Assessing Editorials: An Instrument To Aid in the Task.
Saved in:
| Title: | Assessing Editorials: An Instrument To Aid in the Task. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Burkhalter, Nancy |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 20 |
| Publication Date: | 1993 |
| Document Type: | Speeches/Meeting Papers Guides - Classroom - Teacher Tests/Questionnaires |
| Descriptors: | Editorials, Grading, Higher Education, Holistic Evaluation, Journalism Education, Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation |
| Abstract: | Two kinds of instruments, atomistic versus holistic, offer different approaches to the grading of writing. This paper briefly discusses the pros and cons of these two philosophies of grading. In addition, the paper presents a holistic, primary-trait scoring instrument that has been used successfully to judge editorials by breaking down the analysis into three essential components: claims, data, and warrants. The paper concludes that using this primary-trait instrument aids journalism teachers not only in pinpointing weaknesses in editorials but also in designing remedial solutions for students. Criteria for judging quality of claims, data, and warrants; two student-written editorials, are attached. (Contains 15 references.) (Author/RS) |
| Entry Date: | 1994 |
| Accession Number: | ED366989 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED366989 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED366989 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Conference PubTypeId: conference PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Assessing Editorials: An Instrument To Aid in the Task. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burkhalter%2C+Nancy%22">Burkhalter, Nancy</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 20 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1993 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Speeches/Meeting Papers<br />Guides - Classroom - Teacher<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Editorials%22">Editorials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grading%22">Grading</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Holistic+Evaluation%22">Holistic Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Journalism+Education%22">Journalism Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Two kinds of instruments, atomistic versus holistic, offer different approaches to the grading of writing. This paper briefly discusses the pros and cons of these two philosophies of grading. In addition, the paper presents a holistic, primary-trait scoring instrument that has been used successfully to judge editorials by breaking down the analysis into three essential components: claims, data, and warrants. The paper concludes that using this primary-trait instrument aids journalism teachers not only in pinpointing weaknesses in editorials but also in designing remedial solutions for students. Criteria for judging quality of claims, data, and warrants; two student-written editorials, are attached. (Contains 15 references.) (Author/RS) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1994 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED366989 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED366989 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 20 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Editorials Type: general – SubjectFull: Grading Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Holistic Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Journalism Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Assessing Editorials: An Instrument To Aid in the Task. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burkhalter, Nancy IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 11 Type: published Y: 1993 |
| ResultId | 1 |