Case Study of the Implementation of P.L. 94-142. Executive Summary.
Saved in:
| Title: | Case Study of the Implementation of P.L. 94-142. Executive Summary. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Blaschke, Charles L., Education Turnkey Systems, Inc., Washington, DC. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 66 |
| Publication Date: | 1979 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Bureau of Education for the Handicapped (DHEW/OE), Washington, DC. |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Compliance (Legal), Due Process, Educational Administration, Elementary Secondary Education, Exceptional Child Research, Federal Legislation, Handicapped Children, Identification, Individualized Programs, Parent Participation, Research Methodology, State Programs, Student Evaluation, Student Placement |
| Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: | Education for All Handicapped Children Act |
| Abstract: | Presented are the findings of a study to identify, analyze, and explain activities and consequences in nine local education agencies (LEAs) in three states as they implemented the major provisions of P.L. 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. Section I summarizes the background of the study and its major objectives. In Section II, the case study methodology is described. Section III addresses the nature and extent of the major consequences which arose during 2 school years of observation. Also identified are relevant changes in LEA organization, staff role behaviors, and attitudes which have occurred. Findings are reported for the following areas: childfind, assessment, placement, individualized education program, least restrictive environment, and parent involvement/due process. Among conclusions listed in a final section is that in all three states, the leadership role of the state education agency and the states' interpretations, policies, and procedures significantly influenced LEA procedures in implementing the provisions of the law. Appended materials include a conceptual model for assessing the implementation of P.L. 94-142, a summary of information gathering, and a description of the special education process. (SBH) |
| Entry Date: | 1980 |
| Accession Number: | ED175232 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED175232 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED175232 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Case Study of the Implementation of P.L. 94-142. Executive Summary. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Blaschke%2C+Charles+L%2E%22">Blaschke, Charles L.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Education+Turnkey+Systems%2C+Inc%2E%2C+Washington%2C+DC%2E%22">Education Turnkey Systems, Inc., Washington, DC.</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 66 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1979 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Bureau of Education for the Handicapped (DHEW/OE), Washington, DC. – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Compliance+%28Legal%29%22">Compliance (Legal)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Due+Process%22">Due Process</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Administration%22">Educational Administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Exceptional+Child+Research%22">Exceptional Child Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Legislation%22">Federal Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Handicapped+Children%22">Handicapped Children</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Identification%22">Identification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individualized+Programs%22">Individualized Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Parent+Participation%22">Parent Participation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Methodology%22">Research Methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Programs%22">State Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Placement%22">Student Placement</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Education+for+All+Handicapped+Children+Act%22">Education for All Handicapped Children Act</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Presented are the findings of a study to identify, analyze, and explain activities and consequences in nine local education agencies (LEAs) in three states as they implemented the major provisions of P.L. 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. Section I summarizes the background of the study and its major objectives. In Section II, the case study methodology is described. Section III addresses the nature and extent of the major consequences which arose during 2 school years of observation. Also identified are relevant changes in LEA organization, staff role behaviors, and attitudes which have occurred. Findings are reported for the following areas: childfind, assessment, placement, individualized education program, least restrictive environment, and parent involvement/due process. Among conclusions listed in a final section is that in all three states, the leadership role of the state education agency and the states' interpretations, policies, and procedures significantly influenced LEA procedures in implementing the provisions of the law. Appended materials include a conceptual model for assessing the implementation of P.L. 94-142, a summary of information gathering, and a description of the special education process. (SBH) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1980 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED175232 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED175232 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 66 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Compliance (Legal) Type: general – SubjectFull: Due Process Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Administration Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Exceptional Child Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Legislation Type: general – SubjectFull: Handicapped Children Type: general – SubjectFull: Identification Type: general – SubjectFull: Individualized Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Parent Participation Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Methodology Type: general – SubjectFull: State Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Placement Type: general – SubjectFull: Education for All Handicapped Children Act Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Case Study of the Implementation of P.L. 94-142. Executive Summary. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Education Turnkey Systems, Inc., Washington, DC. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Blaschke, Charles L. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 31 M: 05 Type: published Y: 1979 |
| ResultId | 1 |