Learning To Teach Games for Understanding: Coming To Know the Action Research Process.
Saved in:
| Title: | Learning To Teach Games for Understanding: Coming To Know the Action Research Process. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Hopper, Tim F. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 34 |
| Publication Date: | 1996 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Action Research, After School Programs, Elementary Education, Field Experience Programs, Foreign Countries, Games, Higher Education, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Physical Education, Practicum Supervision, Preservice Teacher Education, Student Teacher Evaluation, Student Teacher Supervisors, Student Teachers, Teaching Experience, Teaching Methods |
| Geographic Terms: | Canada |
| Abstract: | This paper describes and interprets an action research project that supported student teachers learning to teach physical education in a community-based, after-school games program. Ten student teachers taught 10 lessons to elementary school children, under the guidance of 3 supervisory teachers, who were graduate students, and one program coordinator; student teachers and supervisors operated under a team teaching approach. A cultural circle of student teachers and their supervisors met once a week to discuss the lessons; minutes were taken from each meeting and assembled into a journal. Discussion ranged from student reliance on supervisors to lead the lesson to student thoughts on how the lessons should be supervised. Lessons focused on sports such as soccer, tennis, volleyball, and football, but were modified according to the pupils' abilities and based on thematic concerns, such as possession, change of direction, and consistency. The action research process consisted of plan, act and observe, reflect, then replan. Findings highlighted the difficulty between student teachers and supervisors as to who would/should lead the lesson. Group agreement determined that the student should have ownership of the lesson, while the supervisor was responsible for its quality. The action research process helped both students and supervisors move from a technical phase to a practical phase to an emancipatory phase where students became supervisors in their own lessons. The action research process permitted the new teaching knowledge of the students to be grounded within the community of discussants. (Contains 40 references.) (NAV) |
| Entry Date: | 1996 |
| Accession Number: | ED393845 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED393845 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED393845 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Learning To Teach Games for Understanding: Coming To Know the Action Research Process. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hopper%2C+Tim+F%2E%22">Hopper, Tim F.</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 34 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1996 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Action+Research%22">Action Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22After+School+Programs%22">After School Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Field+Experience+Programs%22">Field Experience Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Games%22">Games</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pedagogical+Content+Knowledge%22">Pedagogical Content Knowledge</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physical+Education%22">Physical Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Practicum+Supervision%22">Practicum Supervision</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preservice+Teacher+Education%22">Preservice Teacher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Teacher+Evaluation%22">Student Teacher Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Teacher+Supervisors%22">Student Teacher Supervisors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Teachers%22">Student Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Experience%22">Teaching Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Canada%22">Canada</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This paper describes and interprets an action research project that supported student teachers learning to teach physical education in a community-based, after-school games program. Ten student teachers taught 10 lessons to elementary school children, under the guidance of 3 supervisory teachers, who were graduate students, and one program coordinator; student teachers and supervisors operated under a team teaching approach. A cultural circle of student teachers and their supervisors met once a week to discuss the lessons; minutes were taken from each meeting and assembled into a journal. Discussion ranged from student reliance on supervisors to lead the lesson to student thoughts on how the lessons should be supervised. Lessons focused on sports such as soccer, tennis, volleyball, and football, but were modified according to the pupils' abilities and based on thematic concerns, such as possession, change of direction, and consistency. The action research process consisted of plan, act and observe, reflect, then replan. Findings highlighted the difficulty between student teachers and supervisors as to who would/should lead the lesson. Group agreement determined that the student should have ownership of the lesson, while the supervisor was responsible for its quality. The action research process helped both students and supervisors move from a technical phase to a practical phase to an emancipatory phase where students became supervisors in their own lessons. The action research process permitted the new teaching knowledge of the students to be grounded within the community of discussants. (Contains 40 references.) (NAV) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1996 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED393845 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED393845 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 34 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Action Research Type: general – SubjectFull: After School Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Field Experience Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Games Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Pedagogical Content Knowledge Type: general – SubjectFull: Physical Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Practicum Supervision Type: general – SubjectFull: Preservice Teacher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Teacher Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Teacher Supervisors Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Experience Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Canada Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Learning To Teach Games for Understanding: Coming To Know the Action Research Process. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hopper, Tim F. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 1996 |
| ResultId | 1 |