Learning To Teach Games for Understanding: Coming To Know the Action Research Process.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Learning To Teach Games for Understanding: Coming To Know the Action Research Process.
Language: English
Authors: Hopper, Tim F.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 34
Publication Date: 1996
Document Type: Reports - Descriptive
Descriptors: Action Research, After School Programs, Elementary Education, Field Experience Programs, Foreign Countries, Games, Higher Education, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Physical Education, Practicum Supervision, Preservice Teacher Education, Student Teacher Evaluation, Student Teacher Supervisors, Student Teachers, Teaching Experience, Teaching Methods
Geographic Terms: Canada
Abstract: This paper describes and interprets an action research project that supported student teachers learning to teach physical education in a community-based, after-school games program. Ten student teachers taught 10 lessons to elementary school children, under the guidance of 3 supervisory teachers, who were graduate students, and one program coordinator; student teachers and supervisors operated under a team teaching approach. A cultural circle of student teachers and their supervisors met once a week to discuss the lessons; minutes were taken from each meeting and assembled into a journal. Discussion ranged from student reliance on supervisors to lead the lesson to student thoughts on how the lessons should be supervised. Lessons focused on sports such as soccer, tennis, volleyball, and football, but were modified according to the pupils' abilities and based on thematic concerns, such as possession, change of direction, and consistency. The action research process consisted of plan, act and observe, reflect, then replan. Findings highlighted the difficulty between student teachers and supervisors as to who would/should lead the lesson. Group agreement determined that the student should have ownership of the lesson, while the supervisor was responsible for its quality. The action research process helped both students and supervisors move from a technical phase to a practical phase to an emancipatory phase where students became supervisors in their own lessons. The action research process permitted the new teaching knowledge of the students to be grounded within the community of discussants. (Contains 40 references.) (NAV)
Entry Date: 1996
Accession Number: ED393845
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED393845
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED393845
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Learning To Teach Games for Understanding: Coming To Know the Action Research Process.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hopper%2C+Tim+F%2E%22">Hopper, Tim F.</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 34
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1996
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Descriptive
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Action+Research%22">Action Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22After+School+Programs%22">After School Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Field+Experience+Programs%22">Field Experience Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Games%22">Games</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pedagogical+Content+Knowledge%22">Pedagogical Content Knowledge</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physical+Education%22">Physical Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Practicum+Supervision%22">Practicum Supervision</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preservice+Teacher+Education%22">Preservice Teacher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Teacher+Evaluation%22">Student Teacher Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Teacher+Supervisors%22">Student Teacher Supervisors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Teachers%22">Student Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Experience%22">Teaching Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Canada%22">Canada</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This paper describes and interprets an action research project that supported student teachers learning to teach physical education in a community-based, after-school games program. Ten student teachers taught 10 lessons to elementary school children, under the guidance of 3 supervisory teachers, who were graduate students, and one program coordinator; student teachers and supervisors operated under a team teaching approach. A cultural circle of student teachers and their supervisors met once a week to discuss the lessons; minutes were taken from each meeting and assembled into a journal. Discussion ranged from student reliance on supervisors to lead the lesson to student thoughts on how the lessons should be supervised. Lessons focused on sports such as soccer, tennis, volleyball, and football, but were modified according to the pupils' abilities and based on thematic concerns, such as possession, change of direction, and consistency. The action research process consisted of plan, act and observe, reflect, then replan. Findings highlighted the difficulty between student teachers and supervisors as to who would/should lead the lesson. Group agreement determined that the student should have ownership of the lesson, while the supervisor was responsible for its quality. The action research process helped both students and supervisors move from a technical phase to a practical phase to an emancipatory phase where students became supervisors in their own lessons. The action research process permitted the new teaching knowledge of the students to be grounded within the community of discussants. (Contains 40 references.) (NAV)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1996
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED393845
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED393845
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 34
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Action Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: After School Programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Elementary Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Field Experience Programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Games
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Higher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pedagogical Content Knowledge
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Physical Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Practicum Supervision
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Preservice Teacher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Teacher Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Teacher Supervisors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Experience
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Canada
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Learning To Teach Games for Understanding: Coming To Know the Action Research Process.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hopper, Tim F.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 1996
ResultId 1