Measure of School Capacity for Improvement (MSCI): Early Field Test Findings
Saved in:
| Title: | Measure of School Capacity for Improvement (MSCI): Early Field Test Findings |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Riffle, M. J. S., Howley, C. W., Ermolov, L. D., Appalachia Educational Lab., Charleston, WV. |
| Source: | AEL. 2004. |
| Availability: | AEL, Post Office Box 1348, Charleston, WV 25325-1348. Tel: 800-624-9120 (Toll Free); Fax: 304-347-0487; e-mail: aelinfo@ael.org; Web site: http://www.ael.org. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 36 |
| Publication Date: | 2004 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education High Schools Middle Schools |
| Descriptors: | Test Reliability, Test Validity, Construct Validity, Access to Computers, Educational Improvement, Academic Achievement, Educational Quality, Teacher Effectiveness, Equal Education, Teacher Expectations of Students |
| Abstract: | This study was conducted to confirm the validity and reliability of the 64-item Measure of School Capacity for Improvement (MSCI). The MSCI was designed to assess the degree to which schools possess the potential to become high performing learning communities, and was developed in response to a paucity of definition, operationalization, and assessment of school capacity in the education research and evaluation literature. The MSCI offers an operationalization of the concept of school capacity. The MSCI was administered to 1,274 professional staff affiliated with 12 elementary, 10 middle, and 13 high schools in Tennessee that were low performing, predominantly African American, and low SES. Results of factor analysis and estimates of internal consistency suggest that the MSCI and 58 of the original items, which comprise six subscales, are very reliable and has construct validity. Moreover, the MSCI holds some promise for providing a much-needed means for discerning schools with the resources, practices, and proclivities to successfully undertake serious development from those who might better focus their energies on first addressing the issues measured by the various MSCI subscales. |
| Abstractor: | Author |
| Number of References: | 81 |
| Entry Date: | 2005 |
| Accession Number: | ED484850 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED484850 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED484850 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Measure of School Capacity for Improvement (MSCI): Early Field Test Findings – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Riffle%2C+M%2E+J%2E+S%2E%22">Riffle, M. J. S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Howley%2C+C%2E+W%2E%22">Howley, C. W.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ermolov%2C+L%2E+D%2E%22">Ermolov, L. D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Appalachia+Educational+Lab%2E%2C+Charleston%2C+WV%2E%22">Appalachia Educational Lab., Charleston, WV.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22AEL%22"><i>AEL</i></searchLink>. 2004. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: AEL, Post Office Box 1348, Charleston, WV 25325-1348. Tel: 800-624-9120 (Toll Free); Fax: 304-347-0487; e-mail: aelinfo@ael.org; Web site: http://www.ael.org. – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 36 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2004 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Reliability%22">Test Reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Validity%22">Test Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Construct+Validity%22">Construct Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Access+to+Computers%22">Access to Computers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Improvement%22">Educational Improvement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Quality%22">Educational Quality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Effectiveness%22">Teacher Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equal+Education%22">Equal Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Expectations+of+Students%22">Teacher Expectations of Students</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study was conducted to confirm the validity and reliability of the 64-item Measure of School Capacity for Improvement (MSCI). The MSCI was designed to assess the degree to which schools possess the potential to become high performing learning communities, and was developed in response to a paucity of definition, operationalization, and assessment of school capacity in the education research and evaluation literature. The MSCI offers an operationalization of the concept of school capacity. The MSCI was administered to 1,274 professional staff affiliated with 12 elementary, 10 middle, and 13 high schools in Tennessee that were low performing, predominantly African American, and low SES. Results of factor analysis and estimates of internal consistency suggest that the MSCI and 58 of the original items, which comprise six subscales, are very reliable and has construct validity. Moreover, the MSCI holds some promise for providing a much-needed means for discerning schools with the resources, practices, and proclivities to successfully undertake serious development from those who might better focus their energies on first addressing the issues measured by the various MSCI subscales. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: Author – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 81 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2005 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED484850 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED484850 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 36 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Test Reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Construct Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Access to Computers Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Improvement Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Quality Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Equal Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Expectations of Students Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Measure of School Capacity for Improvement (MSCI): Early Field Test Findings Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Appalachia Educational Lab., Charleston, WV. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Riffle, M. J. S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Howley, C. W. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ermolov, L. D. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 14 M: 04 Type: published Y: 2004 Titles: – TitleFull: AEL Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |