Preserving Quality While Enhancing Productivity.
Saved in:
| Title: | Preserving Quality While Enhancing Productivity. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Burke, Joseph C., State Univ. of New York, Albany. Office of the Chancellor. |
| Source: | Studies in Public Higher Education. Jul 1993 (4). |
| Availability: | Office of the Chancellor, State University of New York, State University Plaza, Albany, NY 12246. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 44 |
| Publication Date: | 1993 |
| Document Type: | Collected Works - Serials Opinion Papers |
| Descriptors: | Accountability, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Publishing, Faculty Workload, Higher Education, Institutional Evaluation, Organizational Effectiveness, Productive Thinking, Productivity, Quality Control, Self Evaluation (Groups) |
| ISSN: | 1067-8662 |
| Abstract: | This report addresses the issue of "academic productivity," and the critical views of academia held by the public. The section titled "Quality Academics, Quality Productivity," posits that using new notions of productivity, with their emphasis on quality rather than quantity, will allow academia to increase its own productivity, with faculty as the key. To this end, the paper suggests that outdated quantitative approaches be discarded and calls for new performance models and better ways to measure quality. A nine-point quality agenda is proposed for the State University of New York (SUNY). In "Meeting the Productivity Challenge: System and Campus Performance Reports," the author says that the time has come for colleges and universities to present performance reports to the public, despite the challenge of reconciling autonomy and accountability within the university system. A need for flexibility, for system accountability, for setting performance indicators, and for setting systemwide macro indicators is seen as these dicta are applied to five generic "SUNY 2000" goals. Following the report, five tables detail the funding context and system and campus indicators that summarize "The Condition of SUNY." (CH) |
| Entry Date: | 1997 |
| Accession Number: | ED401789 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED401789 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED401789 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Periodical PubTypeId: serialPeriodical PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Preserving Quality While Enhancing Productivity. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burke%2C+Joseph+C%2E%22">Burke, Joseph C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22State+Univ%2E+of+New+York%2C+Albany%2E+Office+of+the+Chancellor%2E%22">State Univ. of New York, Albany. Office of the Chancellor.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Studies+in+Public+Higher+Education%22"><i>Studies in Public Higher Education</i></searchLink>. Jul 1993 (4). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Office of the Chancellor, State University of New York, State University Plaza, Albany, NY 12246. – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 44 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1993 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Collected Works - Serials<br />Opinion Papers – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Criteria%22">Evaluation Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Evaluation%22">Faculty Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Publishing%22">Faculty Publishing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Workload%22">Faculty Workload</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Institutional+Evaluation%22">Institutional Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+Effectiveness%22">Organizational Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Productive+Thinking%22">Productive Thinking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Productivity%22">Productivity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+Control%22">Quality Control</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Evaluation+%28Groups%29%22">Self Evaluation (Groups)</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1067-8662 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This report addresses the issue of "academic productivity," and the critical views of academia held by the public. The section titled "Quality Academics, Quality Productivity," posits that using new notions of productivity, with their emphasis on quality rather than quantity, will allow academia to increase its own productivity, with faculty as the key. To this end, the paper suggests that outdated quantitative approaches be discarded and calls for new performance models and better ways to measure quality. A nine-point quality agenda is proposed for the State University of New York (SUNY). In "Meeting the Productivity Challenge: System and Campus Performance Reports," the author says that the time has come for colleges and universities to present performance reports to the public, despite the challenge of reconciling autonomy and accountability within the university system. A need for flexibility, for system accountability, for setting performance indicators, and for setting systemwide macro indicators is seen as these dicta are applied to five generic "SUNY 2000" goals. Following the report, five tables detail the funding context and system and campus indicators that summarize "The Condition of SUNY." (CH) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1997 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED401789 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED401789 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 44 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Accountability Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Faculty Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Faculty Publishing Type: general – SubjectFull: Faculty Workload Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Institutional Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Organizational Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Productive Thinking Type: general – SubjectFull: Productivity Type: general – SubjectFull: Quality Control Type: general – SubjectFull: Self Evaluation (Groups) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Preserving Quality While Enhancing Productivity. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: State Univ. of New York, Albany. Office of the Chancellor. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burke, Joseph C. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Type: published Y: 1993 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1067-8662 Numbering: – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Studies in Public Higher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |