory%22">Memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mnemonics%22">Mnemonics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+Studies%22">Psychological Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Comprehension%22">Reading Comprehension</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Processes%22">Reading Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Retention+%28Psychology%29%22">Retention (Psychology)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Two kinds of memory organization are distinguished: segregrated versus integrated. In segregated memory organizations, related learned propositions have separate memory representations. In integrated memory organizations, memory representations of related propositions share common subrepresentations. Segregated memory organizations facilitate memory for individual propositions, while integrated memory organizations facilitate higher-order processing, such as inferencing. It is suggested that the nature of acquired memory organizations and, consequently, performance on memory and inferencing tasks can be influenced by simple wording manipulations on study materials. Experimental results support these assumptions. (Author)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1977
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED141788
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED141788
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Instructional Materials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Literature Reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Memory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mnemonics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychological Studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reading Comprehension
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reading Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Retention (Psychology)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Structurally Integrated Versus Structurally Segregated Memory Representations: Implications for the Design of Instructional Materials.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hayes-Roth, Barbara
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Type: published
              Y: 1977
ResultId 1