Establishing and Sustaining Networked Improvement Communities: Lessons from Michigan and Minnesota. REL 2017-264
Saved in:
| Title: | Establishing and Sustaining Networked Improvement Communities: Lessons from Michigan and Minnesota. REL 2017-264 |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Proger, Amy R., Bhatt, Monica P., Cirks, Victoria, Gurke, Deb, Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest (ED), American Institutes for Research (AIR), National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (ED) |
| Source: | Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. 2017. |
| Availability: | Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. Available from: Institute of Education Sciences. 555 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20208. Tel: 800-872-5327; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 28 |
| Publication Date: | 2017 |
| Contract Number: | EDIES12C0004 |
| Intended Audience: | Researchers; Policymakers |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Partnerships in Education, Improvement Programs, Educational Cooperation, Communities of Practice, Networks, Capacity Building, State Departments of Education, Educational Improvement, Instructional Improvement, Science Course Improvement Projects, Achievement Gap, Program Implementation, School Districts |
| Geographic Terms: | Michigan, Minnesota |
| Abstract: | There is growing interest in the ability of improvement science--the systematic study of improvement strategies to identify promising practices for addressing issues in complex systems (Improvement Science Research Network, 2016)--to spur innovation and address complex problems. In education this methodology is often implemented through collaborative research partnerships in which researchers and practitioners work together to systematically test and refine theories of change in real-world settings. A networked improvement community is a collaborative research partnership that uses the principles of improvement science within networks of organizations to learn from varied implementation of new ideas across contexts. While the central work of a networked improvement community is to identify a specific and actionable problem and collectively address it through an iterative process of designing, implementing, testing, and redesigning promising new practices, the learning from these iterative cycles can be brought back and applied to the local contexts of the networked improvement community participants (such as classrooms, districts, and states), potentially affecting education practices more widely. Although there is practical guidance for how networked improvement communities should structure this work, few published accounts describe the process of forming a networked improvement community. This report describes the process of forming networked improvement communities in Michigan and Minnesota after state education agency leaders requested assistance from Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Midwest to support state-led efforts to use improvement science to raise student achievement and narrow achievement gaps in schools with the widest achievement gaps (focus schools). The resulting collaborations led to the establishment of two networked improvement communities during the 2015/16 school year, one in Michigan and one in Minnesota, focused on improvement in schools identified as needing support under their accountability systems. The REL Midwest project team used guidance from the literature and other improvement science efforts (for example, Bryk, Gomez, Grunow, & LeMahieu, 2015) to direct its activities. Each networked improvement community has a slightly different history and emphasis. The Michigan Focus Networked Improvement Community works across five focus schools --schools with the largest achievement gaps--in two districts to address disparities in student achievement within schools. The two districts are each part of an intermediate school district, a regional education service agency that provides consolidated support services to districts in an assigned service area and thereby plays an important role in providing professional development and supporting pilot programs in districts. Participants in the Michigan Focus Networked Improvement Community include state education agency representatives, intermediate school district administrators, district representatives, and focus school principals. The Minnesota Statewide System of Support Networked Improvement Community seeks to improve state supports to six Regional Centers of Excellence that serve focus schools. In Minnesota, the Cross-agency Implementation Team oversees the implementation of the statewide system of support. Its members include leadership and content specialists from both the Minnesota Department of Education and the Regional Centers of Excellence; they also serve as participants in the networked improvement community. The goal of establishing both networked improvement communities was twofold: to expose the state education agencies to a process that could be used to scale initiatives and to engage agencies at a level that would leave them able to use the process with other initiatives. Networked improvement community participants are now focusing on sustainability, using what they learned in the first year as the foundation for maintaining key processes and functions. This report aims to guide other researchers, state education agency leaders, and district leaders as they establish networked improvement communities in different contexts. The following are appended: (1) Sample activities to define the problem and identify root causes; and (2) Frequently asked questions about networked improvement communities. |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Number of References: | 20 |
| IES Funded: | Yes |
| IES Publication: | https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=4556 |
| Entry Date: | 2017 |
| Accession Number: | ED573419 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED573419 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED573419 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Establishing and Sustaining Networked Improvement Communities: Lessons from Michigan and Minnesota. REL 2017-264 – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Proger%2C+Amy+R%2E%22">Proger, Amy R.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bhatt%2C+Monica+P%2E%22">Bhatt, Monica P.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cirks%2C+Victoria%22">Cirks, Victoria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gurke%2C+Deb%22">Gurke, Deb</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Regional+Educational+Laboratory+Midwest+%28ED%29%22">Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest (ED)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22American+Institutes+for+Research+%28AIR%29%22">American Institutes for Research (AIR)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22National+Center+for+Education+Evaluation+and+Regional+Assistance+%28ED%29%22">National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (ED)</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Regional+Educational+Laboratory+Midwest%22"><i>Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest</i></searchLink>. 2017. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. Available from: Institute of Education Sciences. 555 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20208. Tel: 800-872-5327; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 28 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2017 – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: EDIES12C0004 – Name: Audience Label: Intended Audience Group: Audnce Data: Researchers; Policymakers – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Evaluative – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Partnerships+in+Education%22">Partnerships in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Improvement+Programs%22">Improvement Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Cooperation%22">Educational Cooperation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communities+of+Practice%22">Communities of Practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Networks%22">Networks</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Capacity+Building%22">Capacity Building</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Departments+of+Education%22">State Departments of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Improvement%22">Educational Improvement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Improvement%22">Instructional Improvement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Course+Improvement+Projects%22">Science Course Improvement Projects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Achievement+Gap%22">Achievement Gap</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Implementation%22">Program Implementation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Districts%22">School Districts</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Michigan%22">Michigan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minnesota%22">Minnesota</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: There is growing interest in the ability of improvement science--the systematic study of improvement strategies to identify promising practices for addressing issues in complex systems (Improvement Science Research Network, 2016)--to spur innovation and address complex problems. In education this methodology is often implemented through collaborative research partnerships in which researchers and practitioners work together to systematically test and refine theories of change in real-world settings. A networked improvement community is a collaborative research partnership that uses the principles of improvement science within networks of organizations to learn from varied implementation of new ideas across contexts. While the central work of a networked improvement community is to identify a specific and actionable problem and collectively address it through an iterative process of designing, implementing, testing, and redesigning promising new practices, the learning from these iterative cycles can be brought back and applied to the local contexts of the networked improvement community participants (such as classrooms, districts, and states), potentially affecting education practices more widely. Although there is practical guidance for how networked improvement communities should structure this work, few published accounts describe the process of forming a networked improvement community. This report describes the process of forming networked improvement communities in Michigan and Minnesota after state education agency leaders requested assistance from Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Midwest to support state-led efforts to use improvement science to raise student achievement and narrow achievement gaps in schools with the widest achievement gaps (focus schools). The resulting collaborations led to the establishment of two networked improvement communities during the 2015/16 school year, one in Michigan and one in Minnesota, focused on improvement in schools identified as needing support under their accountability systems. The REL Midwest project team used guidance from the literature and other improvement science efforts (for example, Bryk, Gomez, Grunow, & LeMahieu, 2015) to direct its activities. Each networked improvement community has a slightly different history and emphasis. The Michigan Focus Networked Improvement Community works across five focus schools --schools with the largest achievement gaps--in two districts to address disparities in student achievement within schools. The two districts are each part of an intermediate school district, a regional education service agency that provides consolidated support services to districts in an assigned service area and thereby plays an important role in providing professional development and supporting pilot programs in districts. Participants in the Michigan Focus Networked Improvement Community include state education agency representatives, intermediate school district administrators, district representatives, and focus school principals. The Minnesota Statewide System of Support Networked Improvement Community seeks to improve state supports to six Regional Centers of Excellence that serve focus schools. In Minnesota, the Cross-agency Implementation Team oversees the implementation of the statewide system of support. Its members include leadership and content specialists from both the Minnesota Department of Education and the Regional Centers of Excellence; they also serve as participants in the networked improvement community. The goal of establishing both networked improvement communities was twofold: to expose the state education agencies to a process that could be used to scale initiatives and to engage agencies at a level that would leave them able to use the process with other initiatives. Networked improvement community participants are now focusing on sustainability, using what they learned in the first year as the foundation for maintaining key processes and functions. This report aims to guide other researchers, state education agency leaders, and district leaders as they establish networked improvement communities in different contexts. The following are appended: (1) Sample activities to define the problem and identify root causes; and (2) Frequently asked questions about networked improvement communities. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 20 – Name: CodeSource Label: IES Funded Group: SrcInfo Data: Yes – Name: CodeSource Label: IES Publication Group: SrcInfo Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=4556" linkWindow="_blank">https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=4556</link> – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2017 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED573419 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED573419 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 28 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Partnerships in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Improvement Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Cooperation Type: general – SubjectFull: Communities of Practice Type: general – SubjectFull: Networks Type: general – SubjectFull: Capacity Building Type: general – SubjectFull: State Departments of Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Improvement Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Improvement Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Course Improvement Projects Type: general – SubjectFull: Achievement Gap Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Implementation Type: general – SubjectFull: School Districts Type: general – SubjectFull: Michigan Type: general – SubjectFull: Minnesota Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Establishing and Sustaining Networked Improvement Communities: Lessons from Michigan and Minnesota. REL 2017-264 Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest (ED) – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: American Institutes for Research (AIR) – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (ED) – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Proger, Amy R. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bhatt, Monica P. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cirks, Victoria – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gurke, Deb IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 2017 Titles: – TitleFull: Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
