The Effects of Violation of Data Set Assumptions when Using the Oneway, Fixed Effects Analysis of Variance and the One Concomitant Analysis of Covariance Statistical Procedures.
Saved in:
| Title: | The Effects of Violation of Data Set Assumptions when Using the Oneway, Fixed Effects Analysis of Variance and the One Concomitant Analysis of Covariance Statistical Procedures. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Johnson, Colleen Cook |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| Publication Date: | 1993 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative Speeches/Meeting Papers |
| Descriptors: | Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Monte Carlo Methods, Reliability, Research Design, Sample Size, Sampling, Statistical Distributions |
| Abstract: | The purpose of this study is to help define the precise nature and limits of the tolerable range in which a researcher may be relatively confident about the statistical validity of his or her research findings, focusing specifically on the statistical validity of results when violating the assumptions associated with the one-way, fixed-effects analysis of variance (ANOVA) and one concomitant analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) statistical procedure. Methodological and data set statistical assumptions that must be met for ANOVA and ANCOVA are discussed. Research results were obtained from an exploratory study of the effects of single and compound violations of the mathematical conditions (assumptions) underlying use of ANOVA and ANCOVA through Monte Carlo methods using randomly created data for a mathematical simulation (665 data set conditions). For all of the analyses, comparisons were made between the empirical F sampling distributions and the theoretical (i.e., nominal) F distributions expected when one uses normal theory. For balanced designs, the ANOVA and ANCOVA F tests were found to be remarkably robust when faced with most of the violations in the simulation. Research does reaffirm that ANOVA and ANCOVA should be avoided when group sizes are not equal. Specific recommendations are made for checking the ratio of largest to smallest group variances. (Contains 29 references.) (SLD) |
| Entry Date: | 1994 |
| Accession Number: | ED365720 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED365720 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED365720 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Effects of Violation of Data Set Assumptions when Using the Oneway, Fixed Effects Analysis of Variance and the One Concomitant Analysis of Covariance Statistical Procedures. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Johnson%2C+Colleen+Cook%22">Johnson, Colleen Cook</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 15 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1993 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Evaluative<br />Speeches/Meeting Papers – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Analysis+of+Covariance%22">Analysis of Covariance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Analysis+of+Variance%22">Analysis of Variance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Simulation%22">Computer Simulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Monte+Carlo+Methods%22">Monte Carlo Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reliability%22">Reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Design%22">Research Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sample+Size%22">Sample Size</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sampling%22">Sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Distributions%22">Statistical Distributions</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The purpose of this study is to help define the precise nature and limits of the tolerable range in which a researcher may be relatively confident about the statistical validity of his or her research findings, focusing specifically on the statistical validity of results when violating the assumptions associated with the one-way, fixed-effects analysis of variance (ANOVA) and one concomitant analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) statistical procedure. Methodological and data set statistical assumptions that must be met for ANOVA and ANCOVA are discussed. Research results were obtained from an exploratory study of the effects of single and compound violations of the mathematical conditions (assumptions) underlying use of ANOVA and ANCOVA through Monte Carlo methods using randomly created data for a mathematical simulation (665 data set conditions). For all of the analyses, comparisons were made between the empirical F sampling distributions and the theoretical (i.e., nominal) F distributions expected when one uses normal theory. For balanced designs, the ANOVA and ANCOVA F tests were found to be remarkably robust when faced with most of the violations in the simulation. Research does reaffirm that ANOVA and ANCOVA should be avoided when group sizes are not equal. Specific recommendations are made for checking the ratio of largest to smallest group variances. (Contains 29 references.) (SLD) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1994 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED365720 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED365720 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Analysis of Covariance Type: general – SubjectFull: Analysis of Variance Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Simulation Type: general – SubjectFull: Monte Carlo Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Design Type: general – SubjectFull: Sample Size Type: general – SubjectFull: Sampling Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Distributions Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Effects of Violation of Data Set Assumptions when Using the Oneway, Fixed Effects Analysis of Variance and the One Concomitant Analysis of Covariance Statistical Procedures. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Johnson, Colleen Cook IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 11 Type: published Y: 1993 |
| ResultId | 1 |