Differences in Spending in School Districts across Geographic Locales in Minnesota. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 124

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Differences in Spending in School Districts across Geographic Locales in Minnesota. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 124
Language: English
Authors: Wan, Yinmei, Norbury, Heather, Molefe, Ayrin C., Gerdeman, R. Dean, Meyers, Coby V., Burke, Matthew, Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest (ED)
Source: Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. 2012.
Availability: Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. Available from: Learning Point Associates. 1120 East Diehl Road Suite 200, Naperville, IL 60563. Tel: 866-730-6735; Fax: 630-649-6700; e-mail: relmidwest@learningpt.org; Web site: http://www.learningpt.org/rel/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 51
Publication Date: 2012
Document Type: Numerical/Quantitative Data
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Descriptors: School Districts, School District Spending, Expenditure per Student, Elementary Secondary Education, Regional Characteristics, Differences, Rural Urban Differences, Student Needs, Instruction, School Administration, Student Transportation, Pupil Personnel Services, Enrollment
Geographic Terms: Minnesota
Abstract: This study examines the relationship between school district expenditures and district characteristics, including regional features (enrollment size, student population density, labor costs, and geographic remoteness) and level of student need (percentages of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, of special education students, and of English language learner students). Prior research has found that each of these factors has been associated with differences in expenditures across districts. This study examines five types of district spending per student for prekindergarten-grade 12: general fund expenditures, instruction and instruction-related expenditures, administration expenditures, student support expenditures, and transportation expenditures. The analysis finds that during the 2008/09 school year, rural districts accounted for 65 percent of Minnesota school districts and 25 percent of students. Further, district expenditures, regional characteristics, and level of student need varied across locale types. Expenditure patterns across locales differed with the type of expenditure. Total general fund expenditures per student and instruction and instruction-related expenditures per student were highest in city districts and above the state average in suburban, rural-remote, and town-remote districts. Student support expenditure per student was highest in city districts and lowest in town-remote and town-distant districts. Administration and transportation expenditures per student were above average in rural-remote and city districts and below average in the remaining locales. Regional characteristics and level of student need also varied across locale types. Compared with other locales, rural-remote districts had lower enrollment, lower student population density, longer drive time to the center of the nearest urban area, and higher percentages of special education students and students eligible or reduced-price lunch (a measure of economic disadvantage). Within rural and town districts, the percentage of special education students and economically disadvantaged students increased with remoteness. The percentage of English language learner students was highest in city and suburban districts. Regression analysis indicated that once regional characteristics and levels of student need were taken into account, district locale was not a statistically significant predictor of expenditures per student on administration, student support services, and transportation. Differences across locales in total general fund expenditures per student and instruction and instruction-related expenditures per student remained statistically significant predictors, but their shares in the overall variation in these expenditures fell considerably (from 16 percent to 3 percent for total general fund expenditures and from 19 percent to 6 percent for instruction expenditures). For these two expenditure types, only differences between town-remote districts and rural-remote and rural-distant districts were statistically significant. On the whole, regional characteristics and level of student need accounted for much of the variation in expenditures per student between districts in different geographic locales, but unexplained differences remained for Minnesota's most remote town and most remote rural districts. Appended are: (1) The literature on financing rural education; (2) Data and data sources; (3) Sample statistics and methodology; (4) Regression model results; and (5) Outliers dropped from the regression analysis. (Contains 3 boxes, 21 figures, 13 tables and 28 notes.) [For "Differences in Spending in School Districts across Geographic Locales in Minnesota. Summary. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 124," see ED532662.]
Abstractor: ERIC
Number of References: 51
IES Funded: Yes
IES Publication: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=275
Entry Date: 2012
Accession Number: ED532664
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED532664
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED532664
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Electronic Resource
PubTypeId: electronicResource
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Differences in Spending in School Districts across Geographic Locales in Minnesota. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 124
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wan%2C+Yinmei%22">Wan, Yinmei</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Norbury%2C+Heather%22">Norbury, Heather</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Molefe%2C+Ayrin+C%2E%22">Molefe, Ayrin C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gerdeman%2C+R%2E+Dean%22">Gerdeman, R. Dean</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meyers%2C+Coby+V%2E%22">Meyers, Coby V.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burke%2C+Matthew%22">Burke, Matthew</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Regional+Educational+Laboratory+Midwest+%28ED%29%22">Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest (ED)</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Regional+Educational+Laboratory+Midwest%22"><i>Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest</i></searchLink>. 2012.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. Available from: Learning Point Associates. 1120 East Diehl Road Suite 200, Naperville, IL 60563. Tel: 866-730-6735; Fax: 630-649-6700; e-mail: relmidwest@learningpt.org; Web site: http://www.learningpt.org/rel/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 51
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2012
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Numerical/Quantitative Data<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Districts%22">School Districts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+District+Spending%22">School District Spending</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Expenditure+per+Student%22">Expenditure per Student</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regional+Characteristics%22">Regional Characteristics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Differences%22">Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rural+Urban+Differences%22">Rural Urban Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Needs%22">Student Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instruction%22">Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Administration%22">School Administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Transportation%22">Student Transportation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pupil+Personnel+Services%22">Pupil Personnel Services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Enrollment%22">Enrollment</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minnesota%22">Minnesota</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study examines the relationship between school district expenditures and district characteristics, including regional features (enrollment size, student population density, labor costs, and geographic remoteness) and level of student need (percentages of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, of special education students, and of English language learner students). Prior research has found that each of these factors has been associated with differences in expenditures across districts. This study examines five types of district spending per student for prekindergarten-grade 12: general fund expenditures, instruction and instruction-related expenditures, administration expenditures, student support expenditures, and transportation expenditures. The analysis finds that during the 2008/09 school year, rural districts accounted for 65 percent of Minnesota school districts and 25 percent of students. Further, district expenditures, regional characteristics, and level of student need varied across locale types. Expenditure patterns across locales differed with the type of expenditure. Total general fund expenditures per student and instruction and instruction-related expenditures per student were highest in city districts and above the state average in suburban, rural-remote, and town-remote districts. Student support expenditure per student was highest in city districts and lowest in town-remote and town-distant districts. Administration and transportation expenditures per student were above average in rural-remote and city districts and below average in the remaining locales. Regional characteristics and level of student need also varied across locale types. Compared with other locales, rural-remote districts had lower enrollment, lower student population density, longer drive time to the center of the nearest urban area, and higher percentages of special education students and students eligible or reduced-price lunch (a measure of economic disadvantage). Within rural and town districts, the percentage of special education students and economically disadvantaged students increased with remoteness. The percentage of English language learner students was highest in city and suburban districts. Regression analysis indicated that once regional characteristics and levels of student need were taken into account, district locale was not a statistically significant predictor of expenditures per student on administration, student support services, and transportation. Differences across locales in total general fund expenditures per student and instruction and instruction-related expenditures per student remained statistically significant predictors, but their shares in the overall variation in these expenditures fell considerably (from 16 percent to 3 percent for total general fund expenditures and from 19 percent to 6 percent for instruction expenditures). For these two expenditure types, only differences between town-remote districts and rural-remote and rural-distant districts were statistically significant. On the whole, regional characteristics and level of student need accounted for much of the variation in expenditures per student between districts in different geographic locales, but unexplained differences remained for Minnesota's most remote town and most remote rural districts. Appended are: (1) The literature on financing rural education; (2) Data and data sources; (3) Sample statistics and methodology; (4) Regression model results; and (5) Outliers dropped from the regression analysis. (Contains 3 boxes, 21 figures, 13 tables and 28 notes.) [For "Differences in Spending in School Districts across Geographic Locales in Minnesota. Summary. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 124," see ED532662.]
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: ERIC
– Name: Ref
  Label: Number of References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: 51
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: IES Funded
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Yes
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: IES Publication
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=275" linkWindow="_blank">http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=275</link>
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2012
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED532664
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED532664
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 51
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: School Districts
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School District Spending
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Expenditure per Student
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Regional Characteristics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Rural Urban Differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Needs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School Administration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Transportation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pupil Personnel Services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Enrollment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Minnesota
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Differences in Spending in School Districts across Geographic Locales in Minnesota. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 124
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest (ED)
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wan, Yinmei
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Norbury, Heather
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Molefe, Ayrin C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gerdeman, R. Dean
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Meyers, Coby V.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Burke, Matthew
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Type: published
              Y: 2012
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest
              Type: main
ResultId 1