View in EDS

Toward Revision-Sensitive Feedback in Automated Writing Evaluation

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Toward Revision-Sensitive Feedback in Automated Writing Evaluation
Language: English
Authors: Allen, Laura K., Jacovina, Matthew E., Johnson, Adam C., McNamara, Danielle S., Roscoe, Rod D.
Source: Grantee Submission. 2016Paper presented at the International Conference on Educational Data Mining (9th, 2016).
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 3
Publication Date: 2016
Sponsoring Agency: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
Contract Number: R305A120707
Document Type: Speeches/Meeting Papers
Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools
Descriptors: Revision (Written Composition), Automation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), High School Students, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Documentation, Writing (Composition), Identification
Abstract: Revising is an essential writing process yet automated writing evaluation systems tend to give feedback on discrete essay drafts rather than changes across drafts. We explore the feasibility of automated revision detection and its potential to guide feedback. Relationships between revising behaviors and linguistic features of students' essays are discussed. [This paper was published in the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining 2016, p628-629.]
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 9
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2018
Accession Number: ED586437
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED586437
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED586437
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Conference
PubTypeId: conference
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Toward Revision-Sensitive Feedback in Automated Writing Evaluation
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Allen%2C+Laura+K%2E%22">Allen, Laura K.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jacovina%2C+Matthew+E%2E%22">Jacovina, Matthew E.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Johnson%2C+Adam+C%2E%22">Johnson, Adam C.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McNamara%2C+Danielle+S%2E%22">McNamara, Danielle S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Roscoe%2C+Rod+D%2E%22">Roscoe, Rod D.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Grantee+Submission%22"><i>Grantee Submission</i></searchLink>. 2016Paper presented at the International Conference on Educational Data Mining (9th, 2016).
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 3
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2016
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: R305A120707
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Speeches/Meeting Papers<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Revision+%28Written+Composition%29%22">Revision (Written Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Automation%22">Automation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Students%22">High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intelligent+Tutoring+Systems%22">Intelligent Tutoring Systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Documentation%22">Documentation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+%28Composition%29%22">Writing (Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Identification%22">Identification</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Revising is an essential writing process yet automated writing evaluation systems tend to give feedback on discrete essay drafts rather than changes across drafts. We explore the feasibility of automated revision detection and its potential to guide feedback. Relationships between revising behaviors and linguistic features of students' essays are discussed. [This paper was published in the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining 2016, p628-629.]
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: Ref
  Label: Number of References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: 9
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: IES Funded
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Yes
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2018
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED586437
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED586437
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 3
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Revision (Written Composition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Automation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: High School Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intelligent Tutoring Systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Documentation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing (Composition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Identification
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Toward Revision-Sensitive Feedback in Automated Writing Evaluation
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Allen, Laura K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jacovina, Matthew E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Johnson, Adam C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: McNamara, Danielle S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Roscoe, Rod D.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2016
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Grantee Submission
              Type: main
ResultId 1