Caption Speed and Viewer Comprehension of Television Programs. Final Report.
Saved in:
| Title: | Caption Speed and Viewer Comprehension of Television Programs. Final Report. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Jensema, Carl J., Burch, Robb, Institute for Disability Research and Training, Inc., Silver Spring, MD. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 132 |
| Publication Date: | 1999 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Special Education Programs (ED/OSERS), Washington, DC. |
| Contract Number: | H180G60013 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Descriptors: | Adults, Age Differences, Captions, Children, Deafness, Hearing Impairments, Performance Factors, Reading Rate, Sex Differences, Television, Test Items, Tests, Time |
| Geographic Terms: | U.S.; Maryland |
| Abstract: | This final report discusses the outcomes of the third in a series of studies related to the speed with which captions appear on television programs. Video segments captioned at different speeds were shown to 1,102 subjects (aged 11-95) with and without hearing impairments, and the subjects then responded to test items based on the captions in the videos. The caption speeds ranged from 80 words-per-minute (wpm) to 220 wpm. One set of test items was based directly on facts given in the captions. Another set of items was based on inferences that could be made from caption information. Overall, there was no significant relationship between test scores and caption speed. Test scores were compared over various demographic categories. The study did not find a meaningful relationship between age and mean test scores. The mean test scores of females equaled or exceeded the mean test scores of males at all caption speed levels. Subjects who were junior high school students remembered facts as well as the other subjects did, but seemed less able to draw conclusions based on such facts. Overall, nonstudents tended to have slightly higher mean scores than students. (Contains 22 tables; appendices contain videoscripts, a demographic questionnaire, fact tests, narrative tests, and item response distributions). (CR) |
| Journal Code: | RIEMAR2000 |
| Entry Date: | 2000 |
| Accession Number: | ED434446 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED434446 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED434446 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Caption Speed and Viewer Comprehension of Television Programs. Final Report. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jensema%2C+Carl+J%2E%22">Jensema, Carl J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burch%2C+Robb%22">Burch, Robb</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Institute+for+Disability+Research+and+Training%2C+Inc%2E%2C+Silver+Spring%2C+MD%2E%22">Institute for Disability Research and Training, Inc., Silver Spring, MD.</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 132 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1999 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Special Education Programs (ED/OSERS), Washington, DC. – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: H180G60013 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adults%22">Adults</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Age+Differences%22">Age Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Captions%22">Captions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Children%22">Children</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Deafness%22">Deafness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hearing+Impairments%22">Hearing Impairments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Performance+Factors%22">Performance Factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Rate%22">Reading Rate</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+Differences%22">Sex Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Television%22">Television</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Items%22">Test Items</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tests%22">Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time%22">Time</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22U%2ES%2E%3B+Maryland%22">U.S.; Maryland</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This final report discusses the outcomes of the third in a series of studies related to the speed with which captions appear on television programs. Video segments captioned at different speeds were shown to 1,102 subjects (aged 11-95) with and without hearing impairments, and the subjects then responded to test items based on the captions in the videos. The caption speeds ranged from 80 words-per-minute (wpm) to 220 wpm. One set of test items was based directly on facts given in the captions. Another set of items was based on inferences that could be made from caption information. Overall, there was no significant relationship between test scores and caption speed. Test scores were compared over various demographic categories. The study did not find a meaningful relationship between age and mean test scores. The mean test scores of females equaled or exceeded the mean test scores of males at all caption speed levels. Subjects who were junior high school students remembered facts as well as the other subjects did, but seemed less able to draw conclusions based on such facts. Overall, nonstudents tended to have slightly higher mean scores than students. (Contains 22 tables; appendices contain videoscripts, a demographic questionnaire, fact tests, narrative tests, and item response distributions). (CR) – Name: CodeSource Label: Journal Code Group: SrcInfo Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JC" term="%22RIEMAR2000%22">RIEMAR2000</searchLink> – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2000 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED434446 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED434446 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 132 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Adults Type: general – SubjectFull: Age Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Captions Type: general – SubjectFull: Children Type: general – SubjectFull: Deafness Type: general – SubjectFull: Hearing Impairments Type: general – SubjectFull: Performance Factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Rate Type: general – SubjectFull: Sex Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Television Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Items Type: general – SubjectFull: Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Time Type: general – SubjectFull: U.S.; Maryland Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Caption Speed and Viewer Comprehension of Television Programs. Final Report. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Institute for Disability Research and Training, Inc., Silver Spring, MD. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jensema, Carl J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burch, Robb IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 31 M: 08 Type: published Y: 1999 |
| ResultId | 1 |