A Just Transition? Lessons from Defense Worker Adjustment in the 1990s. Technical Paper No. 237.
Saved in:
| Title: | A Just Transition? Lessons from Defense Worker Adjustment in the 1990s. Technical Paper No. 237. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Powers, Laura, Markusen, Ann, Economic Policy Inst., Washington, DC. |
| Availability: | Economic Policy Institute, 1660 L Street NW, Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20036 ($10). Tel: 800-374-4844 (Toll Free); Tel: 202-775-8810; Fax: 202-775-0819; e-mail: publications@epinet.org; Web site: http://www.epinet.org. For full text: http://www.epinet.org/technicalpapers/justtransition.PDF. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 90 |
| Publication Date: | 1999 |
| Intended Audience: | Policymakers |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Adults, Dislocated Workers, Economic Impact, Employment Patterns, Employment Problems, Employment Programs, Federal Programs, Government Role, Industrial Training, Job Layoff, Job Training, Labor Economics, Labor Force Development, Labor Market, Labor Utilization, Manufacturing, Program Effectiveness, Public Policy, Retraining, Structural Unemployment, Vocational Adjustment |
| Abstract: | A study examined the experiences of some 1.4 million American defense industry workers, displaced in the wake of the Cold War, as a way of reviewing and evaluating national policies toward worker adjustment and re-employment as they have evolved in the 1990s. The study found that the federal government, through the Department of Labor, acknowledged responsibility for the unemployment resulting from the end of the Cold War and that new types of programs were needed for these displaced workers. However, results of the initiatives spawned by these policies were mixed. Key conclusions of the study include the following: (1) the federal government endorsed a radically "marketized" approach (supporting mergers, encouraging firms to seek foreign military markets rather than to diversify at home, and favoring short-term technological fixes) to labor resulting in workers bearing the brunt of the costs of post-Cold War downsizing as their employers continued to earn high profits; (2) programs geared toward re-employing displaced workers meet their goals when they dedicate brainpower and financial resources to matching and adapting existing employee skills to identifiable opportunities in local labor markets; (3) transition programs directed at businesses retain jobs when they encourage training-intensive (as opposed to technology-intensive) strategies; and (4) if they are to create jobs, federal investments in emerging technologies require not only the "push" of initial research and development expenditures, but also the large-scale market creation induced by government procurement policies. (Contains 119 references, 16 tables, 3 boxes, and 3 figures.) (KC) |
| Entry Date: | 2002 |
| Accession Number: | ED457337 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED457337 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED457337 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Just Transition? Lessons from Defense Worker Adjustment in the 1990s. Technical Paper No. 237. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Powers%2C+Laura%22">Powers, Laura</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Markusen%2C+Ann%22">Markusen, Ann</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Economic+Policy+Inst%2E%2C+Washington%2C+DC%2E%22">Economic Policy Inst., Washington, DC.</searchLink> – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Economic Policy Institute, 1660 L Street NW, Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20036 ($10). Tel: 800-374-4844 (Toll Free); Tel: 202-775-8810; Fax: 202-775-0819; e-mail: publications@epinet.org; Web site: http://www.epinet.org. For full text: http://www.epinet.org/technicalpapers/justtransition.PDF. – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 90 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 1999 – Name: Audience Label: Intended Audience Group: Audnce Data: Policymakers – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Evaluative – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adults%22">Adults</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dislocated+Workers%22">Dislocated Workers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Economic+Impact%22">Economic Impact</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employment+Patterns%22">Employment Patterns</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employment+Problems%22">Employment Problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employment+Programs%22">Employment Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Programs%22">Federal Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+Role%22">Government Role</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Industrial+Training%22">Industrial Training</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Job+Layoff%22">Job Layoff</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Job+Training%22">Job Training</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Labor+Economics%22">Labor Economics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Labor+Force+Development%22">Labor Force Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Labor+Market%22">Labor Market</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Labor+Utilization%22">Labor Utilization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Manufacturing%22">Manufacturing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Policy%22">Public Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Retraining%22">Retraining</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Structural+Unemployment%22">Structural Unemployment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocational+Adjustment%22">Vocational Adjustment</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: A study examined the experiences of some 1.4 million American defense industry workers, displaced in the wake of the Cold War, as a way of reviewing and evaluating national policies toward worker adjustment and re-employment as they have evolved in the 1990s. The study found that the federal government, through the Department of Labor, acknowledged responsibility for the unemployment resulting from the end of the Cold War and that new types of programs were needed for these displaced workers. However, results of the initiatives spawned by these policies were mixed. Key conclusions of the study include the following: (1) the federal government endorsed a radically "marketized" approach (supporting mergers, encouraging firms to seek foreign military markets rather than to diversify at home, and favoring short-term technological fixes) to labor resulting in workers bearing the brunt of the costs of post-Cold War downsizing as their employers continued to earn high profits; (2) programs geared toward re-employing displaced workers meet their goals when they dedicate brainpower and financial resources to matching and adapting existing employee skills to identifiable opportunities in local labor markets; (3) transition programs directed at businesses retain jobs when they encourage training-intensive (as opposed to technology-intensive) strategies; and (4) if they are to create jobs, federal investments in emerging technologies require not only the "push" of initial research and development expenditures, but also the large-scale market creation induced by government procurement policies. (Contains 119 references, 16 tables, 3 boxes, and 3 figures.) (KC) – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2002 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED457337 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED457337 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 90 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Adults Type: general – SubjectFull: Dislocated Workers Type: general – SubjectFull: Economic Impact Type: general – SubjectFull: Employment Patterns Type: general – SubjectFull: Employment Problems Type: general – SubjectFull: Employment Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Government Role Type: general – SubjectFull: Industrial Training Type: general – SubjectFull: Job Layoff Type: general – SubjectFull: Job Training Type: general – SubjectFull: Labor Economics Type: general – SubjectFull: Labor Force Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Labor Market Type: general – SubjectFull: Labor Utilization Type: general – SubjectFull: Manufacturing Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Retraining Type: general – SubjectFull: Structural Unemployment Type: general – SubjectFull: Vocational Adjustment Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Just Transition? Lessons from Defense Worker Adjustment in the 1990s. Technical Paper No. 237. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Economic Policy Inst., Washington, DC. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Powers, Laura – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Markusen, Ann IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 1999 |
| ResultId | 1 |