Comparability of Scores on Word-Processed and Handwritten Essays on the Graduate Management Admissions Test.
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparability of Scores on Word-Processed and Handwritten Essays on the Graduate Management Admissions Test. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Bridgeman, Brent, Cooper, Peter |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 9 |
| Publication Date: | 1998 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research Speeches/Meeting Papers |
| Descriptors: | College Entrance Examinations, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Essay Tests, Graduate Students, Handwriting, Higher Education, Interrater Reliability, Scores, Testing Problems, Word Processing, Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation, Writing Skills |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Graduate Management Admission Test |
| Abstract: | Essays for the Graduate Management Admissions Test must be written with a word processor (except in some foreign countries). The test sponsors, the Graduate Management Admissions Council, believed that this is fair because some word processing skill is a prerequisite for advanced management education. Furthermore, it might also be unfair to require students who routinely use word processors to shift to paper and pencil just for a testing situation. The current study addressed the comparability of scores from handwritten and word-processed essays using a sample of 3,470 examinees who had written essays in both formats. Both the computer and paper-and-pencil versions contained two 30-minute essays questions, one asking for an analysis of an issue and the other analyzing the reasoning of a presented argument. Results indicate that scores were higher on the handwritten essays than on the word-processed essays, and that this difference did not interact with gender, ethnic, or English-as-a-Second-Language group classifications. Differences between scores for handwritten and word-processed essays were smallest for the most experienced computer users, but even examinees who reported using a word processor more than two times a week had higher scores on their handwritten essays than on their word-processed essays. Other findings indicated that reader reliability was higher for the word-processed essays, and that in either format there were substantial practice effects, with the scores on the second essay about 0.4 standard deviation units higher than scores on the first essay. (Author/SLD) |
| Entry Date: | 1998 |
| Accession Number: | ED421528 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED421528 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED421528 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Comparability of Scores on Word-Processed and Handwritten Essays on the Graduate Management Admissions Test. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bridgeman%2C+Brent%22">Bridgeman, Brent</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cooper%2C+Peter%22">Cooper, Peter</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 9 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1998 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research<br />Speeches/Meeting Papers – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Entrance+Examinations%22">College Entrance Examinations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Essay+Tests%22">Essay Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+Students%22">Graduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Handwriting%22">Handwriting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interrater+Reliability%22">Interrater Reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Testing+Problems%22">Testing Problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Word+Processing%22">Word Processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+%28Composition%29%22">Writing (Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Skills%22">Writing Skills</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Graduate+Management+Admission+Test%22">Graduate Management Admission Test</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Essays for the Graduate Management Admissions Test must be written with a word processor (except in some foreign countries). The test sponsors, the Graduate Management Admissions Council, believed that this is fair because some word processing skill is a prerequisite for advanced management education. Furthermore, it might also be unfair to require students who routinely use word processors to shift to paper and pencil just for a testing situation. The current study addressed the comparability of scores from handwritten and word-processed essays using a sample of 3,470 examinees who had written essays in both formats. Both the computer and paper-and-pencil versions contained two 30-minute essays questions, one asking for an analysis of an issue and the other analyzing the reasoning of a presented argument. Results indicate that scores were higher on the handwritten essays than on the word-processed essays, and that this difference did not interact with gender, ethnic, or English-as-a-Second-Language group classifications. Differences between scores for handwritten and word-processed essays were smallest for the most experienced computer users, but even examinees who reported using a word processor more than two times a week had higher scores on their handwritten essays than on their word-processed essays. Other findings indicated that reader reliability was higher for the word-processed essays, and that in either format there were substantial practice effects, with the scores on the second essay about 0.4 standard deviation units higher than scores on the first essay. (Author/SLD) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 1998 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED421528 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED421528 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 9 Subjects: – SubjectFull: College Entrance Examinations Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Essay Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Handwriting Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Interrater Reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Scores Type: general – SubjectFull: Testing Problems Type: general – SubjectFull: Word Processing Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing (Composition) Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduate Management Admission Test Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Comparability of Scores on Word-Processed and Handwritten Essays on the Graduate Management Admissions Test. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bridgeman, Brent – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cooper, Peter IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 1998 |
| ResultId | 1 |