Raising Standards and Measuring Performance Equitably: Challenges for the National Education Goals Panel and State Assessment Systems.
Saved in:
| Title: | Raising Standards and Measuring Performance Equitably: Challenges for the National Education Goals Panel and State Assessment Systems. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Prince, Cynthia D., Forgione, Pascal D. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 14 |
| Publication Date: | 1993 |
| Document Type: | Opinion Papers |
| Descriptors: | Cultural Pluralism, Diversity (Student), Educational Assessment, Educational Change, Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education, Equal Education, Evaluation Criteria, Minority Groups, Multicultural Education, National Standards, Policy Formation, Special Needs Students, Standard Setting, State Standards, Student Evaluation |
| Geographic Terms: | Delaware |
| Abstract: | Approaches to equitable performance standards and assessment are discussed with three points of focus. First, the work of the National Education Goals Panel is described, with particular attention to Goal 3, Student Achievement and Citizenship, and the Panel's efforts to establish world-class standards of performance. National standards are assumed to include content standards, student performance standards, school delivery standards, and system performance standards. Second, four possible approaches to standard-setting for students with special needs are presented. They include the following: one standard for everybody; same standard, different conditions; different standards for different groups; and exclusion of some groups from assessment altogether. Potential advantages and disadvantages of each approach are discussed. Third, a discussion of how states are reacting to the national interest in standard-setting and assessments focuses on the standards-based approach to educational improvement adopted in Delaware. The New Directions for Education in Delaware reform plan adopted in May, 1992, clearly defines a strategy of educational standards and related assessments and accountability that will define the nature of educational change needed if Delaware students are to be prepared for life in the 21st century. Four Delaware Curriculum Framework Commissions (English/language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies) participate in the standards development. Contains 7 references. (LB) |
| Entry Date: | 1993 |
| Accession Number: | ED355780 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED355780 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED355780 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Editorial & Opinion PubTypeId: editorialOpinion PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Raising Standards and Measuring Performance Equitably: Challenges for the National Education Goals Panel and State Assessment Systems. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Prince%2C+Cynthia+D%2E%22">Prince, Cynthia D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Forgione%2C+Pascal+D%2E%22">Forgione, Pascal D.</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 14 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1993 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Opinion Papers – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cultural+Pluralism%22">Cultural Pluralism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diversity+%28Student%29%22">Diversity (Student)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Assessment%22">Educational Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equal+Education%22">Equal Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Criteria%22">Evaluation Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minority+Groups%22">Minority Groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multicultural+Education%22">Multicultural Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22National+Standards%22">National Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+Formation%22">Policy Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Special+Needs+Students%22">Special Needs Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standard+Setting%22">Standard Setting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Standards%22">State Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Delaware%22">Delaware</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Approaches to equitable performance standards and assessment are discussed with three points of focus. First, the work of the National Education Goals Panel is described, with particular attention to Goal 3, Student Achievement and Citizenship, and the Panel's efforts to establish world-class standards of performance. National standards are assumed to include content standards, student performance standards, school delivery standards, and system performance standards. Second, four possible approaches to standard-setting for students with special needs are presented. They include the following: one standard for everybody; same standard, different conditions; different standards for different groups; and exclusion of some groups from assessment altogether. Potential advantages and disadvantages of each approach are discussed. Third, a discussion of how states are reacting to the national interest in standard-setting and assessments focuses on the standards-based approach to educational improvement adopted in Delaware. The New Directions for Education in Delaware reform plan adopted in May, 1992, clearly defines a strategy of educational standards and related assessments and accountability that will define the nature of educational change needed if Delaware students are to be prepared for life in the 21st century. Four Delaware Curriculum Framework Commissions (English/language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies) participate in the standards development. Contains 7 references. (LB) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1993 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED355780 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED355780 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Cultural Pluralism Type: general – SubjectFull: Diversity (Student) Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Change Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Equal Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: Minority Groups Type: general – SubjectFull: Multicultural Education Type: general – SubjectFull: National Standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Policy Formation Type: general – SubjectFull: Special Needs Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Standard Setting Type: general – SubjectFull: State Standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Delaware Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Raising Standards and Measuring Performance Equitably: Challenges for the National Education Goals Panel and State Assessment Systems. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Prince, Cynthia D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Forgione, Pascal D. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Type: published Y: 1993 |
| ResultId | 1 |