NEPC Review: 'The Tax-Credit Scholarship Audit: Do Publicly Funded Private School Choice Programs Save Money?' (EdChoice, October 2016)
Saved in:
| Title: | NEPC Review: 'The Tax-Credit Scholarship Audit: Do Publicly Funded Private School Choice Programs Save Money?' (EdChoice, October 2016) |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Huerta, Luis A., Koutsavlis, Steven, University of Colorado at Boulder, National Education Policy Center |
| Source: | National Education Policy Center. 2017. |
| Availability: | National Education Policy Center. School of Education 249 UCB University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309. Tel: 303-735-5290; e-mail: nepc@colorado.edu; Web site: http://nepc.colorado.edu |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 14 |
| Publication Date: | 2017 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative Opinion Papers |
| Education Level: | Elementary Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Private Schools, School Choice, Tax Credits, Scholarships, Audits (Verification), Cost Effectiveness, Research Methodology, Evaluation Methods, Relevance (Education), Validity, Evidence, Educational Practices, Educational Policy, Research Reports, Elementary Secondary Education |
| Abstract: | This report asserts that tax credit scholarship programs, that distribute scholarships to students via Scholarship Tuition Organizations (STOs), have saved state treasuries between $1.7 and $3.4 billion dollars since 1998. The report argues that these programs are able to realize fiscal savings as a result of students leaving public schools and entering private schools (defined as "switchers"). The report claims that the percentage of students leaving public schools, coupled with the offset of variable per-student costs that districts no longer need to expend, have resulted in the sizable financial savings for state governments. This review questions the method used to estimate the percentage of switcher students across these various programs, and examines how the report determines variable cost fluctuations for each student that leaves public schooling. Since no STO programs require officials to track data on which students transfer out of public schooling into private, these lax accountability standards have led the report author to estimate fiscal savings using conjecture. Instead of following students, they interpreted broad population changes to STOs. Consequently, the results of this report do not provide an acceptable causal conclusion for policymakers. Suggestions for more extensive accounting procedures along with more nuanced methodologies for calculating true variable student costs are discussed. A list of notes and references is included. [For "The Tax-Credit Scholarship Audit: Do Publicly Funded Private School Choice Programs Save Money?," see ED570441.] |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2018 |
| Accession Number: | ED583019 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED583019 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED583019 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: NEPC Review: 'The Tax-Credit Scholarship Audit: Do Publicly Funded Private School Choice Programs Save Money?' (EdChoice, October 2016) – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huerta%2C+Luis+A%2E%22">Huerta, Luis A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Koutsavlis%2C+Steven%22">Koutsavlis, Steven</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22University+of+Colorado+at+Boulder%2C+National+Education+Policy+Center%22">University of Colorado at Boulder, National Education Policy Center</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22National+Education+Policy+Center%22"><i>National Education Policy Center</i></searchLink>. 2017. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: National Education Policy Center. School of Education 249 UCB University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309. Tel: 303-735-5290; e-mail: nepc@colorado.edu; Web site: http://nepc.colorado.edu – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 14 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2017 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Evaluative<br />Opinion Papers – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Private+Schools%22">Private Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Choice%22">School Choice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tax+Credits%22">Tax Credits</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scholarships%22">Scholarships</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Audits+%28Verification%29%22">Audits (Verification)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cost+Effectiveness%22">Cost Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Methodology%22">Research Methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Relevance+%28Education%29%22">Relevance (Education)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Validity%22">Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence%22">Evidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Practices%22">Educational Practices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Reports%22">Research Reports</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This report asserts that tax credit scholarship programs, that distribute scholarships to students via Scholarship Tuition Organizations (STOs), have saved state treasuries between $1.7 and $3.4 billion dollars since 1998. The report argues that these programs are able to realize fiscal savings as a result of students leaving public schools and entering private schools (defined as "switchers"). The report claims that the percentage of students leaving public schools, coupled with the offset of variable per-student costs that districts no longer need to expend, have resulted in the sizable financial savings for state governments. This review questions the method used to estimate the percentage of switcher students across these various programs, and examines how the report determines variable cost fluctuations for each student that leaves public schooling. Since no STO programs require officials to track data on which students transfer out of public schooling into private, these lax accountability standards have led the report author to estimate fiscal savings using conjecture. Instead of following students, they interpreted broad population changes to STOs. Consequently, the results of this report do not provide an acceptable causal conclusion for policymakers. Suggestions for more extensive accounting procedures along with more nuanced methodologies for calculating true variable student costs are discussed. A list of notes and references is included. [For "The Tax-Credit Scholarship Audit: Do Publicly Funded Private School Choice Programs Save Money?," see ED570441.] – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2018 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED583019 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED583019 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Private Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: School Choice Type: general – SubjectFull: Tax Credits Type: general – SubjectFull: Scholarships Type: general – SubjectFull: Audits (Verification) Type: general – SubjectFull: Cost Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Methodology Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Relevance (Education) Type: general – SubjectFull: Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Evidence Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Practices Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Reports Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: NEPC Review: 'The Tax-Credit Scholarship Audit: Do Publicly Funded Private School Choice Programs Save Money?' (EdChoice, October 2016) Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: University of Colorado at Boulder, National Education Policy Center – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Huerta, Luis A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Koutsavlis, Steven IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Type: published Y: 2017 Titles: – TitleFull: National Education Policy Center Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |