The Impact of High Stakes Accountability on Teachers' Professional Development: Evidence from the South. A Final Report to the Spencer Foundation
Saved in:
| Title: | The Impact of High Stakes Accountability on Teachers' Professional Development: Evidence from the South. A Final Report to the Spencer Foundation |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Berry, Barnett, Turchi, Laura, Johnson, Dylan, Hare, Dwight, Owens, Deborah Duncan, Clements, Steve, Southeast Center for Teaching Quality, Chapel Hill, NC. |
| Source: | Southeast Center for Teaching Quality. 2003. |
| Availability: | Southeast Center for Teaching Quality. 976 Airport Road Suite 250, Chapel Hill, NC 27514. Tel: 919-951-0200; e-mail: contactus@teachingquality.org; Web site: http://www.teachingquality.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 44 |
| Publication Date: | 2003 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Spencer Foundation, Chicago, IL. |
| Document Type: | Reports - Descriptive |
| Education Level: | Elementary Secondary Education Grade 4 |
| Descriptors: | Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Educational Opportunities, Professional Development, Instructional Leadership, Teaching Methods, High Stakes Tests, Faculty Development, Case Studies, Work Environment, Test Results, Federal Legislation, Teacher Collaboration, Elementary Secondary Education |
| Geographic Terms: | Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee |
| Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: | No Child Left Behind Act 2001 |
| Abstract: | This report presents the case-study findings from a cross-state investigation focused on Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee, intended to deepen understanding around the influence of high stakes accountability on teacher learning and the capacity of districts and schools to support instructional practices that bolster student performance. Researchers sought to answer questions related to: (1) the impact of different accountability and professional development policies in the six states; (2) how teachers respond to those learning opportunities in light of high stakes accountability; and (3) the relationship between high stakes accountability, teachers' professional development, and student achievement. Site visits revealed that the high stakes accountability systems influenced teacher learning in a number of ways, helping teachers focus on academic standards, clarifying for them what needs to be taught and how, although seeking to understand under what conditions accountability systems would most likely promote effective professional development. None of the systems in which the 24 observed schools operated could produce a comprehensive set of indicators based on such an assumption. Findings suggest that to do so would require new ways to measure and report on school leadership, professional development opportunities, and teacher working conditions. The following is appended: Sample NAEP Grade Items--Math and Reading. (Contains 3 footnotes and 4 tables.) |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Number of References: | 40 |
| Entry Date: | 2007 |
| Accession Number: | ED499079 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED499079 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED499079 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Impact of High Stakes Accountability on Teachers' Professional Development: Evidence from the South. A Final Report to the Spencer Foundation – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Berry%2C+Barnett%22">Berry, Barnett</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Turchi%2C+Laura%22">Turchi, Laura</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Johnson%2C+Dylan%22">Johnson, Dylan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hare%2C+Dwight%22">Hare, Dwight</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Owens%2C+Deborah+Duncan%22">Owens, Deborah Duncan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Clements%2C+Steve%22">Clements, Steve</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Southeast+Center+for+Teaching+Quality%2C+Chapel+Hill%2C+NC%2E%22">Southeast Center for Teaching Quality, Chapel Hill, NC.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Southeast+Center+for+Teaching+Quality%22"><i>Southeast Center for Teaching Quality</i></searchLink>. 2003. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Southeast Center for Teaching Quality. 976 Airport Road Suite 250, Chapel Hill, NC 27514. Tel: 919-951-0200; e-mail: contactus@teachingquality.org; Web site: http://www.teachingquality.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 44 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2003 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Spencer Foundation, Chicago, IL. – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Descriptive – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+4%22">Grade 4</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Standards%22">Academic Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Opportunities%22">Educational Opportunities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+Development%22">Professional Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Leadership%22">Instructional Leadership</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+Stakes+Tests%22">High Stakes Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Development%22">Faculty Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Case+Studies%22">Case Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work+Environment%22">Work Environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Results%22">Test Results</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Legislation%22">Federal Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Collaboration%22">Teacher Collaboration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Georgia%22">Georgia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Kentucky%22">Kentucky</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mississippi%22">Mississippi</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22North+Carolina%22">North Carolina</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22South+Carolina%22">South Carolina</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tennessee%22">Tennessee</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22No+Child+Left+Behind+Act+2001%22">No Child Left Behind Act 2001</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This report presents the case-study findings from a cross-state investigation focused on Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee, intended to deepen understanding around the influence of high stakes accountability on teacher learning and the capacity of districts and schools to support instructional practices that bolster student performance. Researchers sought to answer questions related to: (1) the impact of different accountability and professional development policies in the six states; (2) how teachers respond to those learning opportunities in light of high stakes accountability; and (3) the relationship between high stakes accountability, teachers' professional development, and student achievement. Site visits revealed that the high stakes accountability systems influenced teacher learning in a number of ways, helping teachers focus on academic standards, clarifying for them what needs to be taught and how, although seeking to understand under what conditions accountability systems would most likely promote effective professional development. None of the systems in which the 24 observed schools operated could produce a comprehensive set of indicators based on such an assumption. Findings suggest that to do so would require new ways to measure and report on school leadership, professional development opportunities, and teacher working conditions. The following is appended: Sample NAEP Grade Items--Math and Reading. (Contains 3 footnotes and 4 tables.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 40 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2007 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED499079 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED499079 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 44 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Accountability Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Opportunities Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Leadership Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: High Stakes Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Faculty Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Case Studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Work Environment Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Results Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Legislation Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Collaboration Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Georgia Type: general – SubjectFull: Kentucky Type: general – SubjectFull: Mississippi Type: general – SubjectFull: North Carolina Type: general – SubjectFull: South Carolina Type: general – SubjectFull: Tennessee Type: general – SubjectFull: No Child Left Behind Act 2001 Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Impact of High Stakes Accountability on Teachers' Professional Development: Evidence from the South. A Final Report to the Spencer Foundation Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Southeast Center for Teaching Quality, Chapel Hill, NC. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Berry, Barnett – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Turchi, Laura – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Johnson, Dylan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hare, Dwight – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Owens, Deborah Duncan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Clements, Steve IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 15 M: 11 Type: published Y: 2003 Titles: – TitleFull: Southeast Center for Teaching Quality Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |