Southern Schools: More than a Half-Century after the Civil Rights Revolution
Saved in:
| Title: | Southern Schools: More than a Half-Century after the Civil Rights Revolution |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Frankenberg, Erica, Hawley, Genevieve Siegel, Ee, Jongyeon, Orfield, Gary, University of California, Los Angeles. Civil Rights Project / Proyecto Derechos Civiles, Pennsylvania State University, Center for Education and Civil Rights (CECR) |
| Source: | Civil Rights Project - Proyecto Derechos Civiles. 2017. |
| Availability: | Civil Rights Project / Proyecto Derechos Civiles. 8370 Math Sciences, P.O. Box 951521, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1521. Tel: 310-267-5562; Fax: 310-206-6293; e-mail: crp@ucla.edu; Web site: http://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 18 |
| Publication Date: | 2017 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative |
| Education Level: | Elementary Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Geographic Regions, Civil Rights, Educational History, School Desegregation, Court Litigation, Desegregation Litigation, Federal Aid, Federal Legislation, Educational Change, Educational Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Law Enforcement, School Districts, Educational Policy, Educational Environment, Educational Experience, Minority Group Students, School Segregation, Institutional Characteristics, Racial Composition, Charter Schools, Private Schools, Public Schools, Poverty, Enrollment Trends, Statistical Analysis, Graphs |
| Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: | Brown v Board of Education, Elementary and Secondary Education Act |
| Abstract: | The South was the central focus of the "Brown v. Board of Education" decision from the U.S. Supreme Court in 1954. The landmark ruling held that laws mandating segregation in the school systems of the eleven states of the Old Confederacy, along with D.C. and six other states, violated the U.S. Constitution. Intense opposition met the decision across the South. A decade later, 98 percent of black students were still in all-black schools when Congress passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The Act forbade discrimination in any school district receiving federal funds and authorized the Justice Department to sue school systems even if they were willing to give up their federal funds. A year later, federal funding for education increased dramatically through the passage of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, adding an important carrot to federal enforcement efforts. The only serious period of enforcement using these authorities came in the 1965-1968 period which initiated historic changes--making the South the most integrated region of the country by the early 1970s. The Supreme Court clarified and strengthened desegregation laws for the region in the historic decisions in "Green" (1968) and "Swann" (1971). The lower courts also found the Nixon Administration guilty of intentionally ignoring those same laws and forced it to implement urban desegregation in the early 1970s. At desegregation's peak, there were desegregation plans in almost all Southern school districts. Some parts of the South experienced higher levels of desegregation than other major school districts around the country. Between 1973 and 1974, the only major centers of Latino enrollment in the South were in Texas and in southern Florida. There was no Supreme Court recognition of Latino desegregation rights until 1973. By 1974 the Supreme Court made its first decision since Brown limiting desegregation policy. Administrative enforcement also had virtually stopped and Congress had weakened the Civil Rights Act. By the 1980s, the country had a presidential administration firmly opposed to desegregation orders and the Supreme Court's leading opponent of desegregation, was Chief Justice. In 1991, the Supreme Court in the Oklahoma City case (Dowell) authorized courts to dissolve desegregation plans if they thought the districts had accomplished as much as was feasible. The authors have followed the great successes and, in their judgment, the tragic reversals in the region as integrated schools, flourishing for decades under a court order, now turn back, watching their desegregation efforts dissolved. Separate has never been equal. In this report, the authors use two common measures of school segregation that help us to understand the types of school environments that students experience--and how those environments have changed over time. The first is a measure of concentration, or the percentage of students in racially isolated minority schools (those in which at least 90% of students are students of color). The second is the exposure or isolation index, which describes the interracial exposure that the "typical" student experiences in his/her school. If schools were perfectly integrated, the exposure of every group of students would be equal and would be the same as the racial/ethnic composition of the schools. |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Entry Date: | 2017 |
| Accession Number: | ED574545 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED574545 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED574545 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Southern Schools: More than a Half-Century after the Civil Rights Revolution – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Frankenberg%2C+Erica%22">Frankenberg, Erica</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hawley%2C+Genevieve+Siegel%22">Hawley, Genevieve Siegel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ee%2C+Jongyeon%22">Ee, Jongyeon</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Orfield%2C+Gary%22">Orfield, Gary</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22University+of+California%2C+Los+Angeles%2E+Civil+Rights+Project+%2F+Proyecto+Derechos+Civiles%22">University of California, Los Angeles. Civil Rights Project / Proyecto Derechos Civiles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pennsylvania+State+University%2C+Center+for+Education+and+Civil+Rights+%28CECR%29%22">Pennsylvania State University, Center for Education and Civil Rights (CECR)</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Civil+Rights+Project+-+Proyecto+Derechos+Civiles%22"><i>Civil Rights Project - Proyecto Derechos Civiles</i></searchLink>. 2017. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Civil Rights Project / Proyecto Derechos Civiles. 8370 Math Sciences, P.O. Box 951521, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1521. Tel: 310-267-5562; Fax: 310-206-6293; e-mail: crp@ucla.edu; Web site: http://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 18 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2017 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Evaluative – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Geographic+Regions%22">Geographic Regions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Civil+Rights%22">Civil Rights</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+History%22">Educational History</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Desegregation%22">School Desegregation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Court+Litigation%22">Court Litigation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Desegregation+Litigation%22">Desegregation Litigation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Aid%22">Federal Aid</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Legislation%22">Federal Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Legislation%22">Educational Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Law+Enforcement%22">Law Enforcement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Districts%22">School Districts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Environment%22">Educational Environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Experience%22">Educational Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minority+Group+Students%22">Minority Group Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Segregation%22">School Segregation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Institutional+Characteristics%22">Institutional Characteristics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+Composition%22">Racial Composition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Charter+Schools%22">Charter Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Private+Schools%22">Private Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Schools%22">Public Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Poverty%22">Poverty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Enrollment+Trends%22">Enrollment Trends</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graphs%22">Graphs</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Brown+v+Board+of+Education%22">Brown v Board of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Elementary+and+Secondary+Education+Act%22">Elementary and Secondary Education Act</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The South was the central focus of the "Brown v. Board of Education" decision from the U.S. Supreme Court in 1954. The landmark ruling held that laws mandating segregation in the school systems of the eleven states of the Old Confederacy, along with D.C. and six other states, violated the U.S. Constitution. Intense opposition met the decision across the South. A decade later, 98 percent of black students were still in all-black schools when Congress passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The Act forbade discrimination in any school district receiving federal funds and authorized the Justice Department to sue school systems even if they were willing to give up their federal funds. A year later, federal funding for education increased dramatically through the passage of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, adding an important carrot to federal enforcement efforts. The only serious period of enforcement using these authorities came in the 1965-1968 period which initiated historic changes--making the South the most integrated region of the country by the early 1970s. The Supreme Court clarified and strengthened desegregation laws for the region in the historic decisions in "Green" (1968) and "Swann" (1971). The lower courts also found the Nixon Administration guilty of intentionally ignoring those same laws and forced it to implement urban desegregation in the early 1970s. At desegregation's peak, there were desegregation plans in almost all Southern school districts. Some parts of the South experienced higher levels of desegregation than other major school districts around the country. Between 1973 and 1974, the only major centers of Latino enrollment in the South were in Texas and in southern Florida. There was no Supreme Court recognition of Latino desegregation rights until 1973. By 1974 the Supreme Court made its first decision since Brown limiting desegregation policy. Administrative enforcement also had virtually stopped and Congress had weakened the Civil Rights Act. By the 1980s, the country had a presidential administration firmly opposed to desegregation orders and the Supreme Court's leading opponent of desegregation, was Chief Justice. In 1991, the Supreme Court in the Oklahoma City case (Dowell) authorized courts to dissolve desegregation plans if they thought the districts had accomplished as much as was feasible. The authors have followed the great successes and, in their judgment, the tragic reversals in the region as integrated schools, flourishing for decades under a court order, now turn back, watching their desegregation efforts dissolved. Separate has never been equal. In this report, the authors use two common measures of school segregation that help us to understand the types of school environments that students experience--and how those environments have changed over time. The first is a measure of concentration, or the percentage of students in racially isolated minority schools (those in which at least 90% of students are students of color). The second is the exposure or isolation index, which describes the interracial exposure that the "typical" student experiences in his/her school. If schools were perfectly integrated, the exposure of every group of students would be equal and would be the same as the racial/ethnic composition of the schools. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2017 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED574545 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED574545 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 18 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Geographic Regions Type: general – SubjectFull: Civil Rights Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational History Type: general – SubjectFull: School Desegregation Type: general – SubjectFull: Court Litigation Type: general – SubjectFull: Desegregation Litigation Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Aid Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Legislation Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Change Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Legislation Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Law Enforcement Type: general – SubjectFull: School Districts Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Environment Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Experience Type: general – SubjectFull: Minority Group Students Type: general – SubjectFull: School Segregation Type: general – SubjectFull: Institutional Characteristics Type: general – SubjectFull: Racial Composition Type: general – SubjectFull: Charter Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Private Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Poverty Type: general – SubjectFull: Enrollment Trends Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Graphs Type: general – SubjectFull: Brown v Board of Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary and Secondary Education Act Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Southern Schools: More than a Half-Century after the Civil Rights Revolution Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: University of California, Los Angeles. Civil Rights Project / Proyecto Derechos Civiles – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Pennsylvania State University, Center for Education and Civil Rights (CECR) – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Frankenberg, Erica – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hawley, Genevieve Siegel – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ee, Jongyeon – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Orfield, Gary IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Type: published Y: 2017 Titles: – TitleFull: Civil Rights Project - Proyecto Derechos Civiles Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |