New Relationship with Schools: Evaluation of Trial Local Authorities and Schools. RR689
Saved in:
| Title: | New Relationship with Schools: Evaluation of Trial Local Authorities and Schools. RR689 |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Halsey, Karen, Judkins, Michelle, Atkinson, Mary, Rudd, Peter, Department for Education and Skills |
| Source: | National Foundation for Educational Research. 2005. |
| Availability: | National Foundation for Educational Research. The Mere, Upton Park, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 2DQ, UK. Tel: +44-1753-574123; Fax: +44-1753-637280; e-mail: enquiries@nfer.ac.uk; Web site: http://www.nfer.ac.uk |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 111 |
| Publication Date: | 2005 |
| Document Type: | Numerical/Quantitative Data Reports - Evaluative |
| Education Level: | Elementary Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Inspection, Educational Change, Administrative Organization, Profiles, Educational Policy, Program Evaluation, School Districts, Case Studies, Administrator Attitudes, Questionnaires, Principals, Surveys, Self Evaluation (Groups), Educational Improvement, Improvement Programs, Academic Standards, School Administration, Educational Principles, Administrative Principles, Program Effectiveness, Consultation Programs, Government School Relationship, Foreign Countries, Demonstration Programs, Change Strategies, Public Schools |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom |
| ISBN: | 978-1-84478-583-4 |
| Abstract: | This summary outlines the key findings from a national evaluation of the first-year trials of the New Relationship with Schools (NRwS) carried out by a team at the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER). The trials took place in the period September 2004 to July 2005 and involved 93 schools in eight local educational authorities (LEAs). The New Relationship was first announced in January 2004 after schools and the DfES had highlighted bureaucracy as an ongoing issue in both primary and secondary schools, citing a need for a new relationship between the DfES, LEAs and schools and a need for closer alignment of national and local priorities. "A New Relationship with Schools" proposed "a cluster of interlocking changes that will affect school inspection, schools' relations with local and central government, schools' self-evaluation and planning, data collection from schools, and communications with schools." Findings are based on a questionnaire survey of NRwS headteachers and two waves of in-depth interviews carried out as part of school and local authority case-study visits. The evaluation focused on the four school reform strands of the NRwS: (1) School Self-Evaluation; (2) School Profile; (3) Single Conversation; and (4) and the School Improvement Partner (SIP). The study also aimed to look at processes behind the implementation of these strands, to assess the extent to which the NRwS had: (1) helped schools to raise standards; (2) reduced bureaucracy in the current system; (3) more closely aligned national and local priorities; and (4) released greater local initiative and energy in schools. In evaluation of first-year trials, interviewees expressed need for guidance and training to both schools and local authorities so that they would fully understand the NRwS and the pivotal role of the SIP. Successful implementation was also felt to rely on the degree to which the NRwS was viewed, overall, as a positive and progressive development for schools, and interviewees expressed a view that time and thought needs to be given to promoting the NRwS nationally, raising its profile to ensure that both schools and local authorities are fully on board with underlying principles. (Contains 5 footnotes and 12 tables. |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Number of References: | 5 |
| Entry Date: | 2008 |
| Accession Number: | ED502603 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED502603 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED502603 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Electronic Resource PubTypeId: electronicResource PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: New Relationship with Schools: Evaluation of Trial Local Authorities and Schools. RR689 – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Halsey%2C+Karen%22">Halsey, Karen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Judkins%2C+Michelle%22">Judkins, Michelle</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Atkinson%2C+Mary%22">Atkinson, Mary</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rudd%2C+Peter%22">Rudd, Peter</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Department+for+Education+and+Skills%22">Department for Education and Skills</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22National+Foundation+for+Educational+Research%22"><i>National Foundation for Educational Research</i></searchLink>. 2005. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: National Foundation for Educational Research. The Mere, Upton Park, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 2DQ, UK. Tel: +44-1753-574123; Fax: +44-1753-637280; e-mail: enquiries@nfer.ac.uk; Web site: http://www.nfer.ac.uk – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 111 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2005 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Numerical/Quantitative Data<br />Reports - Evaluative – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inspection%22">Inspection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrative+Organization%22">Administrative Organization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Profiles%22">Profiles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Districts%22">School Districts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Case+Studies%22">Case Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrator+Attitudes%22">Administrator Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Principals%22">Principals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Evaluation+%28Groups%29%22">Self Evaluation (Groups)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Improvement%22">Educational Improvement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Improvement+Programs%22">Improvement Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Standards%22">Academic Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Administration%22">School Administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Principles%22">Educational Principles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrative+Principles%22">Administrative Principles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Consultation+Programs%22">Consultation Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+School+Relationship%22">Government School Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Demonstration+Programs%22">Demonstration Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Change+Strategies%22">Change Strategies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Schools%22">Public Schools</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink> – Name: ISBN Label: ISBN Group: ISBN Data: 978-1-84478-583-4 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This summary outlines the key findings from a national evaluation of the first-year trials of the New Relationship with Schools (NRwS) carried out by a team at the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER). The trials took place in the period September 2004 to July 2005 and involved 93 schools in eight local educational authorities (LEAs). The New Relationship was first announced in January 2004 after schools and the DfES had highlighted bureaucracy as an ongoing issue in both primary and secondary schools, citing a need for a new relationship between the DfES, LEAs and schools and a need for closer alignment of national and local priorities. "A New Relationship with Schools" proposed "a cluster of interlocking changes that will affect school inspection, schools' relations with local and central government, schools' self-evaluation and planning, data collection from schools, and communications with schools." Findings are based on a questionnaire survey of NRwS headteachers and two waves of in-depth interviews carried out as part of school and local authority case-study visits. The evaluation focused on the four school reform strands of the NRwS: (1) School Self-Evaluation; (2) School Profile; (3) Single Conversation; and (4) and the School Improvement Partner (SIP). The study also aimed to look at processes behind the implementation of these strands, to assess the extent to which the NRwS had: (1) helped schools to raise standards; (2) reduced bureaucracy in the current system; (3) more closely aligned national and local priorities; and (4) released greater local initiative and energy in schools. In evaluation of first-year trials, interviewees expressed need for guidance and training to both schools and local authorities so that they would fully understand the NRwS and the pivotal role of the SIP. Successful implementation was also felt to rely on the degree to which the NRwS was viewed, overall, as a positive and progressive development for schools, and interviewees expressed a view that time and thought needs to be given to promoting the NRwS nationally, raising its profile to ensure that both schools and local authorities are fully on board with underlying principles. (Contains 5 footnotes and 12 tables. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 5 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2008 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED502603 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED502603 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 111 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Inspection Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Change Type: general – SubjectFull: Administrative Organization Type: general – SubjectFull: Profiles Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: School Districts Type: general – SubjectFull: Case Studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Administrator Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Principals Type: general – SubjectFull: Surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: Self Evaluation (Groups) Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Improvement Type: general – SubjectFull: Improvement Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Standards Type: general – SubjectFull: School Administration Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Principles Type: general – SubjectFull: Administrative Principles Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Consultation Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Government School Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Demonstration Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Change Strategies Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: New Relationship with Schools: Evaluation of Trial Local Authorities and Schools. RR689 Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Department for Education and Skills – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Halsey, Karen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Judkins, Michelle – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Atkinson, Mary – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rudd, Peter IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2005 Identifiers: – Type: isbn-print Value: 978-1-84478-583-4 Titles: – TitleFull: National Foundation for Educational Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |