Performance Funding and Budgeting: Popularity and Volatility--The Third Annual Survey.
Saved in:
| Title: | Performance Funding and Budgeting: Popularity and Volatility--The Third Annual Survey. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Burke, Joseph C., Modarresi, Shahpar, State Univ. of New York, Albany. Nelson A. Rockefeller Inst. of Government. |
| Availability: | Public Higher Education Program, The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, 411 State Street, Albany, NY 12203-1003; Tel: 518-443-5835; Fax: 518-443-5845; e-mail: burkejo@rockinst.org; Web site: http://rockinst.org/higheduc.htm ($10). |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 26 |
| Publication Date: | 1999 |
| Document Type: | Numerical/Quantitative Data Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Descriptors: | Accountability, Budgeting, College Outcomes Assessment, Educational Finance, Government School Relationship, Higher Education, National Surveys, Performance Factors, Public Colleges, Resource Allocation, State Aid, Tables (Data) |
| Abstract: | This report presents findings of the third annual survey of state programs that link funding to campus performance, either in the form of performance budgeting or performance funding. The survey found that 30 states now have at least one of these two types of programs, up from 26 states the previous year, although some earlier programs have been abandoned. Nine states have both performance budgeting and performance funding, an increase of one. Sixteen states have performance funding, an increase of three; the net result of six new initiatives and three dropped programs. Additionally, 23 states (up from 21) have performance budgeting, the total representing six new initiatives and four dropped programs. The mixed findings suggest that performance budgeting or funding will not replace traditional budgeting for public colleges and universities, although there is a growing belief in state capitols that performance should be related to allocation of resources to public education. Following the introduction and a description of the survey program, individual sections analyze findings on performance budgeting and performance funding, performance budgeting, performance funding, and performance reporting. These sections are followed by a discussion of future trends and a brief conclusion. The survey is appended. (DB) |
| Entry Date: | 2000 |
| Accession Number: | ED432933 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED432933 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED432933 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Electronic Resource PubTypeId: electronicResource PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Performance Funding and Budgeting: Popularity and Volatility--The Third Annual Survey. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burke%2C+Joseph+C%2E%22">Burke, Joseph C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Modarresi%2C+Shahpar%22">Modarresi, Shahpar</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22State+Univ%2E+of+New+York%2C+Albany%2E+Nelson+A%2E+Rockefeller+Inst%2E+of+Government%2E%22">State Univ. of New York, Albany. Nelson A. Rockefeller Inst. of Government.</searchLink> – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Public Higher Education Program, The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, 411 State Street, Albany, NY 12203-1003; Tel: 518-443-5835; Fax: 518-443-5845; e-mail: burkejo@rockinst.org; Web site: http://rockinst.org/higheduc.htm ($10). – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 26 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1999 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Numerical/Quantitative Data<br />Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Budgeting%22">Budgeting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Outcomes+Assessment%22">College Outcomes Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Finance%22">Educational Finance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+School+Relationship%22">Government School Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22National+Surveys%22">National Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Performance+Factors%22">Performance Factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Colleges%22">Public Colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Resource+Allocation%22">Resource Allocation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Aid%22">State Aid</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tables+%28Data%29%22">Tables (Data)</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This report presents findings of the third annual survey of state programs that link funding to campus performance, either in the form of performance budgeting or performance funding. The survey found that 30 states now have at least one of these two types of programs, up from 26 states the previous year, although some earlier programs have been abandoned. Nine states have both performance budgeting and performance funding, an increase of one. Sixteen states have performance funding, an increase of three; the net result of six new initiatives and three dropped programs. Additionally, 23 states (up from 21) have performance budgeting, the total representing six new initiatives and four dropped programs. The mixed findings suggest that performance budgeting or funding will not replace traditional budgeting for public colleges and universities, although there is a growing belief in state capitols that performance should be related to allocation of resources to public education. Following the introduction and a description of the survey program, individual sections analyze findings on performance budgeting and performance funding, performance budgeting, performance funding, and performance reporting. These sections are followed by a discussion of future trends and a brief conclusion. The survey is appended. (DB) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2000 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED432933 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED432933 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 26 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Accountability Type: general – SubjectFull: Budgeting Type: general – SubjectFull: College Outcomes Assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Finance Type: general – SubjectFull: Government School Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: National Surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: Performance Factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Colleges Type: general – SubjectFull: Resource Allocation Type: general – SubjectFull: State Aid Type: general – SubjectFull: Tables (Data) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Performance Funding and Budgeting: Popularity and Volatility--The Third Annual Survey. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: State Univ. of New York, Albany. Nelson A. Rockefeller Inst. of Government. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burke, Joseph C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Modarresi, Shahpar IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 1999 |
| ResultId | 1 |