Cognitive Processes in Creativity. Occasional Paper No. 18.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Cognitive Processes in Creativity. Occasional Paper No. 18.
Language: English
Authors: Hayes, John R., Center for the Study of Writing, Berkeley, CA., Center for the Study of Writing, Pittsburgh, PA.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 20
Publication Date: 1990
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC.
Document Type: Reports - Evaluative
Information Analyses
Opinion Papers
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Processes, Creative Development, Creative Thinking, Creativity, Creativity Research, Motivation, Personality Traits
Geographic Terms: U.S.; California
Abstract: What are creative people like? There is evidence that four personality traits appear to differentiate more creative from less creative people: devotion to work, independence, drive for originality, and flexibility. Creative people do not have higher intelligence quotients (IQs) or get better school grades than others--in fact, no cognitive abilities have been identified which reliably distinguish between creative and non-creative people. All of the variables which discriminate between creative and non-creative people are motivational. What cognitive factors are involved in creative acts? Years of preparation are essential for creative activity in many fields. Goal setting is the critical element in many creative acts. Other factors are: choosing good problem representations, defining good problems in ill-defined problem situations, accurately evaluating the shortcomings of your own work, and taking effective action to revise these shortcomings. The failure of cognitive ability measures such as IQ to predict creative performance indicates that creative performance has its origin not in innate cognitive abilities but rather in the motivation of the creative person. That is, differences in creativity have their origin in differences in motivation. Over a period of time, these differences in motivation cause cognitive differences (such as the acquisition of extensive knowledge) which contribute in critical ways to creative performance. These motivational and cognitive differences jointly account for the observed differences between creative and non-creative individuals, but the origin is in motivation, not in cognition. (Forty-one references are attached.) (SR)
Notes: Also appears in Glover, J.A., Ed., and Others. Handbook of Creativity, Assessment, Research, and Theory. New York, Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1989.
Journal Code: RIESEP1990
Entry Date: 1990
Accession Number: ED317947
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED317947
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED317947
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Cognitive Processes in Creativity. Occasional Paper No. 18.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hayes%2C+John+R%2E%22">Hayes, John R.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Center+for+the+Study+of+Writing%2C+Berkeley%2C+CA%2E%22">Center for the Study of Writing, Berkeley, CA.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Center+for+the+Study+of+Writing%2C+Pittsburgh%2C+PA%2E%22">Center for the Study of Writing, Pittsburgh, PA.</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 20
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1990
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC.
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Evaluative<br />Information Analyses<br />Opinion Papers
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Ability%22">Cognitive Ability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Creative+Development%22">Creative Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Creative+Thinking%22">Creative Thinking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Creativity%22">Creativity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Creativity+Research%22">Creativity Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motivation%22">Motivation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Personality+Traits%22">Personality Traits</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22U%2ES%2E%3B+California%22">U.S.; California</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: What are creative people like? There is evidence that four personality traits appear to differentiate more creative from less creative people: devotion to work, independence, drive for originality, and flexibility. Creative people do not have higher intelligence quotients (IQs) or get better school grades than others--in fact, no cognitive abilities have been identified which reliably distinguish between creative and non-creative people. All of the variables which discriminate between creative and non-creative people are motivational. What cognitive factors are involved in creative acts? Years of preparation are essential for creative activity in many fields. Goal setting is the critical element in many creative acts. Other factors are: choosing good problem representations, defining good problems in ill-defined problem situations, accurately evaluating the shortcomings of your own work, and taking effective action to revise these shortcomings. The failure of cognitive ability measures such as IQ to predict creative performance indicates that creative performance has its origin not in innate cognitive abilities but rather in the motivation of the creative person. That is, differences in creativity have their origin in differences in motivation. Over a period of time, these differences in motivation cause cognitive differences (such as the acquisition of extensive knowledge) which contribute in critical ways to creative performance. These motivational and cognitive differences jointly account for the observed differences between creative and non-creative individuals, but the origin is in motivation, not in cognition. (Forty-one references are attached.) (SR)
– Name: Note
  Label: Notes
  Group: Note
  Data: Also appears in Glover, J.A., Ed., and Others. Handbook of Creativity, Assessment, Research, and Theory. New York, Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1989.
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: Journal Code
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JC" term="%22RIESEP1990%22">RIESEP1990</searchLink>
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1990
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED317947
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED317947
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive Ability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Creative Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Creative Thinking
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Creativity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Creativity Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Motivation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Personality Traits
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: U.S.; California
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Cognitive Processes in Creativity. Occasional Paper No. 18.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Center for the Study of Writing, Berkeley, CA.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Center for the Study of Writing, Pittsburgh, PA.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hayes, John R.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 1990
ResultId 1