Performance Funding and Budgeting: An Emerging Merger? The Fourth Annual Survey (2000).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Performance Funding and Budgeting: An Emerging Merger? The Fourth Annual Survey (2000).
Language: English
Authors: Burke, Joseph C., Rosen, Jeff, Minassians, Henrik, Lessard, Terri, State Univ. of New York, Albany. Nelson A. Rockefeller Inst. of Government.
Availability: Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York, 411 State Street, Albany, NY 12203-1003. Tel: 518-443-5835; Fax: 518-443-5845; Web site: http://www.rockinst.org/higheduc.htm.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 28
Publication Date: 2000
Document Type: Reports - Research
Tests/Questionnaires
Descriptors: Educational Finance, Higher Education, Public Colleges, Questionnaires, School Effectiveness, State Government, State Legislation
Abstract: This report presents the results of the fourth annual survey of programs linking state budgeting to public college and university performance. A telephone survey conducted with all 50 state higher education finance officers examined the status, prospects, and impact of performance funding and performance budgeting in their state. Respondents were asked: whether legislation mandated performance funding, performance budgeting, and performance reporting, and prescribed the performance indicators; to identify primary initiators of the programs; and to assess effects of performance budgeting, performance funding, and performance reporting on improving campus performance. Results highlight the increasing popularity and continuing volatility of performance funding and performance budgeting, with 37 states now having at least one of the two programs. This year's survey notes a rapid growth in performance budgeting and slight increase in performance funding. Performance funding is becoming more flexible, collaborative, and diverse, while performance budgeting offers ways to clarify the link between funding and performance. A new development is a mixed model that borrows elements from both programs. While nearly half of the respondents said it was too early to evaluate the effect of performance funding on institutional improvement, 35 percent claimed the program improved performance to a significant extent. The survey is appended. (SM)
Entry Date: 2001
Accession Number: ED445626
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED445626
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED445626
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Performance Funding and Budgeting: An Emerging Merger? The Fourth Annual Survey (2000).
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burke%2C+Joseph+C%2E%22">Burke, Joseph C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rosen%2C+Jeff%22">Rosen, Jeff</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Minassians%2C+Henrik%22">Minassians, Henrik</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lessard%2C+Terri%22">Lessard, Terri</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22State+Univ%2E+of+New+York%2C+Albany%2E+Nelson+A%2E+Rockefeller+Inst%2E+of+Government%2E%22">State Univ. of New York, Albany. Nelson A. Rockefeller Inst. of Government.</searchLink>
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York, 411 State Street, Albany, NY 12203-1003. Tel: 518-443-5835; Fax: 518-443-5845; Web site: http://www.rockinst.org/higheduc.htm.
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 28
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2000
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Finance%22">Educational Finance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Colleges%22">Public Colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Effectiveness%22">School Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Government%22">State Government</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Legislation%22">State Legislation</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This report presents the results of the fourth annual survey of programs linking state budgeting to public college and university performance. A telephone survey conducted with all 50 state higher education finance officers examined the status, prospects, and impact of performance funding and performance budgeting in their state. Respondents were asked: whether legislation mandated performance funding, performance budgeting, and performance reporting, and prescribed the performance indicators; to identify primary initiators of the programs; and to assess effects of performance budgeting, performance funding, and performance reporting on improving campus performance. Results highlight the increasing popularity and continuing volatility of performance funding and performance budgeting, with 37 states now having at least one of the two programs. This year's survey notes a rapid growth in performance budgeting and slight increase in performance funding. Performance funding is becoming more flexible, collaborative, and diverse, while performance budgeting offers ways to clarify the link between funding and performance. A new development is a mixed model that borrows elements from both programs. While nearly half of the respondents said it was too early to evaluate the effect of performance funding on institutional improvement, 35 percent claimed the program improved performance to a significant extent. The survey is appended. (SM)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2001
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED445626
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED445626
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 28
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Educational Finance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Higher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public Colleges
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Questionnaires
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State Government
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State Legislation
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Performance Funding and Budgeting: An Emerging Merger? The Fourth Annual Survey (2000).
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: State Univ. of New York, Albany. Nelson A. Rockefeller Inst. of Government.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Burke, Joseph C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rosen, Jeff
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Minassians, Henrik
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lessard, Terri
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2000
ResultId 1