Direct Government Lending: The Bottom Line. A Critique of GAO's Report on Guaranteed Student Loans versus Direct Lending and Revised Savings Estimates.
Saved in:
| Title: | Direct Government Lending: The Bottom Line. A Critique of GAO's Report on Guaranteed Student Loans versus Direct Lending and Revised Savings Estimates. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Quick, Perry D., Ernst & Young, Washington, DC. |
| Availability: | Public Affairs Office, USA Group, Inc., P.O. Box 6180, Indianapolis, IN 46206-6180. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 10 |
| Publication Date: | 1993 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | USA Group, Inc., Indianapolis, IN. |
| Intended Audience: | Administrators; Policymakers; Practitioners |
| Document Type: | Reports - General |
| Descriptors: | Budgeting, Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Evaluation, Federal Aid, Financial Support, Higher Education, Paying for College, Postsecondary Education, Student Financial Aid, Student Loan Programs |
| Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: | Family Education Loan Program |
| Abstract: | This report addresses the dollar savings described in the Government Accounting Office's (GAO) report supporting direct lending as opposed to the present guaranteed student loan program. The critique explains the changes in the GAO model assumptions and projections that are believed necessary to move from the original $4.8 billion savings to a more reasonable figure. The new figure reflects: (1) 1992 amendments to the Higher Education Act; (2) the current interest rate and inflationary outlook; and (3) more reasonable assumptions about how the shift to direct lending will affect financial markets, educational institutions, student behavior, loan flows, and processing and servicing activities. The updated and revised estimates suggest that the shift from the current guaranteed student loan program to direct lending would generate essentially zero budgetary savings; in fact, it suggests that a $13 million loss, in present value terms, over the 5-year budget period could be experienced. (GLR) |
| Entry Date: | 1993 |
| Accession Number: | ED356726 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED356726 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED356726 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Direct Government Lending: The Bottom Line. A Critique of GAO's Report on Guaranteed Student Loans versus Direct Lending and Revised Savings Estimates. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Quick%2C+Perry+D%2E%22">Quick, Perry D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ernst+%26+Young%2C+Washington%2C+DC%2E%22">Ernst & Young, Washington, DC.</searchLink> – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Public Affairs Office, USA Group, Inc., P.O. Box 6180, Indianapolis, IN 46206-6180. – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 10 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1993 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: USA Group, Inc., Indianapolis, IN. – Name: Audience Label: Intended Audience Group: Audnce Data: Administrators; Policymakers; Practitioners – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - General – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Budgeting%22">Budgeting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cost+Effectiveness%22">Cost Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation%22">Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Aid%22">Federal Aid</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Financial+Support%22">Financial Support</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Paying+for+College%22">Paying for College</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Financial+Aid%22">Student Financial Aid</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Loan+Programs%22">Student Loan Programs</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Family+Education+Loan+Program%22">Family Education Loan Program</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This report addresses the dollar savings described in the Government Accounting Office's (GAO) report supporting direct lending as opposed to the present guaranteed student loan program. The critique explains the changes in the GAO model assumptions and projections that are believed necessary to move from the original $4.8 billion savings to a more reasonable figure. The new figure reflects: (1) 1992 amendments to the Higher Education Act; (2) the current interest rate and inflationary outlook; and (3) more reasonable assumptions about how the shift to direct lending will affect financial markets, educational institutions, student behavior, loan flows, and processing and servicing activities. The updated and revised estimates suggest that the shift from the current guaranteed student loan program to direct lending would generate essentially zero budgetary savings; in fact, it suggests that a $13 million loss, in present value terms, over the 5-year budget period could be experienced. (GLR) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1993 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED356726 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED356726 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 10 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Budgeting Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Cost Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Aid Type: general – SubjectFull: Financial Support Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Paying for College Type: general – SubjectFull: Postsecondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Financial Aid Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Loan Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Family Education Loan Program Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Direct Government Lending: The Bottom Line. A Critique of GAO's Report on Guaranteed Student Loans versus Direct Lending and Revised Savings Estimates. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ernst & Young, Washington, DC. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Quick, Perry D. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 1993 |
| ResultId | 1 |