My Place or Yours: Theorizing Eclectic Writing Centers.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: My Place or Yours: Theorizing Eclectic Writing Centers.
Language: English
Authors: Rossini, Carol
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 13
Publication Date: 2002
Document Type: Opinion Papers
Speeches/Meeting Papers
Descriptors: Case Studies, Educational Practices, Higher Education, Process Approach (Writing), Writing Laboratories
Abstract: None of the theories that inform writing center work--Freudian theory, cognitivism, feminism, postmodernism, current-traditionalism, expressivism, social constructionism, and family systems theory--offer an adequate basis for writing center work. Even when Stephen North proposed "The Idea of a Writing Center" in 1984 (still considered to be the theoretical foundation of writing centers), he later retracted much of it as being impractical. For the past 30 years writing centers have considered themselves to be eclectic, so defined that research performed in one center is irrelevant to other writing centers. This paper discusses how borrowing two composition theories affected both Stephen North's writing center and the author's, and how emphasizing eclecticism has led to this reliance on borrowing rather than formulating theory. The two theories borrowed from composition are product and process--Eric Hobson considers these to be "trite descriptions," but the paper considers them apt descriptions of writing center work. The paper discusses the clash between product and process and outlines a specific clash and its outcome at Regis University's Writing Center, founded in 1989. It states that while the basis for real theory exists in writing centers' practices, it has no forum for discussion. The paper contends that until writing centers develop genuine writing center theory based on practice, they are all subject to being dismissed as fluff--nice to have in good times but unnecessary when budget cuts loom. (Contains 3 tables and 23 notes.) (NKA)
Entry Date: 2003
Accession Number: ED470708
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED470708
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED470708
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Editorial & Opinion
PubTypeId: editorialOpinion
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: My Place or Yours: Theorizing Eclectic Writing Centers.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rossini%2C+Carol%22">Rossini, Carol</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 13
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2002
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Opinion Papers<br />Speeches/Meeting Papers
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Case+Studies%22">Case Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Practices%22">Educational Practices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Process+Approach+%28Writing%29%22">Process Approach (Writing)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Laboratories%22">Writing Laboratories</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: None of the theories that inform writing center work--Freudian theory, cognitivism, feminism, postmodernism, current-traditionalism, expressivism, social constructionism, and family systems theory--offer an adequate basis for writing center work. Even when Stephen North proposed "The Idea of a Writing Center" in 1984 (still considered to be the theoretical foundation of writing centers), he later retracted much of it as being impractical. For the past 30 years writing centers have considered themselves to be eclectic, so defined that research performed in one center is irrelevant to other writing centers. This paper discusses how borrowing two composition theories affected both Stephen North's writing center and the author's, and how emphasizing eclecticism has led to this reliance on borrowing rather than formulating theory. The two theories borrowed from composition are product and process--Eric Hobson considers these to be "trite descriptions," but the paper considers them apt descriptions of writing center work. The paper discusses the clash between product and process and outlines a specific clash and its outcome at Regis University's Writing Center, founded in 1989. It states that while the basis for real theory exists in writing centers' practices, it has no forum for discussion. The paper contends that until writing centers develop genuine writing center theory based on practice, they are all subject to being dismissed as fluff--nice to have in good times but unnecessary when budget cuts loom. (Contains 3 tables and 23 notes.) (NKA)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2003
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED470708
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED470708
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 13
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Case Studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Practices
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Higher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Process Approach (Writing)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Laboratories
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: My Place or Yours: Theorizing Eclectic Writing Centers.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rossini, Carol
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 21
              M: 03
              Type: published
              Y: 2002
ResultId 1