Reliability and Validity of SERVQUAL Scores Used To Evaluate Perceptions of Library Service Quality.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Reliability and Validity of SERVQUAL Scores Used To Evaluate Perceptions of Library Service Quality.
Language: English
Authors: Thompson, Bruce, Cook, Colleen
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 37
Publication Date: 2000
Document Type: Reports - Research
Speeches/Meeting Papers
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Library Services, Measurement Techniques, Reliability, Scores, Surveys, Users (Information), Validity
Abstract: Research libraries are increasingly supplementing collection counts with perceptions of service quality as indices of status and productivity. The present study was undertaken to explore the reliability and validity of scores from the SERVQUAL measurement protocol (A. Parasuraman and others, 1991), which has previously been used in this type of application in libraries. The study involved collection of perceptions from 697 participants representing 4 different user groups and 3 different biannual surveys. Scores were highly reliable, but the five SERVQUAL dimensions suggested by SERVQUAL scoring keys were not recovered. Furthermore, different dimensions were recovered under three different frames of reference. (Contains 9 tables and 28 references.) (Author/SLD)
Entry Date: 2000
Accession Number: ED435671
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED435671
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED435671
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Reliability and Validity of SERVQUAL Scores Used To Evaluate Perceptions of Library Service Quality.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thompson%2C+Bruce%22">Thompson, Bruce</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cook%2C+Colleen%22">Cook, Colleen</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 37
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2000
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research<br />Speeches/Meeting Papers
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Library+Services%22">Library Services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measurement+Techniques%22">Measurement Techniques</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reliability%22">Reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Users+%28Information%29%22">Users (Information)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Validity%22">Validity</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Research libraries are increasingly supplementing collection counts with perceptions of service quality as indices of status and productivity. The present study was undertaken to explore the reliability and validity of scores from the SERVQUAL measurement protocol (A. Parasuraman and others, 1991), which has previously been used in this type of application in libraries. The study involved collection of perceptions from 697 participants representing 4 different user groups and 3 different biannual surveys. Scores were highly reliable, but the five SERVQUAL dimensions suggested by SERVQUAL scoring keys were not recovered. Furthermore, different dimensions were recovered under three different frames of reference. (Contains 9 tables and 28 references.) (Author/SLD)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2000
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED435671
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED435671
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 37
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Higher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Library Services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Measurement Techniques
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reliability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scores
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Users (Information)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Validity
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Reliability and Validity of SERVQUAL Scores Used To Evaluate Perceptions of Library Service Quality.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Thompson, Bruce
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cook, Colleen
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2000
ResultId 1