Implications for the States Regarding the Relationship of the State Coordinating Agency with the Executive and Legislative Division of State Government in Meeting Budget Needs for Higher Education Systems.
Saved in:
| Title: | Implications for the States Regarding the Relationship of the State Coordinating Agency with the Executive and Legislative Division of State Government in Meeting Budget Needs for Higher Education Systems. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Cook, M. Olin, State Higher Education Executive Officers Association., Education Commission of the States, Denver, CO. Inservice Education Program. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 8 |
| Publication Date: | 1976 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI. |
| Document Type: | Speeches/Meeting Papers Opinion Papers |
| Descriptors: | Advisory Committees, Budgeting, College Planning, Coordination, Decision Making, Government Role, Government School Relationship, Higher Education, Institutional Cooperation, Legislators, State Agencies, State Boards of Education, State Government, State Officials, Statewide Planning |
| Geographic Terms: | Arkansas |
| Abstract: | The relationship of the state coordinating agency with the governor, the general assembly, and higher education institutions is addressed in relation to meeting budget needs for colleges and universities. Specific reference is also made to the state of Arkansas. It is suggested that the state coordinating agency should be in the position to be objective about the needs of the institutions of higher education as they relate to specific needs of the state. The agency and the board then must play the role of interpreting these to members of the general assembly and to the governor. The following principles are suggested when a state creates a coordinating agency in order to allow this agency to perform its functions adequately: (1) the staff of the coordinating agency should have a general background in higher education and should be capable of making objective decisions; (2) the staff of the agency as well as the supervisory board should have the ability to communicate educational needs and information to the governor and general assembly in terms that they can understand, and they should be able to assist in translating these needs in terms of the various other state agencies; (3) the coordinating agency should be free to look at the needs of the state without political interference from any of the various agencies of the state; (4) the budgets of higher education should be expressed in a manner that is acceptable to the governor and general assembly; (5) the budgeting process for institutions of higher education should be somewhat consistent with the budgeting for other agencies of the state government but should allow for unique differences; and (6) when budgeting for higher education is considered, competition with a particular region of the country should be avoided and allocating a continuing percentage of general revenues for education is not adivsable. (SW) |
| Entry Date: | 1981 |
| Accession Number: | ED202284 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED202284 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED202284 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Conference PubTypeId: conference PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Implications for the States Regarding the Relationship of the State Coordinating Agency with the Executive and Legislative Division of State Government in Meeting Budget Needs for Higher Education Systems. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cook%2C+M%2E+Olin%22">Cook, M. Olin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22State+Higher+Education+Executive+Officers+Association%2E%22">State Higher Education Executive Officers Association.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Education+Commission+of+the+States%2C+Denver%2C+CO%2E+Inservice+Education+Program%2E%22">Education Commission of the States, Denver, CO. Inservice Education Program.</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 8 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1976 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI. – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Speeches/Meeting Papers<br />Opinion Papers – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Advisory+Committees%22">Advisory Committees</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Budgeting%22">Budgeting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Planning%22">College Planning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Coordination%22">Coordination</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+Role%22">Government Role</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+School+Relationship%22">Government School Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Institutional+Cooperation%22">Institutional Cooperation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Legislators%22">Legislators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Agencies%22">State Agencies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Boards+of+Education%22">State Boards of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Government%22">State Government</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Officials%22">State Officials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statewide+Planning%22">Statewide Planning</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Arkansas%22">Arkansas</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The relationship of the state coordinating agency with the governor, the general assembly, and higher education institutions is addressed in relation to meeting budget needs for colleges and universities. Specific reference is also made to the state of Arkansas. It is suggested that the state coordinating agency should be in the position to be objective about the needs of the institutions of higher education as they relate to specific needs of the state. The agency and the board then must play the role of interpreting these to members of the general assembly and to the governor. The following principles are suggested when a state creates a coordinating agency in order to allow this agency to perform its functions adequately: (1) the staff of the coordinating agency should have a general background in higher education and should be capable of making objective decisions; (2) the staff of the agency as well as the supervisory board should have the ability to communicate educational needs and information to the governor and general assembly in terms that they can understand, and they should be able to assist in translating these needs in terms of the various other state agencies; (3) the coordinating agency should be free to look at the needs of the state without political interference from any of the various agencies of the state; (4) the budgets of higher education should be expressed in a manner that is acceptable to the governor and general assembly; (5) the budgeting process for institutions of higher education should be somewhat consistent with the budgeting for other agencies of the state government but should allow for unique differences; and (6) when budgeting for higher education is considered, competition with a particular region of the country should be avoided and allocating a continuing percentage of general revenues for education is not adivsable. (SW) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1981 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED202284 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED202284 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Advisory Committees Type: general – SubjectFull: Budgeting Type: general – SubjectFull: College Planning Type: general – SubjectFull: Coordination Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision Making Type: general – SubjectFull: Government Role Type: general – SubjectFull: Government School Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Institutional Cooperation Type: general – SubjectFull: Legislators Type: general – SubjectFull: State Agencies Type: general – SubjectFull: State Boards of Education Type: general – SubjectFull: State Government Type: general – SubjectFull: State Officials Type: general – SubjectFull: Statewide Planning Type: general – SubjectFull: Arkansas Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Implications for the States Regarding the Relationship of the State Coordinating Agency with the Executive and Legislative Division of State Government in Meeting Budget Needs for Higher Education Systems. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: State Higher Education Executive Officers Association. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Education Commission of the States, Denver, CO. Inservice Education Program. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cook, M. Olin IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 1976 |
| ResultId | 1 |
