Cognitive Rigor: Blending the Strengths of Bloom's Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge to Enhance Classroom-Level Processes
Saved in:
| Title: | Cognitive Rigor: Blending the Strengths of Bloom's Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge to Enhance Classroom-Level Processes |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Hess, Karin K., Jones, Ben S., Carlock, Dennis, Walkup, John R. |
| Source: | Online Submission. 2009. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 8 |
| Publication Date: | 2009 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Educational Objectives, Classification, Matrices, Curriculum Development, Cognitive Processes, Test Items, Public Schools, Language Arts, Mathematics Education, English Instruction, Mathematics Instruction, Evaluation, Lesson Plans, Item Sampling, Mathematics, Work Sample Tests |
| Geographic Terms: | Nevada, Oklahoma |
| Abstract: | To teach the rigorous skills and knowledge students need to succeed in future college-entry courses and workforce training programs, education stakeholders have increasingly called for more rigorous curricula, instruction, and assessments. Identifying the critical attributes of rigor and measuring its appearance in curricular materials is therefore fundamental to progress in this area. By superposing two widely accepted models for describing rigor--Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives and Webb's Depth-of- Knowledge (DOK) model--this article defines cognitive rigor (CR) and introduces the CR matrix for analyzing instruction and enhancing teacher lesson planning. Two large-scale collections of student work samples analyzed using the CR matrix are presented, illustrating the preponderance of curricular items aligned to each cell in the matrix. Educators should use the cognitive rigor matrix to align the content in their curricular materials to the instructional techniques used in classroom delivery. (Contains 3 tables and 1 figure.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 14 |
| Entry Date: | 2011 |
| Accession Number: | ED517804 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED517804 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED517804 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Cognitive Rigor: Blending the Strengths of Bloom's Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge to Enhance Classroom-Level Processes – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hess%2C+Karin+K%2E%22">Hess, Karin K.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jones%2C+Ben+S%2E%22">Jones, Ben S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Carlock%2C+Dennis%22">Carlock, Dennis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Walkup%2C+John+R%2E%22">Walkup, John R.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Online+Submission%22"><i>Online Submission</i></searchLink>. 2009. – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 8 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2009 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Objectives%22">Educational Objectives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classification%22">Classification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Matrices%22">Matrices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Development%22">Curriculum Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Items%22">Test Items</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Schools%22">Public Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Arts%22">Language Arts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Education%22">Mathematics Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+Instruction%22">English Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Instruction%22">Mathematics Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation%22">Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lesson+Plans%22">Lesson Plans</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Item+Sampling%22">Item Sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics%22">Mathematics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work+Sample+Tests%22">Work Sample Tests</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nevada%22">Nevada</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Oklahoma%22">Oklahoma</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: To teach the rigorous skills and knowledge students need to succeed in future college-entry courses and workforce training programs, education stakeholders have increasingly called for more rigorous curricula, instruction, and assessments. Identifying the critical attributes of rigor and measuring its appearance in curricular materials is therefore fundamental to progress in this area. By superposing two widely accepted models for describing rigor--Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives and Webb's Depth-of- Knowledge (DOK) model--this article defines cognitive rigor (CR) and introduces the CR matrix for analyzing instruction and enhancing teacher lesson planning. Two large-scale collections of student work samples analyzed using the CR matrix are presented, illustrating the preponderance of curricular items aligned to each cell in the matrix. Educators should use the cognitive rigor matrix to align the content in their curricular materials to the instructional techniques used in classroom delivery. (Contains 3 tables and 1 figure.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 14 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2011 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED517804 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED517804 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Educational Objectives Type: general – SubjectFull: Classification Type: general – SubjectFull: Matrices Type: general – SubjectFull: Curriculum Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Items Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Arts Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Education Type: general – SubjectFull: English Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Lesson Plans Type: general – SubjectFull: Item Sampling Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Type: general – SubjectFull: Work Sample Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Nevada Type: general – SubjectFull: Oklahoma Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Cognitive Rigor: Blending the Strengths of Bloom's Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge to Enhance Classroom-Level Processes Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hess, Karin K. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jones, Ben S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Carlock, Dennis – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Walkup, John R. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 07 M: 03 Type: published Y: 2009 Titles: – TitleFull: Online Submission Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |