The Impact of Conditional Scores on the Performance of DETECT.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Impact of Conditional Scores on the Performance of DETECT.
Language: English
Authors: Zhang, Yanwei Oliver, Yu, Feng, Nandakumar, Ratna
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 52
Publication Date: 2003
Document Type: Reports - Research
Speeches/Meeting Papers
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Nonparametric Statistics, Scores, Simulation
Abstract: DETECT is a nonparametric, conditional covariance-based procedure to identify dimensional structure and the degree of multidimensionality of test data. The ability composite or conditional score used to estimate conditional covariance plays a significant role in the performance of DETECT. The number correct score of all items in the test (T) and the number correct score of remaining items (S), other than the two items in consideration, are two natural candidates for computing conditional covariances. However, these conditional scores produce biased estimates in finite samples. Some type of correction is required in computing the estimates of conditional covariances. This study investigated the effect of centering and/or averaging T and S as bias correction methods. This process resulted in six different estimates of conditional covariances for use in the DETECT procedure, and 72 types of test data were simulated to vary in sample size, test length, degree of multidimensionality, and distribution of items into clusters. The impact of the six estimates on the performance of DETECT were studied for three aspects: Dmax value, r ratio, and the percentage of items correctly classified into clusters. The results show that the centered conditional score S performed best. The next best index was the average of T and S with centering, followed by the average of T and S without centering. (Contains 8 tables, 11 figures, and 11 references.) (Author/SLD)
Entry Date: 2004
Accession Number: ED478170
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED478170
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED478170
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Impact of Conditional Scores on the Performance of DETECT.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhang%2C+Yanwei+Oliver%22">Zhang, Yanwei Oliver</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yu%2C+Feng%22">Yu, Feng</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nandakumar%2C+Ratna%22">Nandakumar, Ratna</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 52
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2003
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research<br />Speeches/Meeting Papers
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Estimation+%28Mathematics%29%22">Estimation (Mathematics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nonparametric+Statistics%22">Nonparametric Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Simulation%22">Simulation</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: DETECT is a nonparametric, conditional covariance-based procedure to identify dimensional structure and the degree of multidimensionality of test data. The ability composite or conditional score used to estimate conditional covariance plays a significant role in the performance of DETECT. The number correct score of all items in the test (T) and the number correct score of remaining items (S), other than the two items in consideration, are two natural candidates for computing conditional covariances. However, these conditional scores produce biased estimates in finite samples. Some type of correction is required in computing the estimates of conditional covariances. This study investigated the effect of centering and/or averaging T and S as bias correction methods. This process resulted in six different estimates of conditional covariances for use in the DETECT procedure, and 72 types of test data were simulated to vary in sample size, test length, degree of multidimensionality, and distribution of items into clusters. The impact of the six estimates on the performance of DETECT were studied for three aspects: Dmax value, r ratio, and the percentage of items correctly classified into clusters. The results show that the centered conditional score S performed best. The next best index was the average of T and S with centering, followed by the average of T and S without centering. (Contains 8 tables, 11 figures, and 11 references.) (Author/SLD)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2004
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED478170
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED478170
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 52
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Estimation (Mathematics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nonparametric Statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scores
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Simulation
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Impact of Conditional Scores on the Performance of DETECT.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zhang, Yanwei Oliver
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yu, Feng
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nandakumar, Ratna
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Type: published
              Y: 2003
ResultId 1